Apple reportedly chooses Alibaba over DeepSeek for AI features in China
- v
- vik457
- LfV
- 17 Feb 2025
Bot10Exists, 14 Feb 2025except for this, you are always wrong about literally every... moreWell haters gonna hate
- A
- Anonymous
- X@m
- 15 Feb 2025
Carol-, 13 Feb 2025Ah, you again talking. Actually china forces them to use on... moreOh illiterate those Chinese AI firms are as good as US ones at fraction of the cost. Get educated
- 🤭
- B
- Bot10Exists
- 0gK
- 14 Feb 2025
Carol-, 13 Feb 2025Well, at least here, you are right.except for this, you are always wrong about literally everything. troll accounts like yours should really be banned
- C
- Carol-
- swE
- 13 Feb 2025
Bot10Exists, 12 Feb 2025I notice a slight right-wing bias here (which is fine) but ... moreWell, at least here, you are right.
- 🤭
- C
- Carol-
- swE
- 13 Feb 2025
Amanda, 12 Feb 2025Please try to follow developments in China when you make ge... moreActually apple most probably choose alibaba because deepseek is quite garbage with no security, privacy or safe content in mind, hack security sepcialist could even open it's database that had no security whatsoever. DeepSeek did a lot of propaganda to take on Chat GPT fast, but in the long run, well they are trash and it already shows.
- 🤣
- C
- Carol-
- swE
- 13 Feb 2025
High.Tech, 12 Feb 2025Are you nuts? Apple can't do sh*t of their own on AI. ... moreAh, you again talking. Actually china forces them to use one of their own AI b.s. research first before talking straight out of trash can.
- ❌
- A
- Amanda
- Bn5
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025No one's forcing Spotify to sell themselves or face a ... moreOld stereotypes are never dying in some rigid brains and so repeating that there is no joint venture requirement for manufacturing in China does not make sense. You may wish to know that Toyota will start building Lexus EV factory in Shanghai soon.
- B
- Bot10Exists
- N51
- 12 Feb 2025
I notice a slight right-wing bias here (which is fine) but with a ridiculous anti-us and pro-china stance. those two things really don't feel connected
- ?
- Anonymous
- Iby
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025Same as US. Either you sell us your company or we will ban you. No one's forcing Spotify to sell themselves or face a ban, and they certainly aren't an American company. Meanwhile, conducting business in China still requires setting up a joint venture with a local company (which they have to control a majority of) unless you have enough money to essentially bribe the government (like Apple and Tesla have done).
- 👍
- ?
- Anonymous
- Iby
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025What tf are you talking about? Try researching from non WES... moreUh, no. The regulations said, "Sell." TikTok didn't sell, so they will be banned for not following the regulations.
- ?
- Anonymous
- YUU
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025What tf are you talking about? Try researching from non WES... moreBoth US and China are the same. But, here in GSMArena, the users is more bias paranoid towards US. Just looked at the comments they reply me. LOL at the for being paranoid bias 🙄🤦🏻♂️
- 👍
- ✔️2
- ?
- Anonymous
- vaS
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025And here people said USA being paranoid. Here your proof Ch... moreWhat tf are you talking about? Try researching from non WESTERN sources why western companies were "restricted" from operating in China. It's related to a T word that I cannot write a out here and western Big Tech refused to comply.
And btw, Tiktok complied with US regulations so they're able to operate in the US. Paranoia is really just one sided.
- 1
- 1989
- DEP
- 12 Feb 2025
"Ali, tell me the result of 1989²"
"Please do not move.... Contacting the party...."
- 👍
- 🤭
- p
- pl2rts
- Sk2
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025This is how to tell that you didn't read the article w... moreIf someone reply on someone comment, then what has article anything to do with it ?
- ❌2
- A
- Amanda
- Bkg
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025And here people said USA being paranoid. Here your proof Ch... morePlease try to follow developments in China when you make general statements. There is NO need to have local partner in China in general area of manufacturing, this requirement has been abolished years ago (think about Tesla for example, do they have local partner there?).
Regarding the AI, the problem is of a different kind due to the AI laws in China which require strict security and safety conformance. That includes also the aspect that AI systems deployed in some area must be politically correct according to the rules of the area.
The article has one aspect which is typical media overhyping: suggesting that DeepSeek lost to Alibaba. This is nonsense, deploying fully tested and *certified* AI system to hundreds of millions of phones in China is absolutely beyond the small research company DeepSeek capabilities. Alibaba surely has such capabilities and their AI models are at the top with nothing precluding using elements of DeepSeek too.
- ✔️
- ❌2
- ?
- Anonymous
- YUU
- 12 Feb 2025
High.Tech, 12 Feb 2025Are you nuts? Apple can't do sh*t of their own on AI. ... moreThis is how to tell that you didn't read the article without telling?
- 👍2
- 👆
- 🤣
- ?
- Anonymous
- rKg
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025And here people said USA being paranoid. Here your proof Ch... moreSame as US. Either you sell us your company or we will ban you.
- 😐
- H
- High.Tech
- X@m
- 12 Feb 2025
Anonymous, 12 Feb 2025And here people said USA being paranoid. Here your proof Ch... moreAre you nuts? Apple can't do sh*t of their own on AI. That's why they have to be in an AI partnership. Just like they had to do with OpenAI.
- 👍
- ❌2
- ?
- Anonymous
- YUU
- 12 Feb 2025
And here people said USA being paranoid. Here your proof China is even extremely paranoid. Everything must have local partner to do business in China 🙄🤦🏻♂️
Well, hypocrite is the best when it comes to GSMArena users making comments 🤦🏻♂️
- 👍