OnePlus 3T review: Digitally remastered
Digitally remastered
Snapdragon 821 is faster all around
As already mentioned, OnePlus focused its efforts on upgrading the internals of the handset. Some aspects of this hardware refresh are a little bit more visible than others, like the new 128GB storage option or the higher megapixel front camera. The new Snapdragon 821 chipset is a little bit harder to distinguish from its Snapdragon 820 sibling at first glance. However, it does constitute a notable upgrade all around.
Firstly, there is the matter of the higher max clock rate of two of the Kryo cores inside. Admittedly, this probably won't have groundbreaking effect on real-world performance. But in a benchmark scenario, where the CPU is being pushed to the limit, the difference definitely shows.
GeekBench 4 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Huawei Honor 8
5447 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
5245 -
OnePlus 3T
4364 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
4333 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
4130 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
4128 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4053 -
OnePlus 3
4045 -
ZTE Axon 7
3990 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3987 -
Nubia Z11
3926 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
3885 -
Meizu MX6
3070
GeekBench 4 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
1890 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
1854 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
1815 -
Nubia Z11
1755 -
Huawei Honor 8
1720 -
OnePlus 3
1719 -
ZTE Axon 7
1702 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
1696 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
1694 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1682 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
1551 -
Meizu MX6
1550 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
843
Looking at GeekBench, we can clearly see the OnePlus 3T hold its own and easily surpass its OnePlus 3 sibling. The Samsung Galaxy S7 and the Huawei Mate 8 seem to be enjoying better multi-core optimization with their respective custom chipset solutions. However, as far as Snapdragon 820 devices go, we can clearly see the OnePlus 3 blows away contenders like the Qualcomm-powered Galaxy S7 and the Xiaomi Mi 5. The OnePlus 3T is even better at it.
GeekBench 3 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Huawei P9 Plus
6660 -
Huawei P9
6558 -
Meizu Pro 6
6427 -
Huawei Honor 8
6380 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
6360 -
Huawei Mate 8
6323 -
OnePlus 3T
5956 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
5566 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
5543 -
OnePlus 3
5520 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
5420 -
LG G5
5362 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
5358 -
Nubia Z11
5249 -
Meizu MX6
5215 -
LeEco Le Max 2
5026
GeekBench 3 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
2560 -
OnePlus 3
2383 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
2345 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
2345 -
LG G5
2328 -
Nubia Z11
2313 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2312 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
2305 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 -
LeEco Le Max 2
2118 -
Meizu Pro 6
1905 -
Huawei P9 Plus
1892 -
Huawei Honor 8
1831 -
Huawei P9
1819 -
Meizu MX6
1724
Sure, Huawei's silicon appears to be acing multi-core performance tests along with some rare MediaTek chipsets such as the Helio X25. However, within the popular Qualcomm realm, nothing can currently compete with the raw power of the Snapdragon 821.
But, chances are, most users aren't going to be running a lot of complex mathematical computations on their new phone. Luckily, performance boosts in the OnePlus 3T extend beyond simple number-crunching power to deliver a more fluent and pleasant experience as a whole.
A quick look at the all-round AnTuTu benchmark, clearly shows the OnePlus 3T is ahead of the pack. Also, something as simple as a real-life application launch time test next to the older OnePlus 3 or many other contemporary Android devices, often shows a significant improvement (granted, not scientifically measured).
AnTuTu 6
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
165097 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
155185 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
151619 -
OnePlus 3
141764 -
LG G5
134541 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
132849 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
132084 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
131758 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
131666 -
ZTE Axon 7
129926 -
LeEco Le Max 2
129461 -
Nubia Z11
129099 -
Meizu Pro 6
99195 -
Huawei P9
98069 -
Huawei P9 Plus
97392 -
Huawei Honor 8
94892 -
Meizu MX6
92377 -
Huawei Mate 8
91609 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
77442 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
63358
Now, there are actually quite a few aspects at play here. Besides the CPU clock speed boost, the MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 also operates its Adreno 530 GPU at a higher frequency. More on that a little bit later. The RAM interface frequency and maximum bandwidth has also been increased from 1333 MHz or 21.3GB/s to 1866 MHz or 29.8 GB/s. However, we have no real indications that OnePlus changed the 6GB LPDDR4 chips, powering the handset. They are most-likely identical to the ones in the OnePlus 3.
Something that did definitely change, however, is the device's default file system. Now, this is a harder subject to investigate, but a few fellow tech reviewers have managed to determine that the two OnePlus 3 models use the same snappy UFS 2.0 NAND storage chips. However, whereas the vanilla OnePlus 3 still uses EXT4 as a file system, on the OnePlus 3T, F2FS is now the standard.
The latter has been making the rounds in various custom ROM communities, including the OnePlus one, going as far back as the original OnePlus One handset. It appears the real-world benefits from using the more efficient file system are tangible. Cold-starting many demanding apps is a few seconds quicker on the OnePlus 3T, over its sibling on these grounds alone.
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
3328 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
2698 -
OnePlus 3
2677 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
2677 -
Nubia Z11
2591 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2507 -
LeEco Le Max 2
2494 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
2444 -
LG G5
2425 -
Huawei P9
2190 -
Huawei P9 Plus
2155 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
2045 -
Huawei Mate 8
2033 -
Huawei Honor 8
2029 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
2004 -
ZTE Axon 7
1889 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
1648 -
Meizu Pro 6
1446 -
Meizu MX6
1203
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
2690 -
OnePlus 3T
2678 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
2434 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2378 -
OnePlus 3
2365 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
2352 -
ZTE Axon 7
2346 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
2180 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
2128 -
Huawei P9 Plus
2099 -
Huawei Honor 8
2099 -
Huawei P9
2068 -
LG G5
2065 -
LeEco Le Max 2
2063 -
Huawei Mate 8
2017 -
Meizu Pro 6
1919 -
Nubia Z11
1790 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
1696 -
Meizu MX6
469
However, that being said, it is also important to note that this should not be written off as an advantage of the refreshed model. OnePlus has promised to bring the F2FS file system to the older device as well, once Nougat hits and both devices end up on the same software and update path. This should effectively shrink the storage performance difference between the pair. In fact, if you are currently using a OnePlus 3 unit and are feeling adventurous, you can pick up the latest community build of Oxygen OS and experience the performance difference for yourself.
Moving on to graphics, it is hardly surprising to see that the Adreno 530 copes a lot better when tasked to only push pixels in 1080p resolution, as opposed to QHD. This has always been a polarizing aspect on the OnePlus line, especially in 2016. However, like we already mentioned, we stand firm behind our belief that 1080p is perfectly sharp on a 5.5-inch panel and the power-efficiency and performance benefits are undeniable.
Furthermore, the Adreno 530 inside the Snapdragon 821 is now clocked at 653 Mhz, compared to the 510 MHz, inside the older Snapdragon 820. This shines through in the benchmark runs as well.
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
49 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
49 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
49 -
LG G5
47 -
OnePlus 3
46 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
45 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
44 -
LeEco Le Max 2
44 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
39 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
38 -
Nubia Z11
31 -
Meizu Pro 6
18 -
Huawei Mate 8
18 -
Huawei P9
18 -
Huawei P9 Plus
18 -
Huawei Honor 8
18 -
Meizu MX6
17 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
15 -
ZTE Axon 7
15 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
48 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
47 -
OnePlus 3
45 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
44 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
43 -
Nubia Z11
34 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
31 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
29 -
LeEco Le Max 2
28 -
LG G5
28 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 -
Huawei P9
19 -
Huawei P9 Plus
19 -
Huawei Honor 8
19 -
Meizu Pro 6
18 -
Huawei Mate 8
18 -
Meizu MX6
17 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
15 -
ZTE Axon 7
12 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
33 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
32 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
32 -
OnePlus 3
31 -
ZTE Axon 7
31 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
30 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
30 -
LG G5
30 -
LeEco Le Max 2
28 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
26 -
Nubia Z11
22 -
Meizu Pro 6
11 -
Meizu MX6
11 -
Huawei Mate 8
10 -
Huawei P9
10 -
Huawei P9 Plus
10 -
Huawei Honor 8
10 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
9.5 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
33 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
32 -
OnePlus 3
30 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
29 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
26 -
Nubia Z11
22 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
18 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
16 -
LeEco Le Max 2
15 -
ZTE Axon 7
15 -
LG G5
15 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 -
Meizu Pro 6
11 -
Meizu MX6
11 -
Huawei Mate 8
11 -
Huawei P9
11 -
Huawei P9 Plus
11 -
Huawei Honor 8
11 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
9.5 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1
GFX 3.1 Car scene (offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
20 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
19 -
OnePlus 3
18 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
18 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
18 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
17 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
16 -
LeEco Le Max 2
16 -
Nubia Z11
16 -
LG G5
16 -
ZTE Axon 7
15 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 -
Huawei P9
6.5 -
Meizu Pro 6
6.4 -
Huawei Honor 8
6.3 -
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 -
Meizu MX6
6 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
5.4 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4
GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
20 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
19 -
OnePlus 3
18 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
17 -
Nubia Z11
17 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
16 -
ZTE Axon 7
16 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
12 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
10 -
LeEco Le Max 2
8.8 -
LG G5
8.8 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
7.9 -
Huawei P9
7.1 -
Huawei Honor 8
6.9 -
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 -
Meizu Pro 6
6.4 -
Meizu MX6
6 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
5.4 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4
Even the highly-demanding OpenGL ES 3.1 Car benchmark was rendered at a respectable 20 frames by the OnePlus 3T. That is almost playable and quite an achievement, considering not long ago, handsets barely managed single-digit scores in the benchmark.
Basemark X and Basemark ES 3.1 paint a very similar picture as well.
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
36958 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
36322 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
36240 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
36062 -
LeEco Le Max 2
33874 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
33110 -
OnePlus 3
32715 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
32345 -
ZTE Axon 7
32243 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
32160 -
LG G5
29456 -
Nubia Z11
23899 -
Huawei P9
16942 -
Huawei Honor 8
16592 -
Huawei Mate 8
15593 -
Meizu Pro 6
15209 -
Huawei P9 Plus
15058 -
Meizu MX6
12621 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
12190
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S7
732 -
Lenovo Moto Z Droid
648 -
OnePlus 3T
641 -
OnePlus 3
625 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
624 -
ZTE Axon 7
606 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
588 -
LG G5
587 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
580 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
538 -
LeEco Le Max 2
517 -
Nubia Z11
432 -
Huawei Honor 8
345 -
Huawei P9
341 -
Huawei Mate 8
311 -
Huawei P9 Plus
214
Seeing all the scores so far, one thing is clear. Few phones can come close to the OnePlus 3T price/performance ratio. The original OnePlus 3 is still an amazingly capable device that won't disappoint even the most demanding power user. However, it is undeniable that the OnePlus 3T is the most powerful device by OnePlus yet.
Reader comments
- Gattu
- 19 May 2022
- 7kg
Now u know the value of op??
- Sayeed2699
- 21 Jan 2020
- X$3
Bought one on January 2017, Now it is January 2020; Still going strong-No issues-2 day battery life.
- Annkay
- 04 Jan 2020
- GX%
My android phone oneplus 3T just got locked up and it's requesting for a password but I can't remember using a password for it. Kindly help me