Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and Tab S10 FE spotted on Geekbench

21 March 2025
The S25 Edge is expected to launch next month, while the Tab S10 FE is rumored to debut even sooner.

Sort by:

  • u
  • ujjwal chauhan
  • Cb8
  • 22 hours ago

Honestly, it's frustrating to see Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy Tab aiming for premium pricing while offering disappointing performance under the hood. with Samsung choosing a mid-tier chipset that simply doesn’t match the expectations for a 2025 tablet lineup.If Samsung really wanted this to compete with iPads or even solid Android rivals, they should’ve at least gone with a more capable SoC.

    • J
    • Jeffrey Kyle JACKSON
    • TqI
    • 23 Mar 2025

    I heard that, Galaxy Tab S10+ will have 13.1 inch screen. Maybe, it will be OLED... But price is higher than, current FE+ Tablets...

      With benchmarks like that Samsung don't even bother making that Galaxy tab! Quit while ahead!

        Mahmood Albraim, 22 Mar 2025It's not about the results themselves, it's about... moreI feel like nowadays, tech web are going really down. Like their work is no longer good.

          PatrickCzech, 22 Mar 2025Thats why you should never belive benchmarks.It's not about the results themselves, it's about the way GSMA explaining them. That's not similar at all.

            Mahmood Albraim, 22 Mar 2025So first time it scores 3,005/6,945 Second time 2,806/8,41... moreThats why you should never belive benchmarks.

              djdelarosa25 , 22 Mar 2025Retail units of the Tab S10 FE should score around ~1300 fo... moreused tab s9/s9+ will be around the same price and much better value tbh

                • d
                • djdelarosa25
                • y6V
                • 22 Mar 2025

                Retail units of the Tab S10 FE should score around ~1300 for single and ~3900 on multi on Geekbench 6. That's a big jump from the Exynos 1480. The price hike is a shame, though.

                  So first time it scores 3,005/6,945
                  Second time 2,806/8,416
                  And last time 2,969/9,486

                  How come GSMA are calling these numbers "similar"?