Palm Treo 750
- E
- Eran
- Rdx
- 11 Mar 2007
this phone has evrything you need, it is a great phone im happey with it.
- A
- Avi
- THk
- 07 Mar 2007
very nice phone, i love it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- iRH
- 06 Mar 2007
there is a palm version. the palm version is a lot better.
- P
- Peiru
- jGp
- 05 Mar 2007
beautiful phone, and works great.
- l
- lorsban
- w0Q
- 04 Mar 2007
Another windows mobile?!! What the hell? Give us a palm version, fer pete's sake!
- ?
- Anonymous
- PP$
- 03 Mar 2007
ugly
- ?
- Anonymous
- jFf
- 03 Mar 2007
i own palm treo 600.. other than vga camera, what are the main differences?
- M
- Marc
- 4I9
- 02 Mar 2007
Anyone know if its possible to sync it with a mac?
- S
- Steve
- THk
- 27 Feb 2007
Very good phone, excellent features. Good receptions, easy to operate, short life battery the only problem.
- E
- Erez
- jGp
- 26 Feb 2007
Love everything about this phone, and I had them all, from Motorola to Nokia to Samsung and Sony, this phone is great, the only problem is the battery, I even see a great improvement with the call reception, this phone is awesome.trust me. once you learn all the great futures its a silk and cool smart phone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- MsN
- 20 Feb 2007
i remember when i bought my first handspring followed by my first palm device. that must have been 15 years before any of the competition. I think its time all you guys on top wake up and smell the real world. what happened to you guys.
- T
- Troy
- 49V
- 15 Feb 2007
Still no WiFi? When will Palm learn? For a company that was the leader with the Treo 650, they sure are lagging behind now.
- j
- j g
- nyF
- 14 Feb 2007
having had 2 one been a replacement i am very disappointed with the 750 as it turned out not to be compatible with the parrot 3100 kit as stated on the parrot and palm website.palm said they were looking into the problem and were no help at all.i will not purchase another and maybe you should have a think before you decide to spend on this product.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Rn@
- 14 Feb 2007
i'm first!.. could've done a little better... 'low end pda' categ. maybe?