Infinix Note 40 Pro+ review
- z
- zodiacfml
- t7W
- 15 Jun 2024
I thought a few weeks ago that Tecno and Infinix are good value phones, I must have been looking at old models with good prices (this is how LG failed, new phones cost a lot only to heavily discounted several months after). Turns out Poco retains value crown and Redmi is the best for chipset/performance for price.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 6XI
- 15 Jun 2024
best design
- A
- AlexS
- Ggr
- 14 Jun 2024
How Samsung A55 is under $300?
- A
- Aydell
- r3b
- 14 Jun 2024
Looks promising
- ?
- Anonymous
- fuf
- 14 Jun 2024
I'm also using the same phone .it's so nice
- justasmile
- vjq
- 14 Jun 2024
Claudesp33d, 14 Jun 2024It's a downgrade from last year note 30 vipIt's not supposed to succeed 30 VIP. Otherwise, why named Pro+ instead of VIP?
- U
- UnknownuserGSMArena
- 8wk
- 14 Jun 2024
So it only has a nice design and wireless charging while everything else is horrible. Do NOT buy.
- y
- yangsj
- gsV
- 14 Jun 2024
I find it criminal how budget phones give a full retail box while flagships don't even give a charger
- S
- Sarkirssian
- LiJ
- 14 Jun 2024
Why so much RAM... Let the developers do better software.
- M
- MHDR
- Tjx
- 14 Jun 2024
Infenix getting top. High specs phones with good price-quality. And most impressive Zero series
- r
- rizki1
- 6cn
- 14 Jun 2024
Infinix needs to improve speakers, PWM, HDR, no auto mode etc which is only 600 nits like the GSMArena test that's less for AMOLED.