OnePlus X review: Straight Up
Straight Up
Performance
The OnePlus X runs on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset with 3GB of LPDDR3 RAM. On paper, this might not seem so exciting but again, this isn't exactly a flagship device. Plus we've seen the Snapdragon 801-powered smartphones to still hold high positions in our benchmark charts.
GeekBench 3 shows multi-core performance of the four Krait 400 cores is expectedly behind the competition, which relies on octa-core processors. The Galaxy A5, which has a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU is the only inferior device. And while the OnePlus X has the same chipset as the original OnePlus One, its processors is down 200MHz and thus the score difference.
GeekBench 3
Higher is better
-
Meizu MX5
5110 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
3554 -
Huawei P8
3380 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
3321 -
HTC One A9
3209 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
2683 -
OnePlus One
2663 -
OnePlus X
2297 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1460
The compound AnTuTu benchmark puts the OnePlus X in the middle, right by the HTC One A9 side, which is also about right (Snapdragon 617). The top three devices offer much better and modern chipsets.
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Huawei P8
50876 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
50875 -
Meizu MX5
48915 -
HTC One A9
40631 -
OnePlus X
39990 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
38786 -
Oppo R7
29452 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
21581
BaseMark OS II 2.0 compound test gauges lots of stuff including processing power, graphics, system, web and memory. The OnePlus X overall score is just as great as the S808-powered Xiaomi Mi 4i and the Helio X10 powered Meizu MX5. This clearly shows the S801 is still quite a relevant platform.
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
Meizu MX5
1252 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
1233 -
OnePlus One
1230 -
OnePlus X
1213 -
Huawei P8
1112 -
HTC One A9
944 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
860 -
Oppo R7
757 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
569
The CPU breakdown of the BaseMark 2.0 test clearly demonstrate the dominance of the Krait processor among the single-core performance, but it lags behind the octa-core setups when it comes to all-round CPU stress test.
Basemark OS 2.0 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 4c
5739 -
OnePlus X
5118 -
OnePlus One
5108 -
Huawei P8
3684 -
Meizu MX5
3262 -
HTC One A9
2753 -
Oppo R7
2452 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
2065 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1861
Basemark OS 2.0 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Huawei P8
23676 -
Meizu MX5
22976 -
OnePlus One
19625 -
HTC One A9
19160 -
OnePlus X
16983 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
14276 -
Oppo R7
9755 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
7891 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
7492
Adreno 330 was considered a flagship GPU among the 2014 smartphones and it sure behaves fabulously under 1080p display, such is the case with the OnePlus X. It lacks native support for OpenGL ES 3.1, which makes the Adreno 330 not as future-proof as we would have liked.
Anyway, the Adreno 330 does very good on the offscreen and onscreen test, outdone only by the new Adreno 418 in the S808 (Xiaomi Mi 4c) and the PowerVR G6200 in the MediaTek's Helio X10 (Meizu MX5, Xperia M5).
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 4c
35 -
OnePlus One
28.3 -
Meizu MX5
27 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
23 -
OnePlus X
22 -
HTC One A9
16 -
Oppo R7
15 -
Huawei P8
10 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
5.3
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 4c
15 -
OnePlus One
12.1 -
Meizu MX5
10 -
OnePlus X
9.9 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
8.4 -
HTC One A9
6.4 -
Oppo R7
5.9 -
Huawei P8
5.4 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1.8
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 4c
35 -
OnePlus One
30 -
Meizu MX5
27 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
24 -
OnePlus X
23 -
HTC One A9
17 -
Oppo R7
15 -
Huawei P8
10.7 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
9.6
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 4c
15 -
OnePlus One
12.9 -
OnePlus X
10 -
Meizu MX5
9.5 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
8.7 -
HTC One A9
6.7 -
Oppo R7
5.9 -
Huawei P8
5.7 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
3.9
BaseMark X is another GPU benchmark, which surprisingly puts the OnePlus X's Adreno 330 around the top of the chart. The OnePlus One is taking the first spot here, but its GPU is probably be running at a slightly higher clock and thus the difference.
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
OnePlus One
13129 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
12096 -
OnePlus X
10572 -
Meizu MX5
10403 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
7780 -
HTC One A9
6617 -
Huawei P8
6307 -
Oppo R7
5382 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1897
Finally, we ran the JavaScript Kraken bench and the compound BrowserMark 2.1 test on the Chrome browser of the OnePlus X. The device demonstrated great capabilities on both tests.
Kraken 1.1
Lower is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 4c
4506 -
OnePlus One
7008 -
OnePlus X
7295 -
HTC One A9
11069 -
Oppo R7
11257 -
Meizu MX5
11414 -
Huawei P8
11867 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
13083 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
25088
BrowserMark 2.1
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 4c
2113 -
HTC One A9
1562 -
Meizu MX5
1471 -
Oppo R7
1433 -
OnePlus X
1406 -
OnePlus One
1339 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
1203 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1171 -
Huawei P8
764
The OnePlus X is actually quite impressive in terms of performance. Snapdragon 801 might seem long in the tooth now but being an 800 series chipset it still packs a punch and handily blows the Snapdragon 615 (Oppo R7), seen on some of the rival devices, out of the water. The phone worked smoothly and apps ran quickly. The overall performance during our review process was definitely impressive and assuming it is able to maintain that over a period it shouldn't be a cause for concern to anyone.
Reader comments
- Anonymous
- 02 May 2021
- DkA
Is it volte support
- Anonymous
- 12 Feb 2020
- sXV
Yes
- Giri
- 01 Sep 2019
- D0Y
Is this phone support 4g Sim?