Details on Galaxy S25 Ultra's main camera spotted in listing
- E
- Eduard33
- nqy
- 09 Dec 2024
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2024You're delusional if you think f/2.4 1/3,52" stac... moreX200 pro's telephoto is 1/1.4". X200 and X200 Pro Mini have the 1/1.95" sensor
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 09 Dec 2024
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2024You're delusional if you think f/2.4 1/3,52" stac... moreAlso way too many jaggies, frame and backplate can be curved without making screen curved.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 09 Dec 2024
WhoCaresTM, 09 Dec 2024Great arguments, much brain, good show.You're delusional if you think f/2.4 1/3,52" stacks up against f/2.6 1/1,95"
- W
- WhoCaresTM
- 0mU
- 09 Dec 2024
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2024Lol, lmao evenGreat arguments, much brain, good show.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 09 Dec 2024
WhoCaresTM, 09 Dec 2024Oh please, there is no other flagship worth buying, period!... moreLol, lmao even
- ?
- Anonymous
- Ng$
- 09 Dec 2024
I like
- s
- scaramanga89
- 0@x
- 09 Dec 2024
samsungo, 09 Dec 2024the 200mp sensor ruined all the ultra lineup cameras, they ... moreAgreed. And that 3x for portraits of unusable in anything but perfect light. It takes photos that look like a 2002 Nokia. Still no reason to upgrade from my S23U.
- ?
- Anonymous
- QyE
- 09 Dec 2024
S21u++++
- David 040882
- spY
- 09 Dec 2024
sanshiro, 09 Dec 2024DxOMark will probably still give the S25 Ultra's camer... moreDxOMArk's ratings are a load of bs, anyways. They have lost their reputation long ago, especially since it's pretty clear and a known fact that certain brands, particularly Honor, pay them to get a high rating on their smartphones. So apart from their reviews, I wouldn't even look at DxOMArk.
- N
- Nameless
- 0xQ
- 09 Dec 2024
Shamrock Sean, 09 Dec 2024Why aren't they upgrading the 3x zoom?? Pathetic come ... moreTrue. This ancient 3x 10 Mp trash camera ruins the whole camera setup. Samsung loves to hold back some things unupgraded just to have them upgradable next year.
- s
- sanshiro
- pwv
- 09 Dec 2024
DxOMark will probably still give the S25 Ultra's camera a lower rating. So...
- D
- Darth Caesium
- dUQ
- 09 Dec 2024
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2024No, s24 ultra has f/3.4 on periscopeSorry I goofed there for a second.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 09 Dec 2024
Darth Caesium, 09 Dec 2024What they should do for the S25 Ultra: •Main cam — Samsung... moreNo, s24 ultra has f/3.4 on periscope
- D
- Darth Caesium
- dUQ
- 09 Dec 2024
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2024They should be using jn3 in front cam, ultrawide should be ... moreWhat they should do for the S25 Ultra:
•Main cam — Samsung ISOCELL HP2 (same as current); 24mm; f/1.7 (same as current)
•Ultrawide — Samsung ISOCELL GNJ; 12mm; f/2.0; 1.5cm-∞
•3× periscope telephoto — Samsung ISOCELL JN3; 72mm; f/2.2; 8cm-∞
•5× periscope telephoto — Samsung ISOCELL JN3; 120mm; f/2.8; (12cm-∞)
•Selfie — Samsung ISOCELL JN3; 24mm; f/1.8
By only using Samsung sensors, they should be able to get their costs down. That would be, if Samsung's businesses weren't run so badly in coordination with each other, as it's so bad that it's publicly known that using equivalent Samsung sensors instead of Sony ones does not make it any cheaper for them to produce their phones.
EDIT: The S25 and S25+ would get the 3× periscope setup and the main camera while having the Samsung ISOCELL JN5 for the selfie camera with an f/2.0 focal aperture and the Samsung ISOCELL JN3 for their ultrawide. Both should get the macro on the ultrawide and the telemacro.
EDIT 2: The current S24 Ultra's 5× periscope has an f/3.4 focal aperture, not f/2.8.
- D
- Darth Caesium
- dUQ
- 09 Dec 2024
What, 09 Dec 2024May not be perfect but still the only flagship worth paying... moreUsername checks out
- c
- charlixcx
- GFq
- 09 Dec 2024
praying for the scamsung fans, maybe in 2032 y'all will be able to buy a phone with updated hardware
- c
- charlixcx
- GFq
- 09 Dec 2024
What, 09 Dec 2024May not be perfect but still the only flagship worth paying... moreyess let's all pay a premium for recycled hardware
- W
- WhoCaresTM
- 0mU
- 09 Dec 2024
Heis, 09 Dec 2024I hope this is sarcasmOh please, there is no other flagship worth buying, period!
The only phone with better cameras is Vivo's X200 pro, bit the software is pure crap! All other Chinese phones aren't even close. They offer nothing more, not even a freakin headphone jack, but charge just as much as Samsung, but they have neither the software, nor support, or even brand recognition.
All of them need to be at least 20% cheaper than Samsung to make sense, otherwise you're out of your mind if you buy a Chinese phone.