Razer Phone hands-on review

GSMArena team, 01 November 2017.

Early performance findings

Razer definitely talked the big talk when it comes to the performance of its Phone so we were very eager to check out what that is about. The company's PC business has seen no shortage of third-party support, but we are yet to see if developers will be equally keen to push titles optimized for Razer's unique high refresh rate display on Android.

The road to high frame rate gaming is a long and bumpy one and we can't realistically expect all current titles to make proper use of the Razer Phone's display. Still it makes a lot of sense to throw traditional benchmarks at the phone to see how it does in terms of raw processing power.

You can expect more benchmark numbers in our full review, but we managed to get some on the show floor. As expected CPU performance is broadly in line with the other Snapdragon 835 devices.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    6784
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    6754
  • Razer Phone
    6728
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    6629
  • Huawei Mate 10
    6625
  • OnePlus 5
    6604
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    6593
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    6590
  • HTC U11
    6393
  • LG V30
    6365
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    6301
  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    5460

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 8 Plus
    4232
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    1987
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    1986
  • OnePlus 5
    1932
  • Razer Phone
    1931
  • HTC U11
    1919
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    1919
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    1915
  • LG V30
    1901
  • Huawei Mate 10
    1882
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    1862
  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    1836
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    1832

The more compound AnTuTu benchmark paints a pretty typical 2017 flagship picture as well.

AnTuTu 6

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 8 Plus
    188766
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    181570
  • OnePlus 5
    180331
  • Razer Phone
    179357
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    178674
  • HTC U11
    177343
  • Huawei Mate 10
    175426
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    175153
  • LG V30
    174330
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    174070
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    172425
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    168133
  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    144223

What about graphics then - it is a gaming phone after all. As it turns out there are no surprises there either and the raw performance is as good as its Snapdragon 835 peers.

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 8 Plus
    85
  • Huawei Mate 10
    65
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    63
  • Razer Phone
    61
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    61
  • HTC U11
    60
  • LG V30
    60
  • OnePlus 5
    60
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    57
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    53
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    51
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    50
  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    50

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 8 Plus
    59
  • OnePlus 5
    56
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    49
  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    47
  • Huawei Mate 10
    43
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    42
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    40
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    40
  • Razer Phone
    39
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    37
  • HTC U11
    35
  • LG V30
    35
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    34

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    43
  • Razer Phone
    42
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    42
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    42
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    42
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    42
  • HTC U11
    41
  • LG V30
    41
  • OnePlus 5
    41
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    39
  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    39
  • Huawei Mate 10
    38

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    41
  • OnePlus 5
    40
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    32
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    23
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    23
  • Huawei Mate 10
    23
  • Razer Phone
    22
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    22
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    20
  • HTC U11
    19
  • LG V30
    19
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    18

As a matter of fact 1080p devices even manage to outscore the Razer Phone - that could only be expected given that they have the same GPU and almost half as many pixels to refresh.

GFX 3.1 Car scene (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Razer Phone
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    25
  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    25
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    25
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    25
  • HTC U11
    24
  • LG V30
    24
  • OnePlus 5
    24
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    23
  • Huawei Mate 10
    21

GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Sony Xperia XZ Premium
    25
  • OnePlus 5
    24
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (MIUI 9 Beta)
    24
  • Razer Phone
    15
  • Motorola Moto Z2 Force
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+
    13
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    13
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    13
  • HTC U11
    13
  • LG V30
    13
  • Huawei Mate 10
    13
  • Samsung Galaxy S8+ (SD 835)
    12

Razer made bold claims regarding its cooling solution, saying that it's superior to all its rivals, but we will note that our review unit got pretty hot during this, granted pretty long, benchmarking session.

Still it would be foolish to say that the Razer isn't any faster than its competitors. Benchmarks don't tell the whole story and we will have to complete our full review before we are to deliver a final verdict. After all the UI navigation and the games we tried were super smooth and that's certainly worth more than some numbers that you can post online to get bragging rights.

Reader comments

Benchmarks seem disappointing for a smartphone touting itself on Superior gaming... Not that it did poorly but it's not going to give you anything better then other flagships and in some cases or clearly did far worse. Also using your smartphone for ...

  • Anonymous
  • 02 Dec 2017
  • tNw

Bet they did not think about the future of these phones by glueing the batteries. Only future fools that will keep parting with their money every year or two.