Nokia 6220
- L
- Leo L.
- 02 Apr 2003
The 6220 buttons sure don't look that sexy, but that's not their goal. I would bet that they are easier to operate than most phones. Some of the Sony phones have tiny, tiny, tiny buttons that basically suck. Bravo for big buttons!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 01 Apr 2003
nokia think they smart right?
This phone shouda been da 6610.
Same features just a lil bigger memory and integrated camera. shame on you!
- H
- Hon Lin
- 29 Mar 2003
i think the features are great, but then button is digusting. This future ultimate phone would be losing points for it's buttons.....
- a
- anonymous
- 29 Mar 2003
Shut up.. the guy under me. u utterly disgraced the face of singapore.. have u got any brains to think u are talking to everyone in the world. Btw, we give comments to improve one's mine and also to inspire their creativity. If thats the case, they why they still set up a 'Read opinion' section here? This is the reason behind it. So now shut that gap
- A
- A guy from singapore
- 27 Mar 2003
ohh 1 more thing its all up to u if ur gonne buy this phone or not but dont give a damn shit comment here ...:P
- A
- A guy from singapore
- 27 Mar 2003
hey u all suckss. u all just know how to say something bad about someone's morbile or something.... this is a man made morbile sure have lots of problem man.. even the lagendary titanic sinked... so my point is everthing that made my human hands always have a problem so dont be a fool to give comments about one's creations.
- L
- Leo Laporte isa blok
- 27 Mar 2003
TO GSMARENA :
Would you please consider listeding the Interface release and interface version in the features section? For instance this phone uses Nokia Series 40. This will become increasing important as phone technologies progress..
Thanks for listing the other features-- this phone has what I want..
Gratefully,
LLLLLL
- N
- Nokia Fan
- 26 Mar 2003
It looks like 6200 but there is a dofference:
Nokia 6220 has an Integrated Digital camera.
Nokia 6200 doesn't have it
- .
- ..//..
- 26 Mar 2003
Nice... SynchML, finally!
- L
- Leo Laporrticus
- 26 Mar 2003
Looks like a well balanced package to me. Lighter than the 3650 but with a nice classic keyboard. I could do without the camera however and will probably be buying a 6610.. Nokia should have a non-camera model, to help us shave $100 off the cost.
(Hmm... I wonder why my previsous post was removed by the gsmarena staff? Is there censureship going on this website??)
- T
- TOYOTA FREAK
- 26 Mar 2003
Jakov what is inportent cam or quality?? and always the same design from all Nokia's phones.Do you think about it?
- J
- Jakov
- 24 Mar 2003
Shut up.This phone has better cam then X70 and GD87,it is like 7250,but it has better MMS(sound),and few better apps.Looks stylish,not in one-year trend.
- .
- .
- 22 Mar 2003
what is the diff between this and 6610..
- M
- Mike
- 21 Mar 2003
...and another Nokia that looks exactly the same as ALL the other Nokia models! Don't they have any imagination?!?!?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 20 Mar 2003
it looks like 6200
- C
- Craig B
- 19 Mar 2003
The design is too much like other Nokia Phones and looks to dull. If you want a good camera phone I think there are better ones out there i.e. Panasonic GD87
- c
- chidi
- 19 Mar 2003
This is the plenipotent gsm phone
- L
- Leo Laporte
- 18 Mar 2003
Looks like a well balanced phone-- with a classic keyboard design. A better and lighter package than the 3650. Bluetooth and IDRA are unnecessary features and real costs, simply obviated by the info cable.
- /
- /,./,./
- 17 Mar 2003
92 grams is too heavy stupid ME !!!
- n
- noels
- 17 Mar 2003
another same design and a bit of different feature from nokia!!!!!!!!!!!like a pain in da arse!!