Nokia 6720 classic
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0UZ
- 21 Feb 2009
hey man i really love the icons on the new nokias....like 6720 classic.can i put them on nokia n79 somehow>>with software update or something..someone pls tell me.tnxxx in advice
- O
- Original_Jamaican
- kiQ
- 21 Feb 2009
jemray2099, 16 Feb 2009This reminds me of 6233. I wonder if it is successor for it...JEMRAY I was saying the same thing. It has a striking resemblance of 6233. Even though I saw the photos earlier this week, the thought never grabbed me until I watched a video presentation with it just now at Nokia's Europe website showcasing the activities at the MWC in Barcelona. Even the materials look the same. I wouldn't be surprised if it's just as loud too with those big speaker grills.
- f
- f
- nCb
- 20 Feb 2009
Zzzz, 17 Feb 2009Strange, no Xenonflash, video at only 15fps...Why this phon... moreabout the video recording, gsmarena probably made a typo bcoz in the overview of the nokia in mwc, it said in the 6710 nav that "the camera has gone from 3 to 5 megapixels but video recording remains unchanged" so 6710 must have the vga 15fps video recorder and the 6720 vga 30fps video.
- J
- Jay
- 3LX
- 20 Feb 2009
Wow, this is the worst design ive ever seen. Im disapointed nokia.
- R
- Robert
- 0xQ
- 20 Feb 2009
In 6220c is xenon flash, 30 fps recording, bet baterry is very bad
In 6720c is better baterry
- 1
- 100% JP
- mMU
- 20 Feb 2009
what's the different between 6720 classic & 6220 classic??
- ?
- Anonymous
- PUM
- 19 Feb 2009
my 6220 is better ! Xenon , 30fps plus looks
- D
- Dani
- nEw
- 19 Feb 2009
The 6220 Classic has terrible build quality, the keypad and cover cracks within 2 weeks!
- ?
- Anonymous
- tVH
- 18 Feb 2009
OMG
Ewwwww! It looks gross! Nothing special except for the price I believe!
Same old same old...
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2SM
- 17 Feb 2009
no wi-fi is dissappointing...
if there was wi-fi in this phone... it would sell in greater volumes..
i like this phone... n i am willing to wait for this phone..
- s
- sinaga
- inV
- 17 Feb 2009
i this goin into Indonesian market?? hows that hassan aula?
- Z
- Zzzz
- uk}
- 17 Feb 2009
Strange, no Xenonflash, video at only 15fps...Why this phone when the 6220 classic is better ?? Maybe because of the terrible build quality of the 6220...
- ?
- Anonymous
- M3s
- 17 Feb 2009
The battery is 5 hours more play time - 8hrs talk time compared to the 6220 having 3.5 hours
- h
- haaaaynaku!
- RKn
- 17 Feb 2009
this is a carbon copy of 6220 classic but even then 6220 classic is much better than this 6720 pweeh classic. Just put wi-fi onto 6220 classic that would be monster medium range phone.
- k
- kimkum
- uEy
- 17 Feb 2009
Ugly look..ugly look.... Nokia is always the champion gor ugly look.
- a
- albert
- wHT
- 17 Feb 2009
if u plan to get this model...forget it!!!!~~~
6220classic has the exact same specification and even better in fact....
6220classic has camera cover and xenon flash and the price by now is reli reli reli low...
- a
- albert
- wHT
- 17 Feb 2009
an exact make of 6220 classic.....but created brand new to squeeze some juicy cash from consumerssss!!!!!!
- D
- Dani
- nGA
- 16 Feb 2009
6233 sucessor?
- ?
- Anonymous
- uSQ
- 16 Feb 2009
More likely the NOkia 6220 wihthout the lens conver and xenon flash.
- r
- r.akeb
- mJU
- 16 Feb 2009
nokia 6720 copy 6220 also 6210 ...............ok no bad