Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) review: Marathoner with a punch

22 March 2017
A Samsung for every taste - that seems to be the main mantra of the Korean giant as of late, as evident by its sprawling and ever-expanding smartphone lineup. We guess it's always good to have more options, but we just can't shake the feeling that some of Samsung's recent creations are beginning to overlap and thread in each other's territory – at least from the global perspective we have.

Sort by:

  • D
  • AnonD-113455
  • xAd
  • 23 Mar 2017

Will they release Galaxy A9 (2017) with 4000 mah battery? That gonna be awesome beast.

    • m
    • mir
    • t7X
    • 23 Mar 2017

    Their A series have bigger batteries than their flagship S series. Guess they don't know what the meaning of a flagship is. It is supposed to showcase the best that the company can offer.

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • K7P
      • 23 Mar 2017

      A small bezel A7 with OIS will be nice.

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • 0U@
        • 23 Mar 2017

        quote:"Samsung is still keeping the A7 (2017) away from European markets for some reason and until that changes, gray imports are your only bet on the Old Continent."

        And that reason is that carriers are full of unsold A(2016) stock.So basically no one care bout newer ones,even less at this price points.

          • J
          • JackTheIPhoneKiller
          • KIA
          • 22 Mar 2017

          Jumped straight to page 3 to check its battery score. Will read the rest of the review tomorrow. :-D

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • K7P
            • 22 Mar 2017

            If we browse the internet, can we really get a 15:28 screen on time as your test result on this phone? Just curious to ask if a phone could really get a 15 hour of screen on time now?

              Samsung is the king of battery optimization!

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • swf
                • 22 Mar 2017

                Seriously what's up with Samsung. Their low end or mid range phones are better than their flagship.

                I mean this one has better endurance rating than S8 (surely , S8 would use just 3000 mah).
                C9 Pro better day to day performance (due to ram caching)
                All have a better aspect ratio...

                Is Samsung dropping the ball with S8 or what?

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • 7Ac
                  • 22 Mar 2017

                  That endurance rating should be on all flagships!

                    4 of 4