Nokia 2600 classic
- A
- Alok dubey
- vGe
- 10 Mar 2008
It has only 10 mb memory n it is non expandale,it as spt 2g ntwork,,,it has nice look..bt wth les ftrs
- ?
- Anonymous
- wc6
- 08 Mar 2008
well, this phone is cool but i got a better version of this hpone, 2620. this phone is sold at RM330 and 2620 is sold at RM360 (original phones). the difference is just that one's housing is exhangeAble and fatter; the other one is slimmer but housing not exchangeable`
- m
- madeeha
- upq
- 08 Mar 2008
how many messages can this cell save in inbox?
- ?
- Anonymous
- ibX
- 07 Mar 2008
lav this phone....just bought for my mun today...
- P
- Prince Gabula Farouk
- Sc5
- 07 Mar 2008
i've the original nokia 2600 but would like to know the cost of nokia 2600 classic.
i've liked the nokia 2600s that's why feel that should buy the classic one.
thanks
- G
- Geniusbami
- SY4
- 05 Mar 2008
Just got this phone 2day at N10,500. It's value for its price. Quite good; all a low-end modern phone shd have.
GSM Arene, Pls, change the status to 'available'. Thanks.
- D
- DeeDee
- UD%
- 05 Mar 2008
I just bought mine last night and I just love it! : ) Nice sounds & pic quality is ok. So far the only thing that's not so ok is it takes time sometimes to view or go to certain menus/folders in the phone. And that it isnt tri band and has less memory. But other than that, it is very user friendly, nice style, thin but comy on the hand...a great mobile for such a low price tag : ) Id recommend anybody to buy this!
- s
- shazia basheer
- Rxf
- 04 Mar 2008
this nokia 2600 classic is out staniding..and affordable..clear voice..every thing which i want is available on this fone...camera result is outstanding...i will reccommend all users to buy this mobile,
- ?
- Anonymous
- ib1
- 03 Mar 2008
this is vry nice phone.
i looked in borders at
The Curve & Berjaya Time Squre
it vry cool n chip
i like it
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2TH
- 02 Mar 2008
this fone is very cool....low end fone wid some unexpected highend features...people who r against it r completely blind n nuts..!!..its stylish and gud lookin...
- m
- mbs
- PSY
- 01 Mar 2008
true, this fone is very ugly...and lack a lot of cool features.
BUT, for a price of less than $100, what can u expect? a ton of features? if u need a nicer phone, Nokia has a complete line up of models tailored fit on various genre, applications and most importantly, price. As for my 13 year old boy, he is quite satisfied with this model.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pFj
- 28 Feb 2008
cheap phone
- A
- Adit38
- M@T
- 28 Feb 2008
S40v5 ??
Really....
Thats mean this low end phone has blacklist like other high end s40v5 phone right?
This phone cooler than 2630 which is s40v3.
Does anybody try it? Is it fast respone?
- ?
- Anonymous
- PRZ
- 27 Feb 2008
Price vs Features - Motorola W230 is so much better. No offence Nokia users - I am a Nokia user myself .... however I bought Motorola W230 for my wife.
- S
- Suck Phone
- PFJ
- 22 Feb 2008
2630 = 2600 Classic
Wasting the money.
- L
- Lucy
- iBt
- 20 Feb 2008
bit wierd to see a phone in cream colour. I agree with the person that said that phones are not all-in-one gadgets, but still I would get a better one, just knowing there are loads of them offered by Nokia and all companies.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0xV
- 19 Feb 2008
If you use common sense, you see, that this phone is not that ugly in all senses. And above all else it's a PHONE. If people expect a gadget to have all features of, let's say, 500$ "phone" and pay for it few bucks, they should get their heads checked. Phone is supposed to be phone, not a wireless/coffee-cooking/dog-walking/all-in-one/good-for-nothing toy.
- h
- herry
- wrH
- 17 Feb 2008
wow that good....... n very want to my wife
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2Ap
- 14 Feb 2008
US is using gsm 850/1900. this cannot be used there.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0ma
- 09 Feb 2008
yes! it has a bluetooth but look at the specification of this phone it lacks many features which is ugly and looks like the old phone of Nokia! No changes at all!