Quad-core Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim quietly launched
- h
- hmyzak
- SXL
- 16 Mar 2014
It is Galaxy Express 2 with just another processor, otherwise still the same...
- 2
- 2Hot2Handle2Good4U
- v0q
- 16 Mar 2014
My God! Could someone impose a law that could stop these manufacturers from spamming the smartphone market? Enough already! Another day, another samsung galaxy.
- s
- samesung
- KxR
- 16 Mar 2014
Samsung is cannibalising the premium galaxy s,n note series into worthless device. Hei jk shin i think youre drunk!!
- m
- mixa
- niM
- 16 Mar 2014
It's clear that Samsung are jealous how the Moto G is doing.
The problem is that, releasing a versiono of an old flagship with lesser specs is lame, no-one will buy that.Ah and where is the 720p screen lol.
- ?
- Anonymous
- p2L
- 16 Mar 2014
samsung is spa.mming phones like nokia and other companies. i wont change my phone until 4-5 years passes after i buy it. companies fooling consumers.
- D
- AnonD-168372
- vpH
- 16 Mar 2014
Exactly the same as the fake China-made S3s sold on the streets of Manila.
- D
- AnonD-92238
- KAe
- 16 Mar 2014
Go drunk Samsung, you're home
- m
- mir
- wu4
- 16 Mar 2014
Samsung is out of control. Someone kick them out of their complacency already!
- ?
- Anonymous
- XMp
- 16 Mar 2014
samsung should stop introducing new variants for outdated model. if this is 's5 slim', go ahead; but this is s3 variants, so just stop it!!! thanks!!
- D
- AnonD-195372
- wrf
- 16 Mar 2014
galaxy junk.... :nohope
- D
- AnonD-112758
- 7Xb
- 16 Mar 2014
Don't make a clone for galaxy s3
- D
- AnonD-9017
- nw7
- 16 Mar 2014
This phone is a joke. Samsung at its best...
The phone itself might actually be good or OK but calling this a «Galaxy S3 slim» is a joke and almost wrongful advertising.
Now, if they did a proper S3 slim, simply doing it slimmer as the name suggests, and I could also do with a smaller screen but not messing around with the rest of the specs and keeping it a true galaxy S3, them I might just went for it.
- a
- antonioli
- P4U
- 16 Mar 2014
I can expect this trash about $400
It's a shame to lauch something like that and branded with S3 name.
- (
- (o-O)
- Hkq
- 16 Mar 2014
AnonD-89109, 16 Mar 2014I don't understand! Is anyone in Samsung keeping a track of... moreYup! More than the universe!..
- (
- (-_o)
- Hkq
- 16 Mar 2014
Now sammy has double the no. Of galaxies than the universe!...
- M
- M and M
- m4I
- 16 Mar 2014
MisterCats, 16 Mar 2014What are you talking about? Specs are always clearly explai... moreI am talking about samsung's habit to name many models according to a flagship to fool people. So instead of selling this junk for about $150 it deserves they will probably sell it for about $300.
- ?
- Anonymous
- p2L
- 16 Mar 2014
Samsung is SPAMming mobile phones just like Nokia and others. Thats why i wont change my phone until 3-5 years after i buy it. They are all jerking customers.
- D
- AnonD-43136
- 39x
- 16 Mar 2014
Absolute rubbish Should just call it the ace 4 as its in that kind of category. Moto g beat this apart from no micro sd. So the galaxy camera should have been called s3 fat?
Should be called the s3 s.h.i.t.e!
- M
- MisterCats
- RHT
- 16 Mar 2014
M and M, 16 Mar 2014Now that 1.2 ghz quadcores and 5mp cameras are old they nee... moreWhat are you talking about? Specs are always clearly explained. I've never come across a customer who had an "oops, it's actually 5MP" moment.
- D
- AnonD-197916
- 4mD
- 16 Mar 2014
here we go again ,,more unwanted phones ,, lol