Here is the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge pricing breakdown
- m
- majio
- rHc
- 3 hours ago
Things I dont care about: How slim my phone is....
- s
- sixtymes
- 0ag
- 5 hours ago
Too much $. However, if it had the upcoming elite 2 (or equivalent) then I would buy.
- DarlingYext
- 6mM
- 6 hours ago
[deleted post]My Galaxy S8, yes I have one of those too and have used it as my main device for 1 year, has a 3000mAh battery, with a display smaller by almost 1 whole inch than the S25 Edge's display, one that's far less bright and is limited to 60hz and the whole phone is far less powerful, that could barely last 3-4 hours of SoT, no amount of optimization and better efficiency of the chipset can help this new slim device.
On the other hand your comment is nothing but pure insanity and glazing.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 099
- 6 hours ago
Not bad. I was expecting $1500.
- J
- Jesko
- 3JE
- 7 hours ago
Simply stunning.
- T
- Tiramisu
- 7j}
- 7 hours ago
DarlingYext, 11 hours agoMost overpriced phone of the year.True, way too overpriced. In the name of "brand value" and "One Ui" they're selling inferior hardware.
4 months back I paid $900 for a new 512GB S24 ultra without trade-in and I still feel like I overpaid.
- CAKE-BAKER
- rKU
- 8 hours ago
Samsung should have gone for a Silicon Carbide battery. Or , their marketing department should have already had hard numbers on battery life. Simply saying "all-day battery life" makes me doubt that it can last the entire day in normal scenario. 3900 mAh on paper is tiny ! And that too for a 6.7 inch QHD display.
- T
- TeDDy
- nLm
- 8 hours ago
J.M.A, 13 hours agoThey should call S25 slim insteadI suppose Samsung already own the right to use Edge in their name (as for S6 Edge), but not the word Slim which they would have to buy expensively from another company which own the registered trademark.
- E
- ENDERFREAK
- uH}
- 8 hours ago
look I don't know who this device is for but even without comparing to the competition the S25+ is a lot more worth
- DarlingYext
- 6mM
- 9 hours ago
Anonymous, 11 hours agoI have a smaller battery on my two years old Flip5, with a ... moreSounds about as believeable as Samsung themselves saying that this thing will have all day battery life.
- C
- Cpt.Power
- SH3
- 9 hours ago
1400 eur for a phone which wont last half day on heavy usage and with ancient charging speeds.
Samsung went Nuuuuuuuts,
- ?
- Anonymous
- D0i
- 9 hours ago
SOT will get 3 hours. 25 Wat fast charging. Price is beyond one lakh in India. Alas!
- ?
- Anonymous
- uHQ
- 9 hours ago
Stupid device
Cutting thickness sacrificing battery and camera, same weight as vanilla s25
Joke device. R&D shd ve been able to spread the battery cells across the broader footprint.
- A
- Anonymous
- 6p{
- 10 hours ago
Expensive! Better go with s25 ultra instead.
Price should have been $799 at max.
- D
- DVSeal
- iAB
- 10 hours ago
Even if you absolutely have to have a samsung flagship for what ever reason, there is absolutely no reason to get this over the s25+ which is only 1.5mm thicker but you get way more and pay less. But its probably gonna sell like hotcakes because of fake hype and marketing.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7@8
- 11 hours ago
Mills, 11 hours agoUnless Samsung pulls of a miracle, the battery life will be... moreI have a smaller battery on my two years old Flip5, with a 120Hz 6.7" display. It has absolutely no issues getting through a day, and more. I can game for hours and hours straight. Why? Because Samsung knows hardware and more importantly, Samsung knows software.
- Mills
- xFM
- 11 hours ago
Unless Samsung pulls of a miracle, the battery life will be HORRENDOUS. The battery cell barely breaks 4000mAh, paired with the newest SD chip that will surely suck a lot of power, along with a (LTPO) bright QHD+ (1440p) display. Not to mention its 25 watts of charging.
If you're charging iPhone Pro Max money, just buy that or the S25U if you're looking at Samsung already.
- ?
- Anonymous
- y2e
- 11 hours ago
This is such a laughable price, hahaha...