Apple Watch won't face a ban as Apple wins the AliveCor patent case

08 March 2025
The three disputed patents were found to be not patentable.

Sort by:

  • L
  • Liberal Capitalist
  • raM
  • 5 hours ago

Anonymous, 9 hours agoCapitalism... as usual.Stealing intellectual property is anti-capitalism in action.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • CJX
    • 6 hours ago

    I don't know why there has been so much fuss regarding the spo2 sensor. It's not even terribly accurate. I tested my watch for spo2 and there was at least 4-5% difference most of the time. This straight away means it's just a gimmick and should not be used for clinical purposes

      • f
      • fe38ab6
      • r7i
      • 6 hours ago

      AliveCor are upset they can't patent ECGs? I've read the case docs and basically all they wanted was to patent ECG which was invented in 1895.

      Say what you will about Apple, but trying to patent tech invented over 100 years ago is just stupid.

      Maybe they should've tried patenting air or water...

        Anonymous, 9 hours agoIt was alivecor, not masimo.Oop ur right sorry. Same thing still applies though because AliveCor shouldn’t be able to use such a broad patent

          the court got payed. Thats how companies get what they want. But ofcourse the system wont talk about that.

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • rKP
            • 9 hours ago

            DomtheCuber, 08 Mar 2025I hate Apple as a corporation, but I hate Masimo more becau... moreIt was alivecor, not masimo.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • rKP
              • 9 hours ago

              scaramanga89, 08 Mar 2025American court rules in favour of wealthy American company.... moreCapitalism... as usual.

                Rather BAN it othervise we will have someoone else who will found other issues and sed them back to courts.

                  Anonymous, 08 Mar 2025You can't buy every judge, lil bro."lil bro" this guys like 14 lol

                  And I never said every judge was corrupt, but if anyone thinks the legal system doesn't favour large corporations that bring in a tonne of money then idk what to tell you

                    Anonymous, 08 Mar 2025R u there during the trial ?I was reading the articles showing how apple was given every benefit they could. By US law they shouldn't be able to shop watches until everything is cleared but the ruling was changed, changed again, then again

                      American court rules in favour of wealthy American company. What is going on?

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • mFd
                        • 08 Mar 2025

                        Ouifuf, 08 Mar 2025Apple brings in more money so they win by default, did anyo... moreYou can't buy every judge, lil bro.

                          I hate Apple as a corporation, but I hate Masimo more because they’re a greedy health company who’s just trying to exploit patents, so I’m glad Apple won

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • YUU
                            • 08 Mar 2025

                            Ouifuf, 08 Mar 2025Apple brings in more money so they win by default, did anyo... moreR u there during the trial ?

                              iCourt has ruled in Apple's favour.

                                Apple brings in more money so they win by default, did anyone actually think otherwise?

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • mFd
                                  • 08 Mar 2025

                                  Big tech vs big tech is like 2 elephants fighting.

                                  The grass (consumers) end up suffering for it.

                                    1 of 1