iPhone 16 Pro vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max
- ?
- Anonymous
- vxx
- 18 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 18 Oct 2024If they release iPhone SE with A18 then it will eat up iPhone 15.SE price is probably going to get hiked to 500 or 550.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7k4
- 18 Oct 2024
If they release iPhone SE with A18 then it will eat up iPhone 15.
- i
- impinas
- 3Af
- 18 Oct 2024
Nameless, 17 Oct 2024Equalizing all cameras between both PRO models is probably ... moreWell said! So true.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0cB
- 18 Oct 2024
Azu10157, 18 Oct 20246.9" screen would be nice for some people when gaming,... moreWhat a surprise bro. Mine is s24+ too though I'm not a gamer. For gaming consoles are the best coupled by a large tv screen.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 18 Oct 2024
Nick Tegrataker, 18 Oct 2024"LG would surely waste time and money to develop that ... moreOne of the best ultrawides(z60 ultra) has ov50e. It has actually base iso of 50, it's just that some oems decide to disable below 100 for it and it has dcg(which should be used more)
- Azu10157
- IAM
- 18 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2024Of course pro max. If you love watching videos and playing ... more6.9" screen would be nice for some people when gaming, but in my experience playing GTA: Chinatown Wars and Pokémon Unite on my S24+ the screen is still small for me.
Watching media on the 16PM compared to 16P is nice though I'll admit
- justasmile
- vjq
- 18 Oct 2024
Now that the 16 Pro is larger at a respectable 6.3", the Pro is probably the perfect one now.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PTF
- 18 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2024If only they had not just 6.9 and 6.3 but also 5.7 inchYeah at this point I would take a 5.8inch iPhone Mini even though it is slightly larger than 13 mini. Come one Apple!
- S
- Sammy0
- q{r
- 18 Oct 2024
What's the point of the detailed camera comparison between an identical set of cameras? The results were expectedly the same!
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xp6
- 18 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 18 Oct 2024LG would surely waste time and money to develop that and ha... more"LG would surely waste time and money to develop that and have it ready for mass production..."
You're not making sense. If a particular item makes it to the production, that means the company is being certain that they can be profitable by producing the said item, but that no way implies, 1. The image quality is comparable to a standard prime lens, 2. The yield rate is high enough to meet extremely high demand.
"All 1/1.56" are bad. Leadt worse is isocell gn3"
It's better than having a tiny type 1/3.5" sensor behind a mediocre quality "optical zoom" lens, applying a ton of sharpening and letting their fans pretend like it's better than a solution that uses a four times larger sensor.
It's not just about the cost - optical zoom design sacrifices the image quality A TON, there's a reason why good zoom lenses for interchangeable cameras tend to be very large and extremely expensive, yet most of them still fall behind equally priced prime lenses.
"Like oppo has competence to properly use that"
Show me the proof, buddy. I know you can't provide one, but I can still wait a little.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 18 Oct 2024
Nick Tegrataker, 18 Oct 2024Outside of the cost, the image quality and yield rate are p... moreBy the way, marisilicon chip was axed because of money..
Same reason oppo and realme trading lyt808 for 1/1.56"
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 18 Oct 2024
Nick Tegrataker, 18 Oct 2024Outside of the cost, the image quality and yield rate are p... moreLG would surely waste time and money to develop that and have it ready for mass production if they were not sure quality is what expected.
Nobody uses because of price. 2 cameras with FL fixed is cheaper solution, more difference than you think between two systems.
Like oppo has competence to properly use that. Worst photos among all imx989/lyt900 phones.
Yeah, 65mm using digital zoom surely can replace zoom camera. 🤣
All 1/1.56" are bad. Leadt worse is isocell gn3.
Upscaled photos and videos at other FLs are great ✌🏻..
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xp6
- 18 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 17 Oct 2024Apple can afford any component out there. Should have the... moreOutside of the cost, the image quality and yield rate are problems with optical zoom modules for mobile phones. Oppo also had once announced the development of their own solution of optical zoom, but they ended up stuffing a large sensor behind a prime lens for their flagships released later, and everyone except for one company seems to be taking this route, too.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7va
- 17 Oct 2024
16 pro is worse than 16 plus.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 17 Oct 2024
Apple can afford any component out there.
Should have the 4.4 - 9.0x module from LG Innotek.
101 - 207mm.
- ?
- Anonymous
- sXH
- 17 Oct 2024
"The 16 Pro has gained a bit of weight and is also 3mm taller and a mm wider than last year's model - so in a way, it's the safety net for those that will be put off by the new Max's size, but don't quite want a small phone. On the other hand, if you're looking for a compact 'Pro', perhaps this one still qualifies - with enough context and rationalization."
Baffling. Wanna translate?
- ?
- Anonymous
- gKB
- 17 Oct 2024
Nameless, 17 Oct 2024Equalizing all cameras between both PRO models is probably ... morepro in iphone mean nothing tiny battery slow charging 60 hz pro is only pice 1000$ for 60 hz is pathetic
- j
- jiyen235
- XQQ
- 17 Oct 2024
Nameless, 17 Oct 2024Equalizing all cameras between both PRO models is probably ... moreyeah but the problem is that they ain't consistent. The 11 Pro and Pro Max were the same, then the 12 Pro got nuked, the 13/14 Pro and Pro Max were the same and then the 15 Pro got nuked and now we have the 16 Pros.
- N
- Nameless
- 0xQ
- 17 Oct 2024
Equalizing all cameras between both PRO models is probably the best thing Apple did in years. Now Samsung should give at least main camera from Ultra to S-line brothers. Coz now they are just midrangers.
- A
- Adri
- 3Xs
- 17 Oct 2024
I want a mini version too :(