Google Pixel 9 trio leaks in new renders along with screen specs

25 July 2024
The Pixel 9 series is expected to launch with Samsung M14 OLED panels.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • phj
  • 03 Aug 2024

ANDROID LOVERS, 26 Jul 2024Whats the screen ratio? 19.5 : 9 or what?? give the detail ... moresir, just use your calculator to calculate

    • I
    • IQ200
    • Lec
    • 27 Jul 2024

    Anton .el PAPI., 25 Jul 2024The situation of this phone is as follows! You spend 1500 o... moreYes. "We, the 2k something of vocal fans and geeks who are looking at every number on benchmarks amd read the news, yes, we know what's the situation with Google Tensor chipsets"

    Now compare that with majority of people buying Pixel's and the one of the main reasons why do people even consider a Pixel. It's because of a camera results and clean software. Nobody's buying a Pixel because he's a power user. Even when Pixel was with Qualcomm they have never scratched the surface for being a phone for power users. Never. It was just for the cameras pretty much and that's it. You may not like these camera results personally, but the fact is many people will and they do. For almost 8 years since the first Pixel.

    So, i guess your comment is for people already knowing what to expect from the Pixel mostly because of their deal with Samsung. But whatever chipset it got it will make no impact on majority of buyers because they don't care for tech as much as some of us here. I mean thanks for the help I guess but we knew about TSMC the Tensor G5 even before Tensor G3 was released with series 8, but people still keep on buying series 8 and didn't wait for series 10 as you suggested.

    And btw, is it a given that G5 will be so much better with its solo custom project instead of a Samsung collab just because they will produce their chips at TSMC? I don't think TSMC has a power to make a great chip of a chip with bad design and we don't know anything about Google's chips design. At least i don't. If you do, i would appriciate it if you would share it with us, "the geeks" :)

    Cheers!




      • J
      • Jesus
      • f}F
      • 27 Jul 2024

      Pixel is the worst cellphone I've ever purchased. Everyday it seems I just waste my money. Honestly speaking Chinese cheapest phone is even better than pixel. Imagine a situation- if can't even talk for 5 mins at a time- google pixel will give you.this kinda shitty experience.

        I want to buy the pixel 9

          • A
          • ANDROID LOVERS
          • Ki6
          • 26 Jul 2024

          Whats the screen ratio? 19.5 : 9 or what?? give the detail plss 😌 bcz I don't like taller phone I wanna have width phone bcz I used phone to watch movie and streaming series a lot

            • A
            • ANDROID LOVERS
            • Ki6
            • 26 Jul 2024

            Whats the screen ratio? 19.5 : 9 or what?? give the detail plss 😌 bcz I don't like taller phone I wanna have width phone bcz I used phone to watch movie and streaming series a lot

              • n
              • nope
              • nC4
              • 25 Jul 2024

              Latest leak of official marketing/promotion sheets proves that rear camera is the same and have no upgrades at all, no 50mp imx858, it is still using same 48mp ultrawide and periscope from P8 Pro.

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • KLR
                • 25 Jul 2024

                Anton .el PAPI., 25 Jul 2024The situation of this phone is as follows! You spend 1500 o... morethere no guarantee that G5 is leap better than G4
                the only things that we can quite sure is it might more power efficient due manufactured with tsmc instead samsung
                similar to snapdragon 8gen2 compared to 8gen1

                its possible waiting for pixel10 and then get disappointed too as its not as good as your expectation or you dont like something

                and then there are many trade-in promotion, like in google store themselves, just google "pixel phone trade-in"
                people that want to upgrade their phone definitely wont need to pay full, most likely half of the price if upgrade from last gen, if u saying it still money-loss, if they got money why not?
                money can be gained but you cant regain time that already pass

                  Darth Caesium, 25 Jul 2024I would like to see Google grow some balls and actually com... moreI completely agree with your last paragraph! I LOVE curvy stuff, be it cars, bikes or mobile phones. Nice curves just feel so nice to touch. And now that we have matte glass, it feels nice to rub against as well, unlike the super sticky glossy surfaces of the past.

                  Also, I think with the specs you listed, Google should definitely go for a 500 dollar Pixel 9a. There's no other phone with a proper triple camera system apart from the Vivo (V30 Pro). Every other phone is either a lot more expensive OR has a damn near unusable UW cam. I believe the Pixel 9a could be worth 500 dollars even with the same UW as they have right now if they can put a 3x lens into the phone. A triple camera system with a flagship G4 is I think well worth 500 dollars. If they don't have the super cool small bezels of the Pixel 8 and have the thick bezels of the 8a on the 9a, then I'd give 450 dollars at best. The main camera could be a 1/1.49" one like in the Vivo X100. I believe that sensor, although not much bigger than the 1/1.56" ones, is amazing. I saw some shots of that phone and it's just amazing what a photo processing chip can do. The same sensor on the Neo9 Pro is just bad in comparison. Pretty sure Google can do some cool trickery to optimize that sensor
                  But anyways, I hope they use the same UW cam, have a telephoto have smaller bezels, use the Tensor G4 and put in a 1/1.49" cam like the X100. Only then will I pay 500 dollars.

                  I thought your Pixel 9 price was a tad too high then I saw your listed specs and then I agree that yeah, those specs on a compact phone would result in a high price tag and it's justified. I just think instead of using 2 IMX858's, they could put in one for the UW cam or the one in the Pixel 8 Pro, and then use the telephoto sensor from the Pixel 8 Pro OR the OV64B for the telephoto. That sensor is the best sensor made in the past 2 years, right beside the IMX989.

                  Same goes for the Pixel 9 Pro and Pro XL, the same UW cam with the OV64B would be a huge upgrade because of the larger size. Xiaomi's reached the limits of the IMX858 on their 14 Ultra with the amazingly fast aperture and it still can't properly match the larger sensors. So imagine an OV64B on the Pixel 9 with f/3.0 or faster aperture and on the 9 Pro/Pro XL with f/2.5 or faster aperture. That'd be game changing. Damn near lossless 2x crop and much better farther zooming capabilities thanks to Google's awesome AI zoom thing.

                  Finally, the pricing should all be down 100 dollars. So the Pixel 9 would be 600-700 dollars, the 9 Pro would be 800-900 dollars and the 9 Pro XL would be 1000 dollars at best. Why? Tensor G4. A glorified Exynos chip should not be considered to be the same price as its competitors, the moment they start using the Dimensity 9400 or the latest flagship as a base for its chips, I'm willing to spend even 1100 dollars on their top phone, if they further update the sensors ofc. Not now though. Samsung has the S Pen, the Chinese have better sensors and Google seemingly has nothing worth that much. If I had money to waste I'd go and buy 1100 big macs instead of this or a second hand motorcycle. Less e-waste and more fun than getting a Google flagship.

                    • R
                    • Ray
                    • cUv
                    • 25 Jul 2024

                    Is this phone going to drop calls too?

                      Anonymous, 25 Jul 2024Just proves all this huge text is to annoy us all. Lase... moreSo then how come CDAF+PDAF is possible, and is being done by most phones nowadays?

                      Edit: DPAF combines CDAF+PDAF into a single system with the benefits of both, so combining CDAF and PDAF to a create a multi-system autofocus setup is redundant and expensive. Thus, disregard my comment.

                        The situation of this phone is as follows! You spend 1500 on this knowing that next year Google will change the SOC that we have been waiting for from Google and you spend 1500 or more again, because pixel 10 will not be cheap at all, and you lose money with this pixel 9 or skip this one and wait for 10!! what a mystery hehehehe

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • 0p}
                          • 25 Jul 2024

                          Darth Caesium, 25 Jul 2024Tell both of the latter comments to GSMArena, they themselv... moreJust proves all this huge text is to annoy us all.

                          Laser AF and Tof have same purposes. Just number of points are different. With laser being single point.

                          AF system can be CDAF, PDAF and DPAF. You cannot have PDAF + DPAF at same time. Both are hardware level. Baked into sensor.

                          If you think google can give you pixel.with this for $600, you are eitheir trolling or being too innocent of how much stuff cost.

                            I have made an updated version now, should fix some mistakes while adding a few new stuff.

                            I would like to see Google grow some balls and actually compete. The Pixel 9a should be sold at no more than $400/£400/€400.

                            Pixel 9a:
                            •Price — $400
                            •Display — 6.1", 88% screen-to-body-ratio, 48-120Hz, LTPS OLED, 2400×1080, 240Hz touch sampling rate, 2000nits (peak), HDR10+
                            •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminium frame, plastic back, IP67 rating (1m for 30 minutes)
                            •Chipset — Tensor G4
                            •Memory — 256GB UFS 3.1 + 8GB LPDDR5 RAM
                            •Rear cameras:
                            ✓Sony LYT-700C — 50MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56"-type, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
                            ✓Samsung ISOCELL JN1 — 50MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.74"-type, 0.64µm, PDAF (2.5cm-∞)
                            •Selfie cameras:
                            ✓Samsung ISOCELL 3J11 — 10.5MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/3.1"-type, 1.22µm, PDAF
                            •Battery and charging — 5000mAh Li-Po; 50W wired, 25W wireless
                            •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer

                            Pixel 9:
                            •Price — $700; $800
                            •Display — 6.2", 90% screen-to-body-ratio, 1-120Hz, LTPO OLED, 2400×1080, 360Hz touch sampling rate, 2600nits (peak), HDR10+, Dolby Vision
                            •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass Armour), aluminium frame, aramid fibre back, IP68 rating (1.5m for 30 minutes)
                            •Chipset — Tensor G4
                            •Memory — 512GB UFS 4.1 + 12GB LPDDR5X RAM / 1TB UFS 4.1 + 12GB LPDDR5X
                            •Rear cameras:
                            ✓Samsung ISOCELL GN2 (modified version) — 50MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.12"-type, 1.4µm, Quad Pixel PDAF, 8×8 dToF Laser AF, OIS
                            ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.0, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (2.5cm-∞), 8×8 dToF Laser AF
                            ✓8×8 dToF (depth/Laser AF)
                            •Selfie cameras:
                            ✓Samsung IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF
                            •Battery and charging — 5000mAh Li-Po; 80W wired, 50W wireless
                            •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer

                            Pixel 9 Pro:
                            •Price — $1000
                            •Display — 6.3", 92% screen-to-body-ratio, 1-120Hz, LTPO OLED, 2640×1180, 480Hz touch sampling rate, 3000nits (peak), HDR10+, Dolby Vision
                            •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass Armour), aluminium frame, aramid fibre back, IP68 rating (1.5m for 30 minutes)
                            •Chipset — Tensor G4
                            •Memory — 1TB UFS 4.1 + 16GB LPDDR5X RAM
                            •Rear cameras:
                            ✓Samsung ISOCELL GN2 (modified) — 50MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.12"-type, 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, 0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR AF, OIS
                            ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.74"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (2.5cm-∞), 0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR AF
                            ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (12cm-∞), 0.3MP d ToF 3D LiDAR AF, OIS
                            ✓0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR (depth/LiDAR AF), (up to 100cm)
                            •Selfie cameras:
                            ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, 0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR AF
                            ✓0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR (depth/LiDAR AF/biometrics)
                            •Battery and charging — 5500mAh Si/C; 120W wired, 50W wireless
                            •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, colour spectrum, temperature

                            Pixel 9 Pro XL:
                            •Price — $1100
                            •Display — 6.9", 92% screen-to-body-ratio, 1-120Hz, LTPO OLED, 2900×1300, 480Hz touch sampling rate, 3000nits (peak), HDR10+, Dolby Vision
                            •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass Armour), aluminium frame, aramid fibre back, IP68 rating (1.5m for 30 minutes)
                            •Chipset — Tensor G4
                            •Memory — 1TB UFS 4.1 + 16GB LPDDR5X RAM
                            •Rear cameras:
                            ✓Samsung ISOCELL GN2 (modified) — 50MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.12"-type, 1.4µm, Quad Pixel PDAF, 0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR AF, OIS
                            ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (2.5cm-∞), 0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR AF
                            ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.8, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (12cm-∞), 0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR AF, OIS
                            ✓0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR (depth/LiDAR AF), (up to 100cm)
                            •Selfie cameras:
                            ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, 0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR AF
                            ✓0.3MP dToF 3D LiDAR (depth/LiDAR AF/biometrics)
                            •Battery and charging — 6200mAh Si/C; 120W wired, 50W wireless
                            •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, colour spectrum, temperature

                            This would allow all of the phones to shine at their price points and remain competitive while also offering tangible upgrades across the board for each price tier. The Pro phones' only differences between each other, naturally, would be about their size and battery capacity, so those two phones are in the same price category.

                              Darth Caesium, 25 Jul 2024Tell both of the latter comments to GSMArena, they themselv... moreWell they are anonymous for a reason I guess. Just ignore them

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • y26
                                • 25 Jul 2024

                                Lister, 25 Jul 2024I'm warming to this new release, all it needs is decen... moreYou're comparing the wrong phones.

                                Presumably the iPhone Pro and the Pixel Pro, based on battery stats you gave.

                                  Anonymous, 25 Jul 2024Copy + paste comment? 🤣 Even forgot to remove " out... moreTell both of the latter comments to GSMArena, they themselves refer to these as Dual Pixel PDAF and 8×8 dToF Laser AF. And yes, I did forget to change display to outer display, purely because it's easier to follow a template that I wrote before and apply it to comments about other phones later on. It's a tiny mistake I made, stop pissing your pants over it like a 3 year old child throwing a temper tantrum. It's always these anonymous commenters writing such tiny nitpicks or braindead comments because they're too scared to actually use an account/use their real account because then it would make them look extra bad.

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • 0p}
                                    • 25 Jul 2024

                                    Darth Caesium, 25 Jul 2024I would like to see Google grow some balls and actually com... moreCopy + paste comment? 🤣 Even forgot to remove " outer display" from " what samsung should do comments"

                                    Again: tof and laser together when both have same fuction? Dual pixel PDAF does not exist, it is either DP or phase detection.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • 0p}
                                      • 25 Jul 2024

                                      Lister, 25 Jul 2024I'm warming to this new release, all it needs is decen... moreNot sure it is android thing or OEM software.
                                      With only one app open ( those that show hardware info) , the a55 cores were most of the time at base frequency while the A7x cores mostly at max frequency.

                                      What is need of this?

                                        jiyen235, 25 Jul 2024This basically makes the Pixel 9 or the upcoming 9a more re... moreI would like to see Google grow some balls and actually compete. The Pixel 9a should be sold at no more than $400/£400/€400.

                                        Pixel 9a:
                                        •Price — $400
                                        •Outer display — 6.1", 88% screen-to-body-ratio, 48-120Hz, LTPS OLED, 2400×1080, 240Hz touch sampling rate, 2000nits (peak), HDR10+
                                        •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminium frame, plastic back, IP67 rating (1m for 30 minutes)
                                        •Chipset — Tensor G4
                                        •Memory — 256GB UFS 3.1 + 8GB LPDDR5 RAM
                                        •Rear cameras:
                                        ✓Sony LYT-700C — 50MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56"-type, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
                                        ✓Samsung ISOCELL JN1 — 50MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.74"-type, 0.64µm, PDAF (2.5cm-∞)
                                        •Selfie cameras:
                                        ✓Samsung ISOCELL 3J11 — 10.5MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/3.1"-type, 1.22µm, PDAF
                                        •Battery and charging — 5000mAh Li-Po; 50W wired, 25W wireless
                                        •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer

                                        Pixel 9:
                                        •Price — $700; $800
                                        •Outer display — 6.2", 90% screen-to-body-ratio, 1-120Hz, LTPO OLED, 2400×1080, 360Hz touch sampling rate, 2600nits (peak), HDR10+, Dolby Vision
                                        •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass Armour), aluminium frame, aramid fibre back, IP68 rating (1.5m for 30 minutes)
                                        •Chipset — Tensor G4
                                        •Memory — 512GB UFS 4.1 + 12GB LPDDR5X RAM / 1TB UFS 4.1 + 12GB LPDDR5X
                                        •Rear cameras:
                                        ✓Samsung ISOCELL GN2 (modified version) — 50MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.12"-type, 1.4µm, Quad Pixel PDAF, 8×8 dToF Laser AF, OIS
                                        ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.0, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (2.5cm-∞), 8×8 dToF Laser AF
                                        •Selfie cameras:
                                        ✓Samsung IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF
                                        •Battery and charging — 5000mAh Li-Po; 80W wired, 50W wireless
                                        •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer

                                        Pixel 9 Pro:
                                        •Price — $1000
                                        •Outer display — 6.3", 92% screen-to-body-ratio, 1-120Hz, LTPO OLED, 2640×1180, 480Hz touch sampling rate, 3000nits (peak), HDR10+, Dolby Vision
                                        •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass Armour), aluminium frame, aramid fibre back, IP68 rating (1.5m for 30 minutes)
                                        •Chipset — Tensor G4
                                        •Memory — 1TB UFS 4.1 + 16GB LPDDR5X RAM
                                        •Rear cameras:
                                        ✓Samsung ISOCELL GN2 (modified) — 50MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.12"-type, 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, 0.3MP dToF 3D Laser AF, OIS
                                        ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.74"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (2.5cm-∞), 0.3MP dToF 3D Laser AF
                                        ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (12cm-∞), 0.3MP dToF 3D Laser AF, OIS
                                        •Selfie cameras:
                                        ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF
                                        •Battery and charging — 5500mAh Si/C; 120W wired, 50W wireless
                                        •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer

                                        Pixel 9 Pro XL:
                                        •Price — $1100
                                        •Outer display — 6.9", 92% screen-to-body-ratio, 1-120Hz, LTPO OLED, 2900×1300, 480Hz touch sampling rate, 3000nits (peak), HDR10+, Dolby Vision
                                        •Build quality — Glass front (Gorilla Glass Armour), aluminium frame, aramid fibre back, IP68 rating (1.5m for 30 minutes)
                                        •Chipset — Tensor G4
                                        •Memory — 1TB UFS 4.1 + 16GB LPDDR5X RAM
                                        •Rear cameras:
                                        ✓Samsung ISOCELL GN2 (modified) — 50MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.12"-type, 1.4µm, Quad Pixel PDAF, 0.3MP dToF Laser AF, OIS
                                        ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 126° FoV, 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (2.5cm-∞), 0.3MP dToF 3D Laser AF
                                        ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.8, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF (12cm-∞), 0.3MP dToF 3D Laser AF, OIS
                                        •Selfie cameras:
                                        ✓Sony IMX858 — 50MP, f/2.2, 20mm (wide), 1/2.51"-type, 0.7µm, Dual Pixel PDAF
                                        •Battery and charging — 6200mAh Si/C; 120W wired, 50W wireless
                                        •Sensors — Fingerprint (under-display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer

                                        This would allow all of the phones to shine at their price points and remain competitive while also offering tangible upgrades across the board for each price tier. The Pro phones' only difference, naturally, would be about size and battery capacity, so those are in the same price category.

                                        Also, I think most regulars on this website know about my opinion on the Pixel 9 series' aesthetics and design by now. Google really shouldn't have made these phones flat, and instead should've continued the Pixel 8 series' aesthetic while having a matte design across the board for both the back and the frame for every phone. The corners could've been rounded ever so slightly more, but what the Pixel 9 series has done is too close to Apple's nonsensically rounded corners, which serve no purpose while also cutting off video content.

                                          1 of 2