Nokia 6103
- ?
- Anonymous
- TS}
- 08 Mar 2006
i think this NK6103 same as NK6101
- c
- cingular_rep
- 4Fh
- 02 Mar 2006
Well it doesn't matter how many more bands the phone has.... in the USA we only use 850/1900mhz anything extra would be for overseas roaming...Does it cost them that much? probably not....but what you have to realize is that International capability is a high end feature and most likely if the phone has this is also going to have another high end feature to it....and yes the complete package will jack up the price...I'm telling you right now...NOKIA tends to work the best out of most manufacurers. The 6102 has given us a very good customer feedback (there is always a lime here and there) but as a whole nokia is pretty realiable.... PS. the older and simpler the NOKIA the better they seem to work LOL....
- K
- Kenny
- 4sb
- 02 Mar 2006
WHY NOBODY ANSWERS THE QUESTION?
Everyone here screams like he is a big technology freak, but no one can answer the question about GSM frequency added into a cell phone?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4sb
- 25 Feb 2006
QUESTION FOR EVERYONE:
How do extra frequencies are added into a cell phone? Does it really cost to Nokia extra $100 to make 850/1800/1900 phone instead of 850/1900?
Cheap Nokia USA phones are not bad. They cost around $100, and have a good quality.
But they always have only american frequencies (850/1900). Any Nokia phone that has 1800 or 900 or both as well, will cost at least $200.
IS THIS A $$$$$$$$ Stragedy to Push more expensive phones, or does the extra frequency really cost so much?????????????????????????
- j
- jo
- Pv9
- 24 Feb 2006
LOOK:
6103 for american version 850/1800/1900
quote: ( "by mistake 900 is missing)
(also, "by mistake 1.3 megapixel junk is missing)
900 is NOT USED IN NORTH AMERICA!!!!
is not missed, is just not so needed. a triband phone is enough to go almost anywhere. and sometimes is used just to retrain the phones and not being sold outside it destined region.
the 6101 had a VGA because VGA last year was supposed to mid range phones but every year it goes up a level. so now they have 1.3mpx. they did not forget it!! is just strategy.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4sb
- 20 Feb 2006
BYTHEWAY:
Do you know why Nokia, Samsung and Sony produce so many new models for the last two years and alot of them have similar design?
(just look at Nokis flip/clamshell, 6101, 6103, 6125, etc...)
SIMPLE BECAUSE, all previous year models SUCK! So Nokia, Samsung and Sony have to pump up tones of new models, to fool people.
People will think, that since there are all new models this year, they will have better quality ( HAHA, NO THEY WON'T!).
NOW LOOK AT
Sharp and Panasonic phones range very carefuly. They haven't produced so many new models, because their old models work perfectly.
ENOUGH?
DUH!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4sb
- 18 Feb 2006
I have no doubt lately, that it's a$$$$$$$
$$$$$ rip off stragedy with Nokia and all other brands. And they do it, because it's already prooved to be successful.
LOOK:
6103 for american version 850/1800/1900
( "by mistake 900 is missing)
(also, "by mistake 1.3 megapixel junk is missing)
NOW LOOK AT:
6125 (probably will cost at least $50 more, due to 1.3 megapixel junk sensor), and the phone is quadband! (850/900/1800/1900)
NOKIA KNOWS, that because people are stupid and will want 1.3mp junk , and will want quad band - most of them will buy 6125 and only few will buy 6103).
BYTHEWAY:
I hope that after you buy either 6103 or 6125, you can hear people well on those phones ( The phones are as thin as Nokia 6101). Nokia 6101 is not loud enough!
NOKIA 6170 IS THE WAY TO GO.
THE ONLY PHONE THAT HAS GOOD QUALITY AND NOT OVERPRICED (LOUD SOUND-THICK PHONE! DUH!)
- t
- texas
- Re2
- 16 Feb 2006
yes they are planning a similar 3g handset actually 2 6131 6136
- S
- Shadrachina Kliteris
- Mne
- 08 Feb 2006
I like this phone a lot, but does anyone know if Nokia has any plans to bring out a similar 3G handset?
- r
- rashmi
- 4WY
- 07 Feb 2006
gawd, just bought it yesterday - not sure if it was a great move. cingular here sells it at a good rate but the WAP based service is completely abominable-i think it is for teenagers-can u belive i could play a DJ anc compose music ..
I mean what was nokia thinking??
..the sony ericsson is much better. u can't simply allure a customer with a fancy camera and MMS. I
- J
- JJT
- RKp
- 01 Feb 2006
you know wat pips.. we are on the date and updated here in the philippines when we are talking about nokia staff cellphones.. damn thats the 1 thing i like in the philippines.. and by the way we are the capital text messaging user in the world.. hehehe thats y theres a no doubt we are up to date cellphones here.. FILIPINO RULES!!!!
- J
- JJT
- RKp
- 01 Feb 2006
yes!! this phone is just an ordinary phone.. basically fits for the girls who are in middle class.. but still its good and stable.. durability is on this phone.. we already have this phone here in the philippines since the 3rd quarter of 2005, actually my mom already have this kind of fone. well thats what i can say its durable stable easy to use phone.. but you forgot it also had a screen on the front..
- k
- kalcool
- jc}
- 17 Jan 2006
With 65k color sceern, only 4mb memory and ugly antena, its basically a Low-end phone with Mid-range price.
- ?
- Anonymous
- ixc
- 16 Jan 2006
The Nokia 6125 will cost just 30 euros more, and it is full of features that the 6103 won't have (plus, a better design without external antenna). I don't see ANY reason whatsoever to buy this phone over a superior 6125.
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_6125-1409.php
- I
- Iv
- niX
- 15 Jan 2006
http://www.mobi.kz/mobiles/nokia/6103.html - they write that this phon will be available only in 2nd quarter, is it true?
- s
- shamm ee
- Md4
- 14 Jan 2006
i loove his phone
- N
- Nokia 6103
- P%r
- 13 Jan 2006
this phone looks awesome!!! i was gonna get the 6101 about 2 months ago, but i didn't get it bcoz i didn't have enough, so know i am gonna wait for it to come out in Australia!!!
i was gonna buy the 5140i but this phone is a flip phone! HAS BLUETOOTH and is an awesome little phone!!!! Buy it for sure!!!
- C
- Cesaritox
- Pve
- 12 Jan 2006
It's a good mid-range phone with a low memory I mean, for mp3 tones, it's too low, at least it should have 12mb like SE K300.
The display is brighter and fast responsive, a TFT 65k, but in sun sometimes it sucks.
Adding bluetooth to it, is useless for me,They should have do it from the very beginning with Nokia 6101, I see nonsense to added in a new mobile phone with the same specifications and same shape.
- w
- wow LOL !
- mXB
- 11 Jan 2006
this phone takes me back to the year 2001 great features 3 colours on the screen at least 5 megs of memory that well keep you busy ages its even got a front colour screen so you can always see the trusting clocking LOL ! but always remember there are other phones out there at this price with 2 mega pixle cames mp3 super screen 3g memory cards and loads more
- .
- .......
- P5K
- 10 Jan 2006
wtf man?Is this 2002 or something....