Nokia 3110 Evolve
- T
- Tapas Manohari
- U2e
- 24 Dec 2007
Its battery quality is very good and it is a combination of many features but its design is not attractive
- s
- silly-hacker
- v0X
- 24 Dec 2007
i guess because the 3110 classic's program sucks.. it hangs, it restarts.. like duh!
i hope this one's different.. anyway goodluck to those whose gonna buy it..
- R
- Rook
- RJd
- 23 Dec 2007
Nokia, shame shame shame.
3110C = 3110E No real differences to the consumer.
Nokia's marketing strategy these days simply seems to be flooding the market with a million different handsets, crossing their fingers, and hoping that the consumer will be so bamboozled that they might actually buy one...
- J
- JBanks
- T2%
- 23 Dec 2007
Did I just read it right??? Nokia gave the name "Evolve" to a Tri-Band phone!! This really is a lack of braining here and really the fast-food kind of products in telecom, I'm tired of it. I'm sick of seeing that us consumers are being abused and brained washed/duped by their marketing science.
- D
- Dani
- nER
- 23 Dec 2007
Nokia make soo many Phones i cant keep up!
this 3110 is just another pass time phone for Nokia..............nothing special
- a
- amit
- w4p
- 21 Dec 2007
its a nice phone including all latest feature . its a good vatrient of giant nokia corporation.
- M
- Maverick
- vGA
- 21 Dec 2007
The java apps are installed in Gallery
- E
- Engy
- n9j
- 19 Dec 2007
@ UqqX
BL5C battery is no fraud.. I had 6030 with BL5C that I charged for 13 hours on each day of the first three days from buying my mobile, and then I had to charge it only 3 times per month.. It used to last for ten days with heavy radio use (1.5 hour per day at least), extended game play (half an hour daily) 2 or 3 msgs per day and 5 to 10 minute calls per day.. It was real awsome.. I'd buy a phone for this battery if it is 970 mAh or more!
- ?
- Anonymous
- PSw
- 19 Dec 2007
What's the difference between this and 3110 classic?
- b
- billy^budd
- 0pr
- 19 Dec 2007
i have the classic which im very happy with and seems to have all the same ingredients and be better looking.
it apperas to have "evolved" into a cheap looking version...one word...why?
- ?
- Anonymous
- UD}
- 19 Dec 2007
no 3g! nah..
- N
- Niki
- 0nn
- 18 Dec 2007
The phone has very good desine, a low resolution display don't consume a lot of energy, good for simple users :) 2630 is better ;)
- ?
- Anonymous
- Mx@
- 18 Dec 2007
exactly why are people saying the've got this phone or had it since August, why lie? its not out, simple. If you're saying you've tested it then fine but dont talk about it on a day to day running basis because you dont know. And the people who come on here to bash a phone because it hasnt got this or that. People who know alot more about marketing than you or i plan these things and aim at a specific market segment. If you're not in it then look at another handset and stop insulting this one because it doesnt have everything you want.
- u
- uCh3 b3LGiUm
- fuL
- 18 Dec 2007
if Nokia still thinks of staying on top with this scrap, believe me they are not going to make 4th place cos this phone is a disgrace to Nokia. customers are xpecting much more than a 128 x 160 pixels screen, this is an advanced world where everybody want to share wat they see in everyday life and i dont think this is possible wit this scrap
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2SU
- 18 Dec 2007
if i install java applications, where will it be saved???
- ?
- Anonymous
- Uqq
- 17 Dec 2007
nokia stiil using bl 5c
doing fraud
- D
- Dani
- mXZ
- 17 Dec 2007
good battery life ?
LOL its got nothing to drain the battery ......
- a
- arslan rasool
- ypm
- 16 Dec 2007
the most awesme cell i evr saw n robust too.i realy want to see in my hand.its desirous.
- i
- igor
- prQ
- 16 Dec 2007
itt's realy great and the batery is fantastic
- D
- Dani
- mXZ
- 15 Dec 2007
its Evolve'd WOOWWW!
Nokia .thumbs down