Nokia 6210
- b
- beckett1
- 27 Jul 2001
I have had my 6210 for about a month now and it is good apart from slow menus, loose battery (which is anoying) and txt msg's r not that good
- n
- nashwa
- 10 Jul 2001
i have one its very good
- b
- beer
- 02 Jul 2001
Perfect phone in the world
- s
- sushi-x
- 20 May 2001
i just got one a few days ago... its a great phone with some setbacks, for instance, its has poor backlighting and its takes quite a while for menus to be dislayed once pressed. It's screen display is not compatible with other nokia phones, this makes it impossible to view pictures made from text characters. Its large memory makes up for these though... no other phone has this capacity... i think...
- t
- tonibg
- 04 May 2001
The Best !!!
- G
- George
- 25 Apr 2001
So far So good, I hope that the phone do better than I knew, knowing that the 6210 is one of the best but still to go...
- P
- Pedro Rosa
- 25 Apr 2001
The Best of the serie 6!
- D
- Desmond(real one)
- 22 Apr 2001
--------------------------------
What can I say - this guy loves ny name - and uses it instead of me
--------------------------------
But he is right by the way - a good phone. Lot's of features - relatively good price
- D
- Desmond
- 21 Apr 2001
Great phone! Excellent sound quality and signal reception...added to the cool calendar feature (up to 200+ entries)
- S
- Shane Skinner
- 17 Apr 2001
HaHahHaHa is a big egg
Hahahahahahahahaha
- H
- HaHahHaHa
- 05 Apr 2001
Shane Skinner is a big egg
Hahahahahahahahaha
- A
- Adam Gelderbloem
- 04 Apr 2001
The best phone I have ever used. It is the ultimate communication tool.Fits in perfectly within a mobile office framework
- J
- José António Almeida
- 02 Apr 2001
A very stylish, nice and performante mobile phone!!! One of the best in the moment!
- S
- Salman
- 10 Mar 2001
If you assign caller group to any phone book entry the call waiting from that number does not beep. I sold that set because of this very reason. Secondly some times for some reason the vibration alert does not work
- P
- Pritesh
- 27 Feb 2001
The nokia 6210 may look nice and very sexy but dont be fooled by its appearance because for starters u cannot get caller groups on the phone for some reason.Also the phone cannot accept sms messages which are picture one.It does accept picture picture messages but not messages that are picture which are made up from characters.Pity that is such a nice phone as well owell hope they release a nice phone which acctually works properly nex time
- G
- Gaurav Puri
- 20 Jan 2001
The best I have ever used. I have earlier used Panasonic 93 andSony Z-5, J-5 but this is just excellent. The phone feels great in the hand and has a very functional user friendly menu system. The fastest wap ever. I did not find the menu slow or troublesome. Excellent decision if any one wants to purchase the phone.
- V
- Viran Patel
- 09 Jan 2001
I have the 6210 (UK) and it allows data rates up to 43.2kbps if you subscribe to the network's High Speed Data services.
A good data phone.
- A
- Ata
- 29 Dec 2000
Well, a very nice phone, but the standby time is not a lot more than 3 days (if not turned off meanwhile) for me and it reacts to the network provider changes (when travelling for xample) a LOT slower than my 6110 - maybe the internal antenna is responsible for this. The animated SMSes are not displayed correctly and the phone sometimes freezes with the 3.04 software version...
- f
- finlay
- 19 Dec 2000
Just upgraded to 6210 on Orange network in UK (from 6150). Surely the ultimate business phone of the moment? Proper IrDA Infra-Red, built in fax modem, WAP browser, high-speed data (HSCSD), huge memory for names/SMS, vibrating alert, T9 predictive text, much improved calendar, voice dialling - all this functionality puts other Nokia phones to shame. And it's compatible with all my accessories... It may seem slow to respond, but you don't have to wait for the screen to update before pressing another button to navigate around. And I find the battery life impressive. Definitely more functionality than hype!
- o
- ogun peynirci
- 11 Dec 2000
it's very good.there's not more better