Realme 14 Pro+ in for review
- V
- Vegetaholic
- n5R
- 23 Jan 2025
To answer the last sentence is, so we don't use these useless phones like Realme 14 Pro + pretending to do anything good, especially with those useless cameras at the back and gimmicky colour shiftings 🙂
- a
- alexcpass50
- Pm4
- 21 Jan 2025
Anonymous, 18 Jan 2025No the device is not OK. Cheap OLED screen No audio jack ... moreI understand your point of view. But I speak from the Brazilian market, which does not have much competition. What I call "ok" is good enough for Brazil, but it certainly is not good enough as a basis for Europe and/or Asia.
- T
- Tech
- s8f
- 19 Jan 2025
Full review, when pls revert
- A
- Ar
- uCp
- 19 Jan 2025
When is the full review going to be released ?. Cant wait for it 😁
- a
- abac
- nqT
- 18 Jan 2025
I'm not sure this phone is worth its money. Perhaps in the future, when the price goes down, it will be more interesting to buy. The most important thing is the cameras and image quality, whether it has become better compared to the previous model or not, and I would really like to see a detailed review and comparison with the 13 pro+. The rest of the parameters are secondary to this model. Cameras are what people buy these Realme models for, IMHO
- ?
- Anonymous
- Sr6
- 18 Jan 2025
alexcpass50, 17 Jan 2025The device is ok. But Realme's launch policy is gettin... moreNo the device is not OK.
Cheap OLED screen
No audio jack
No sd card slot
Bunch of missing features.
That's a hard pass.
Show me Next phone go go
- N
- New
- X}M
- 18 Jan 2025
Not good specs from realme at this price point.
It should be max 20k.
- ?
- Anonymous
- X}M
- 18 Jan 2025
The Android Freak, 16 Jan 2025Everything is good, but Realme needs to make good choices w... more👍👍👍👍
- a
- alexcpass50
- Lks
- 17 Jan 2025
The device is ok. But Realme's launch policy is getting confusing. The launch intervals between the 12, 13 and 14 lines are very close. This creates competition between the brand itself.
- T
- The Jack
- YP6
- 17 Jan 2025
What’s the UFS?
- M
- MewoMewo
- X$Q
- 17 Jan 2025
Anonymous, 17 Jan 2025this should have
si/c silicon carbon battery
7+ gen 3 s... moreIt has quad curve display and silicone carbon bettay too.
When it's come 7+ gen 3 it's call small-flagship and flagship killer the price should be higher. You need 7+ gen 3 go with 6T. It's a mid range phone with good camera. 7s gen 3 AnTuTu 8m plus not a bad chipset daily task and casual gaming it's ok it's not a high performance phone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- YT8
- 17 Jan 2025
this should have
si/c silicon carbon battery
7+ gen 3 soc
base 256gb storage
quad curve display
- ?
- Anonymous
- YWi
- 16 Jan 2025
nice
- La fone dumasse
- vx0
- 16 Jan 2025
IpsDisplay, 16 Jan 2025Honestly in reality rich folks have their old phone for 4 t... moreTrue
Correction: fairly rich people (mainly middle classes)
- I
- IpsDisplay
- q98
- 16 Jan 2025
La fone dumasse, 16 Jan 2025"who needs a flagship in 2025 anyways" rich peopl... moreHonestly in reality rich folks have their old phone for 4 to 6 years
Wealthy folks are very stingy with money
It's the middle class and the poor that spent more than they can afford
- La fone dumasse
- vx0
- 16 Jan 2025
"who needs a flagship in 2025 anyways" rich people or guys who want a better phone.
- D
- DavyBoy
- B0f
- 16 Jan 2025
1) The telephoto is 2.5X, not X3.
2) The difference in capturing detail between, normal, pixel binned mode, and hi res mode, is substantial, but hi res is only offered without zooming, at x1 and x2.5 magnification.
3) Colour accuracy is generally excellent, but the algorithms were caught out when I took photos of a railway viaduct built of stone, and floodlit by autumn sunshine. The detail in the stone work looked unnatural under modest enlargement.
4) No 4K video on front camera, and the images are slightly soft.
5) HDR can't be set manually. You can activate it, but it operates on an automatic basis when it's judged necessary. Blocked in shadows in landscape photos or burnt out highlights may occur where otherwise prevented. Not good.