Razer Phone hands-on review
Early performance findings
Razer definitely talked the big talk when it comes to the performance of its Phone so we were very eager to check out what that is about. The company's PC business has seen no shortage of third-party support, but we are yet to see if developers will be equally keen to push titles optimized for Razer's unique high refresh rate display on Android.
The road to high frame rate gaming is a long and bumpy one and we can't realistically expect all current titles to make proper use of the Razer Phone's display. Still it makes a lot of sense to throw traditional benchmarks at the phone to see how it does in terms of raw processing power.
You can expect more benchmark numbers in our full review, but we managed to get some on the show floor. As expected CPU performance is broadly in line with the other Snapdragon 835 devices.
GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Note8
6784 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
6754 -
Razer Phone
6728 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6629 -
Huawei Mate 10
6625 -
OnePlus 5
6604 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
6593 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
6590 -
HTC U11
6393 -
LG V30
6365 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
6301 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5460
GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4232 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
1987 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
1986 -
OnePlus 5
1932 -
Razer Phone
1931 -
HTC U11
1919 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
1919 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1915 -
LG V30
1901 -
Huawei Mate 10
1882 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
1862 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1836 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
1832
The more compound AnTuTu benchmark paints a pretty typical 2017 flagship picture as well.
AnTuTu 6
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
188766 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
181570 -
OnePlus 5
180331 -
Razer Phone
179357 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
178674 -
HTC U11
177343 -
Huawei Mate 10
175426 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
175153 -
LG V30
174330 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
174070 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
172425 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
168133 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
144223
What about graphics then - it is a gaming phone after all. As it turns out there are no surprises there either and the raw performance is as good as its Snapdragon 835 peers.
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
85 -
Huawei Mate 10
65 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
63 -
Razer Phone
61 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
61 -
HTC U11
60 -
LG V30
60 -
OnePlus 5
60 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
57 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
53 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
51 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
50 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
50
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
59 -
OnePlus 5
56 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
49 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 -
Huawei Mate 10
43 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
42 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
40 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40 -
Razer Phone
39 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
37 -
HTC U11
35 -
LG V30
35 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
34
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
43 -
Razer Phone
42 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
42 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
42 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
42 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
42 -
HTC U11
41 -
LG V30
41 -
OnePlus 5
41 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
39 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
39 -
Huawei Mate 10
38
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
41 -
OnePlus 5
40 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
32 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
23 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
23 -
Huawei Mate 10
23 -
Razer Phone
22 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
22 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
20 -
HTC U11
19 -
LG V30
19 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
18
As a matter of fact 1080p devices even manage to outscore the Razer Phone - that could only be expected given that they have the same GPU and almost half as many pixels to refresh.
GFX 3.1 Car scene (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Razer Phone
25 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
25 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
25 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
25 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
25 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
25 -
HTC U11
24 -
LG V30
24 -
OnePlus 5
24 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
23 -
Huawei Mate 10
21
GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 -
OnePlus 5
24 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
24 -
Razer Phone
15 -
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
15 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
13 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
13 -
Samsung Galaxy Note8
13 -
HTC U11
13 -
LG V30
13 -
Huawei Mate 10
13 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
12
Razer made bold claims regarding its cooling solution, saying that it's superior to all its rivals, but we will note that our review unit got pretty hot during this, granted pretty long, benchmarking session.
Still it would be foolish to say that the Razer isn't any faster than its competitors. Benchmarks don't tell the whole story and we will have to complete our full review before we are to deliver a final verdict. After all the UI navigation and the games we tried were super smooth and that's certainly worth more than some numbers that you can post online to get bragging rights.
Reader comments
- Aircrackng
- 05 May 2018
- Y2B
Benchmarks seem disappointing for a smartphone touting itself on Superior gaming... Not that it did poorly but it's not going to give you anything better then other flagships and in some cases or clearly did far worse. Also using your smartphone for ...
- Anonymous
- 02 Dec 2017
- tNw
Bet they did not think about the future of these phones by glueing the batteries. Only future fools that will keep parting with their money every year or two.