Two Samsung Galaxy S5 versions appear in AnTuTu database
- d
- destroyer
- Nmc
- 09 Feb 2014
if this is really the cpu and gpu specs then sammy can retire really now its suppose to be the next big thing instead getting a s4 tweaked phone with s5 name pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- D
- AnonD-128820
- vQ{
- 09 Feb 2014
Whttt? ? Well my note 3 exynos octa version having kit kat updated scored 36,575 in ANTUTU. I hope its still not the final software built. Before releasing it they definitely optimise it much better to match on par or more with note 3.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4QS
- 09 Feb 2014
The Man , 09 Feb 2014Haters gotta hate. No matter what, Samsung is still on top.... moreExactly
- D
- AnonD-77186
- pq%
- 09 Feb 2014
Here we go again, gazilion S5 models.
- m
- mNiosu
- sp7
- 09 Feb 2014
The Man , 09 Feb 2014Haters gotta hate. No matter what, Samsung is still on top.... moreIf you still consider that Android lags you deserve your stock ROM phone model!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2Tw
- 09 Feb 2014
Samsung might be launching the 2 GB ram model in place of the current i9500 3 G version and just like with S3 the lte model may end up with better ram
- D
- AnonD-124721
- tsA
- 09 Feb 2014
Samsung fans who are also fans of the slow and dated Exynos, who is laughing now? Snapdragon ftw.
- n
- note3
- 3Ps
- 09 Feb 2014
Definitely exynos :)
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4QS
- 09 Feb 2014
AnonD-225661, 09 Feb 2014In fact, the first one displayed the actual power of the s5... moreLOL!!! What some jealous fanboys actually consider logic here....Wow the S4 and Note pushed the SOC a little further to show the POTENTIAL of the SoC. Benchmarks are used to show th POTENTIAL of an SoC. So much worse than non factual camera commercials, monopolizing, illegal scams, and stolen designs ideas and concepts....Not to mention the S4 and Note 3 respectively saw similar results without the tiny bump...Because it was only tiny bumps..At their respective times the still pretty much topped charts with or with out.
People just rather hate and bash though.
- D
- AnonD-19153
- nXF
- 09 Feb 2014
I'm only going to be disappointed if they'll use the same 28nm structure instead ofbri nging something new and smaller :/
- ?
- Anonymous
- pN1
- 09 Feb 2014
I sure hope the Exynos version is the Mini!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3I{
- 09 Feb 2014
QHD is overkill (unless using a magnifying glass) but snapdragon supports LTE
HD suffices but Exynos does not support LTE (now why is that exactly?)
- K
- Kishbatman
- n1H
- 09 Feb 2014
Samsung and their products are bogus . They will break all sorts of benchmark but will have a very poor day to day performance
- a
- arora1308
- Hkq
- 09 Feb 2014
Why the hell we need QHD resolution on 5.2 inch fone..?? It would be better if they concentrate on increasing the quality of display not jus PPI...
- T
- The Man
- N9@
- 09 Feb 2014
Haters gotta hate. No matter what, Samsung is still on top. Of course Android lags but who ever says that the Galaxy s4 lacks like crazy is a big fat liar. One little lag & they all rush to gsma to tell the world that Samsung is s#it. Which phone doesn't lag? How come nobody complains when Sony, Lg or Htc lags.
- D
- AnonD-225661
- ajT
- 09 Feb 2014
In fact, the first one displayed the actual power of the s5, the second one is an s5 hacked to score higher in benchmarks. Classic Samsung tactics.
Of course the row s5 scores lower than the note 3, coz the latter is already hacked
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4QS
- 09 Feb 2014
Anonymous, 09 Feb 2014More bloat rather than function.Sure.......
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4QS
- 09 Feb 2014
AnonD-188372, 09 Feb 2014not at all excited.more samsung tat.the benchmarks will be ... morePreference of build does not equate to quality.
- ?
- Anonymous
- U@L
- 09 Feb 2014
Dual sim and IP58 certification will be critical to its success.