Poco Pad review

GSMArena Team, 06 July 2024.

Display

The Poco Pad impresses with a large 12.1-inch IPS LCD screen with 2560 x 1600 pixels (249ppi), 120Hz refresh rate, 240Hz touch sampling, 12-bit color depth and Dolby Vision support.

A sheet of Gorilla Glass 3 is used on the screen to keep scratches away.

Poco Pad review

The official specifications list 500nits as typical and 600nis as maximum brightness. And the numbers are in the ballpark - we measured 488nits of maximum manual and 564 nits of maximum automatic brightness.

The minimum brightness at point white was 2.1 nits.

Max display brightness test

White test pattern, 75% fill (nits)

  • Manual mode
  • Auto mode
Redmi Pad Pro Redmi Pad Pro
538
12.1" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Honor Pad 9 Honor Pad 9
530
12.1" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Poco Pad Poco Pad
488
12.1" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Xiaomi Pad 5 Xiaomi Pad 5
478
11.0" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Honor Pad X9 Honor Pad X9
452
11.5" LCD 1200 x 2000 px
OnePlus Pad OnePlus Pad
442
11.61" IPS LCD 2000 x 2800 px
Xiaomi Pad 6 Xiaomi Pad 6
426
11" IPS LCD 1800 x 2880 px
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
402
11" IPS LCD 1920 x 1200 px
Realme Pad X Realme Pad X
394
11" IPS LCD 2000 x 1200 px
Redmi Pad Pro Redmi Pad Pro
654
12.1" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Poco Pad Poco Pad
564
12.1" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Honor Pad 9 Honor Pad 9
530
12.1" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Xiaomi Pad 6 Xiaomi Pad 6
500
11" IPS LCD 1800 x 2880 px
Realme Pad X Realme Pad X
496
11" IPS LCD 2000 x 1200 px
Xiaomi Pad 5 Xiaomi Pad 5
478
11.0" IPS LCD 1600 x 2560 px
Honor Pad X9 Honor Pad X9
452
11.5" LCD 1200 x 2000 px
OnePlus Pad OnePlus Pad
442
11.61" IPS LCD 2000 x 2800 px
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
402
11" IPS LCD 1920 x 1200 px

Refresh rate

The Poco Pad display supports up to 120Hz refresh rate. There are four modes for controlling the refresh rate - Default (read Auto), 60Hz, 90Hz and 120Hz. The two middle options set a ceiling for the height of the refresh rate, while the Default and 120Hz modes act exactly the same, allowing the panel to go all the way to its maximum speed, but still scale down when not needed.

The display supports 30Hz, 48Hz, 50Hz, 60Hz, 90Hz, and 120Hz steps. However, oddly, when the screen is idling, it usually uses the maximum refresh rate allowed by the system. But across various apps we saw 30Hz (video playback), 48Hz (streaming), 50Hz (streaming), 60Hz (videos and apps), 90Hz (some system apps and games), and 120Hz in benchmarks and system UI.

HDR and streaming

The Poco Pad supports Dolby Vision streaming and offers such an option in compatible apps like Netflix. There is no HDR10 support, and hence, there is no HDR10 streaming on YouTube.

Battery life

The Poco Pad is powered by a 10,000mAh battery, the same capacity as the Redmi Pad Pro's. Quite expectedly, the Poco Pad scored a similar Active Use Score in our testing - 9:15h. It did excellent when it comes to calls and video streaming, and quite alright in the web and gaming tests.

Charging speed

The Poco Pad supports 33W fast wired charging, and it ships with such a power adapter in the box.

Poco Pad review

We have completed our charging test, of course. The supplied 33W adapter recharged 14% of the battery in 15 mins, 27% in 30 mins, while a full charge took 2 hours and 8 minutes.

Charging speed

  • in 15 min
  • in 30 min
  • Time to full charge (from 0%)
OnePlus Pad OnePlus Pad
30%
9510 mAh 80W Oppo SuperVOOC charger
Xiaomi Pad 6 Xiaomi Pad 6
20%
8840 mAh 33W
OnePlus Pad Go OnePlus Pad Go
20%
8000 mAh 37W SuperVOOC
Honor Pad X9 Honor Pad X9
18%
7250 mAh 22.5W Super Charge
Redmi Pad Pro Redmi Pad Pro
15%
10000 mAh 33W Mi Fast Charging
Poco Pad Poco Pad
14%
10000 mAh 33W Mi Fast Charging
Xiaomi Pad 5 Xiaomi Pad 5
14%
8720 mAh 22.5W
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
13%
8000 mAh 18W charging
OnePlus Pad OnePlus Pad
50%
9510 mAh 80W Oppo SuperVOOC charger
Xiaomi Pad 6 Xiaomi Pad 6
38%
8840 mAh 33W
OnePlus Pad Go OnePlus Pad Go
37%
8000 mAh 37W SuperVOOC
Honor Pad 8 Honor Pad 8
35%
7250 mAh 22.5W charging
Honor Pad X9 Honor Pad X9
34%
7250 mAh 22.5W Super Charge
Realme Pad X Realme Pad X
30%
8340 mAh 33W charging
Redmi Pad Pro Redmi Pad Pro
28%
10000 mAh 33W Mi Fast Charging
Poco Pad Poco Pad
27%
10000 mAh 33W Mi Fast Charging
Xiaomi Pad 5 Xiaomi Pad 5
27%
8720 mAh 22.5W
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
24%
8000 mAh 18W charging
OnePlus Pad OnePlus Pad
1:18h
9510 mAh 80W Oppo SuperVOOC charger
OnePlus Pad Go OnePlus Pad Go
1:28h
8000 mAh 37W SuperVOOC
Xiaomi Pad 6 Xiaomi Pad 6
1:30h
8840 mAh 33W
Honor Pad 8 Honor Pad 8
1:57h
7250 mAh 22.5W charging
Redmi Pad Pro Redmi Pad Pro
2:00h
10000 mAh 33W Mi Fast Charging
Xiaomi Pad 5 Xiaomi Pad 5
2:00h
8720 mAh 22.5W
Realme Pad X Realme Pad X
2:00h
8340 mAh 33W charging
Honor Pad X9 Honor Pad X9
2:04h
7250 mAh 22.5W Super Charge
Poco Pad Poco Pad
2:08h
10000 mAh 33W Mi Fast Charging
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2:45h
8000 mAh 18W charging

Speakers - loudness and quality

The Poco Pad has four speakers with Dolby Atmos support. They are placed two by two on the short sides.

The tablet scored a Very Good mark on our loudness test. The audio is balanced and with deep sound, enough bass and good vocals.

Use the Playback controls to listen to the phone sample recordings (best use headphones). We measure the average loudness of the speakers in LUFS. A lower absolute value means a louder sound. A look at the frequency response chart will tell you how far off the ideal "0db" flat line is the reproduction of the bass, treble, and mid frequencies. You can add more phones to compare how they differ. The scores and ratings are not comparable with our older loudspeaker test. Learn more about how we test here.

Reader comments

You mean those slow cards with 20mb/s speed with high cost per GB? With USB 3.2 gen 1 and a tiny external ssd you can 30x that speed. Don't need 3.5mm because I can't use my USB-C DAC/AMP on that output, and onboard DAC is trash on b...

  • Anonymous
  • 16 Aug 2024
  • mVv

Better for you. It doesn't have audio jack and sd card slot.

Just ordered the Xiaomi Pad 6 8gb/256gb. Almost same price (290€) and is still better. 1800p + 144hz, usb 3.2/DP, UFS 3.1, LPDDR5 + more. SD 870 is older but better chipset, especially GPU (+TSMC and not Shamsung fab), and only 1% CPU throttling...