Nokia 1600
MORE PICTURES

Nokia 1600

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • s
  • some1
  • M%8
  • 10 Jun 2005

at first i thought this phone looked good , but then i saw it has no gprs ,so if ur looking for a low end good fone,this is not it

    • V
    • ViPsHiPs
    • PYe
    • 07 Jun 2005

    I think MP3-grade ringtones sound like a MP3 music, but they aren't MP3. It's not common to have a low-end Nokia with high-quality polyphonic ringtones (20-poly in 1110 and in 1600), so they called MP3 to say that these ringtones are better than the older ones, like those in 2300 and in 3510 (4-poly? disgusting!).

      • j
      • jon
      • mqK
      • 07 Jun 2005

      in answer to the above post, you dont need GPRS to download stuff. just use csd. dial up for the unknowing!

        • T
        • Thanakorn
        • PZI
        • 07 Jun 2005

        This is a basic Phone From Nokia.
        It OK for basic use.
        I Like It

          • s
          • simon
          • 42R
          • 06 Jun 2005

          it could be triband phone and with video camera phone.

            • F
            • Faisel Shah
            • MMy
            • 06 Jun 2005

            This fone is useless! No GPRS, so why has it got 4MB when you can't download anything from wap!!!?

              • A
              • Aatif
              • PF2
              • 06 Jun 2005

              I just want to ask whats the meaning of mp3-grade sound? is it real mp3 or ...how can I transfer tones to this fone from my PC.

                • K
                • Karim
                • mXP
                • 04 Jun 2005

                I think the features of the 3100, combined with the design of this phone, and the camera of 3200, would make the ultimate nokia.

                  • s
                  • sasank
                  • ijY
                  • 04 Jun 2005

                  simply old 2100 in new color ie too only smalles screen.simply basic phone

                    • L
                    • Lethal
                    • mTv
                    • 04 Jun 2005

                    Ya, good phone, though I'm not such a Nokia fan...can anyone tell me what's the difference between the Stn and Cstn display, or is it the same thing?

                      • s
                      • shinoy
                      • iji
                      • 04 Jun 2005

                      good.but cud do better with GPRS

                        • m
                        • mazaher
                        • MuN
                        • 04 Jun 2005

                        i agree with andy
                        This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players n all tht stuff.
                        i got 2600 n i will upgrade to 1600
                        thnx again nokia

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • msB
                          • 04 Jun 2005

                          ok but the screen is so small!
                          the 3100 is so better!
                          the 1600 design is top!!

                            • F
                            • Felipe Cepriano
                            • Pjb
                            • 03 Jun 2005

                            It's dissaponting yes... MP3 Tones, 4 MB memory, NO GPRS?
                            TFT 96x68 Screen? A CSTN 128x128 will be better!

                              • a
                              • andy
                              • jMp
                              • 03 Jun 2005

                              Thank you Nokia for making phones for everyone, not just the super rich. This is a great phone for young kids or people who don't need cameras, MP3 players, etc.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • R5g
                                • 03 Jun 2005

                                Honestly, how can you say that something is disappointing when you haven't even used the thing...

                                  • D
                                  • DoD
                                  • RKn
                                  • 03 Jun 2005

                                  Its not dissapointing,this phone is for people who cant really afford phone like 6680,6681 etc.All phones Are supposed to have different uses

                                    • F
                                    • FSR
                                    • nbq
                                    • 03 Jun 2005

                                    Another disapointing product from nokia !!!!

                                      • D
                                      • DoD
                                      • RKn
                                      • 03 Jun 2005

                                      what do they mean by MP3 grade?well,if it has mp3 I might buy this phone,Any way cool design..

                                        • G
                                        • Ghazani
                                        • PIb
                                        • 03 Jun 2005

                                        this fone loooking nice but i m afraid about nokia i can,t uner stand why nokia made thissssss look lik 2600 any body can tell me about its prise i prefer nec 606