Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 review: Walking tall
- s
- simonh
- iL}
- 17 Jun 2013
if this is mid range then the iphone must be in the budget phone section its got features the iphone wouldnt have in a million years....
- D
- Dee™
- v}7
- 17 Jun 2013
If you like the phone wait a bit because (as always) Samsung phone will dropping gradually....unlike iPhones!
- P
- Portugal
- 0ZB
- 17 Jun 2013
Just saw it in a store, in portugal the galaxy mega 6.3 LTE costs now 549,99euros, but it's innicial price was 699,99euros. Expensive for what it offers, which is no innovation besides the large screen
- ?
- Anonymous
- v0X
- 16 Jun 2013
This phone will be laggy and sloe in a couple of months, apps and os as updates are getting specs hungry
- D
- AnonD-109100
- v{W
- 16 Jun 2013
This thing could have proved a good sucess story for samsung..
But the pricing sucks big time..
Its available for 30000rs here in India, while the S3 costs around 27000rs.. Its way too costly for its specs.. Well, and couple of thousand more and we get super fast note 2..
Samsung has now started taking its sucess for granted, like what Nokia did and see what happened..
- r
- reym
- v0q
- 16 Jun 2013
Why only Adreno 305, Sony is using Adreno 320 for this res, and using 305 for FWVGA resolution on lower midrange. This Mega is not the best for gaming then.
RAM could have been bigger also, Samsungs bloat is RAM hungry. Design and choice of materials is disastrous, as usual from Samsung.
Other than that things are looking good, so big and yet so slim, and with narrow bezel, beats the Note 2, looking forward to try and hold this super slim giant that will still feel fat compared to Sony Togari.
- r
- reym
- v0q
- 16 Jun 2013
Why only Adreno 305, Sony is using Adreno 320 for this res, and using 305 for FWVGA resolution on lower midrange. This Mega is not the best for gaming then.
RAM could have been bigger also, Samsungs bloat is RAM hungry. Design and choice of materials is disastrous, as usual from Samsung.
Other than that things are looking good, so big and yet so slim, and with narrow bezel, beats the Note 2, looking forward to try and hold this super slim giant that will still feel fat compared to Sony Togari.
- s
- satyam
- rAf
- 16 Jun 2013
the price in india is too high for the specs may be adreno 320 would have been better and screen reduced to 6 inch.
- D
- AnonD-100039
- QL{
- 16 Jun 2013
When I saw your hands-on video a while ago, I hated this phone instantly because it is LAGGY! ... BIG TIME laggy and it barely had any apps... wait till you see it full of apps we use daily ... in more accurate words ... Samsung Galaxy Mega Lag 6.3
Why can't the next nexus or Motorola xPhone come out already!?
- A
- AK
- PSc
- 16 Jun 2013
AnonD-26941, 16 Jun 2013FIRST and I've gotta say awesome phone :D big screen... moreNot cheap lol. It costs more than note 2.
- A
- Achtung
- Sb6
- 16 Jun 2013
I think that using the new processor core 300. See the results in one thread
- D
- AnonD-105795
- jes
- 16 Jun 2013
Waiting for S4 mini review. It has the samne chipset but at much lower resolution 540x960 so that mean it will be faster and more powerful. If I buy S4 mini then I will buy Nexus 7 2nd along with it or just buy Mega 6.3 for everything and still fit it in pocket. It very useful on some occasions but not all the time. For me plastic is not a big deal, just buy a high quality case and its all set.
- D
- AnonD-26941
- fmp
- 16 Jun 2013
FIRST
and I've gotta say
awesome phone :D
big screen, low price, cool specs
the only down side is that it's a Samsung phone
cheap plastic toy-like materials !!