MediaTek Dimensity 9400 CPU details leak

04 October 2024
It keeps the all large core design of the 9300, but improves upon it.

Sort by:

Anonymous, 20 hours agoSooo with all this, Is Snapdragon still a better option th... moreI prefer snapdragon because of the sound output.
It's far superior than Mediatek.
In all other aspects, they are almost same.

But a big NO to Samsung made Snapdragon chips.

    • n
    • nicetry
    • xxW
    • 2 hours ago

    DeepIn2U, 6 hours agoDamaung is NOTa failure in chipproduction bub! 1. They&#... moredo you know that nand and microprocessor use different type of tech? samsung is big player in nand but that doesnt have anything related to microprocessor. told people to do research but look at what you said. its misinformation!

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • x{6
      • 2 hours ago

      Anonymous, 10 hours agoMmm no, look at the max performance numbers, Dimensity 9300... moreThe graph states that at 15 watts, sd8g3 can produce around 6500 points but 9300+ can produce nearly 7000 points. The graph also showed that sd8gen is incapable of reaching 7000 points because of wattage constraints.

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • pfP
        • 2 hours ago

        Not Again, 8 hours agoToday courtesy of prolific Chinese leakster Digital Chat St... moreAll are Arm v9.2.
        As Cortex A55 managed to run with A75, A76, A77 and A78 and DynamIQ (what people are still calling big.LITTLE) can be very heterogeneous, I wouldn't be surprised about cortex X4, but think A725 will be used.
        X925, X4, A725, A720, After all, all those cores are Arm v9.2.
        It's not like puting Cortex X3 as it is Arm v9.0

        Plus remember Mediatek already did things outside Arm's specifications : tri-clusters and decacores...on big.LITTLE limited to 2 clusters of 4 homogeneous cores according to Arm's design

          IpsDisplay, 8 hours agoThe vivo x100 being top 5 greatest camera performers But... morecompare photos taken on vivo X100 Pro and X100 Ultra by GSMArena and you'll see the difference

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • pfP
            • 4 hours ago

            DeepIn2U, 6 hours agoDamaung is NOTa failure in chipproduction bub! 1. They&#... moreRemember 8 Gen 1 with Samsung's 4nm and 8+ Gen 1 with TSMC's.
            Huge gap between the 2 in terme of efficiency and thermal throttling.
            https://youtu.be/hOipGhITvfk?si=lazqp2_nw7qNASie

            Now, TSMC's still better than Samsung.
            And you can't be sure Samsung's 2nm will be better than TSMC's 3nm. Even if it's thé New GAAFet vs FINFet

              • J
              • JustTimepass
              • fCQ
              • 4 hours ago

              Ok So for Mediatek 9300 someone said it's better only cause of They used extra X4 but well Even so it's their choice? SD had their options and Mdtk had it's own and they gave us the final product and As for inferior and Superior
              Those gaming Focus phones choose SD cause yeah it's more reputed not cause they are superior
              Mdtk has not been in Market for that long compared to SD so ofc it'll have more Fame but at the same time Mdtk does not fall short on performance
              And like how Red Magic had used 8 gen 3 chip for it's phone
              It's just a Guess but If they had used Mdtk 9300 I think it would've been crushed SD 8 gen 3
              Like for real comparison a company should just for text purpose make A same phone with both the processor on each and test it
              And I can say MDTk will not fall short at all
              Mdtk can Do anything as long as the Phone Allows it to
              Like they Pour extra work for SD processors
              If done same for MDtk Processor it'll outperform SD without any problems

                • P
                • PragmaticQuestion2
                • BPZ
                • 5 hours ago

                I mean, specifying the hardware issue with Vulkan API; the MESA Driver Project, Will it work 100% with this new SOC?

                Thanks again.

                  • P
                  • Pragmatic Question
                  • BPZ
                  • 5 hours ago

                  I would like to ask an intelligent and pragmatic question, which goes beyond the context of fanboyism, recklessness and ignorance of the parties.

                  Does this new SOC finally have 100% compatibility [IN HARDWARE] with Vulkan?

                  Or is it still just "the train of words" that travels?

                  Thanks to those who will answer in a concise, synthetic and professional manner.

                    SixSeis, 05 Oct 2024I very much hope that this Dimensity 9400 will be at the le... moreDamaung is NOTa failure in chipproduction bub!

                    1. They're facility is on 2NM process which is almost a full YEAR AHEAD of TSMC! Qualcom SD 8 Gen 5 may return to Samsung Foundry for production as a split with TAMC!

                    2. NVidia already approved of orders of next generation and faster HMB3-x RAM for high end AI servers in heavy demand at NVidia and Samsung did so in less than 6mths from being behind!

                    Samsungs ONLY issue os creating a competing brand for SoC to the competition. That was NEVER their experience. Energy efficient RAM & storage is there expertise.

                    Learn the topic of which you speak first before speaking in the future!

                      • B
                      • Blue
                      • KgZ
                      • 6 hours ago

                      [deleted post]Qualcomm paying you good

                        [deleted post]Talking about Huawei when they don't even use Mediatek or Qualcomm chips because you believe bringing up irrelevant topics and throwing personal insults somehow make you look more mature. Grow up.

                        "I want to see videos where phone with D9300 can complete list of tasks much faster.."
                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-WW0tVFmsk&t=307s
                        Satisfied now?

                        "Considering D9300 has THREE extra X4, difference to 8g3 has to be larger than.."
                        Under most circumstances D9300's X-series cores are clocked low enough so that they can utilise their wider core design to achieve better power efficiency. The difference in performance becomes obvious when you push it hard enough, not when you're scrolling through Twitter.

                        "Well done made cooling system can mask heat issues"
                        When did I ever mention heat? I've been talking about the raw performance and efficiency for the entire time.

                          Invetor, 18 hours agonice but Mediatek ISP sucks and makes watercolored, overpro... moreThe vivo x100 being top 5 greatest camera performers

                          But alright 😂

                            • N
                            • Not Again
                            • miA
                            • 8 hours ago

                            Nick Tegrataker, 20 hours agoI know you've had no choice but to double down on your... moreToday courtesy of prolific Chinese leakster Digital Chat Station we get purported details about its CPU cores. According to DCS, the Dimensity 9400 will have one Cortex-X925 super-large core clocked at up to 3.626 GHz, three Cortex-X4 large cores, and four Cortex-A720 cores, though the latter could be a typo since Cortex-A725 are the latest designs from Arm
                            purported=fake

                            I guess we will have only a couple of days to wait.
                            Nano review has the Dimensity 9400 announcement on 1st November 2024 so Applesque
                            Find X8 announced 08/10/2024 without Dimensity 9400 specifics, the rumoured architecture is this

                            It appears that DCS rather than a leak has invented this Configuration

                            Dimensity 9300
                            1x 3.25 GHz Cortex-X4; 3x 2.85 GHz Cortex-X4; 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720

                            DCS configuration makes no sense the X925 Arm statement
                            "Replacing the ARM Cortex X4 is the new Cortex-X925, which promises users up to a 36% boost in single-threaded performance. Additionally, ARM has revealed their Cortex-A725 core, which replaces their Cortex-A720 core. This new mid-range core delivers up to 35% more “performance efficiency” than its predecessor."

                            The X4 Cortex clearly doesn't belong X925 & X725 ONLY ( indeed if a typo he has had enough time to correct it.)
                            I am not going to invest time researching but I personally have not seen 3 cortices configuration let alone clock speeds stay the same.

                              cyber, 9 hours agoit it significantly cheaper and significantly worse,mtk is ... moreI still keep seeing Qualcomm fanboys who are not yet ready to accept the fact that last year's Dimensity 9300 took down the 8 Gen 3 in both performance and efficiency

                                • c
                                • cyber
                                • S2D
                                • 9 hours ago

                                it it significantly cheaper and significantly worse,mtk is well known crapmaker and this will never change

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • LfV
                                  • 10 hours ago

                                  Nick Tegrataker, 20 hours agoI know you've had no choice but to double down on your... moreDifference in ipc between x4 and a720 cores also isn't as much as he thinks-a720 is more like 2/3 of x4 ipc

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • pUW
                                    • 10 hours ago

                                    Anonymous, 10 hours agoNo, look at at the curveThen you cant interpret the curve, dont lose my time

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • LfV
                                      • 10 hours ago

                                      Anonymous, 10 hours agoMmm no, look at the max performance numbers, Dimensity 9300... moreNo, look at at the curve

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • pUW
                                        • 10 hours ago

                                        Anonymous, 12 hours agoIt's actually opposite www.socpk.com/cpucurveMmm no, look at the max performance numbers, Dimensity 9300+ 7150 points in Geekbench 5 and about 17.4w power consumption, 410 points per W.

                                        8 Gen 3 6700 points and about 15.3w power consumption, 437 points per W.

                                        As I said in light and medium loads 9300+ is about same or more efficient, but I should tell you Geekbench 6 is a more realistic real life scenario than Geekbench 5, GB5 simulates a perfect scaling software, and we know real life apps dont scale that good, games are very dependent on render thread that cant be multi threaded.

                                          1 of 3