Samsung Galaxy A02s/M02s review

Competition

The Galaxy A02s hovers around the €150 mark for the base 3GB/32GB version in continental Europe, or some £140 in the UK, while its M02s alter ego can be had for as little as INR9,000 in India. That's clearly at the lower end of the price spectrum, but what else is there for the money?

For one, the Galaxy A12. In most of Europe, that retails for some €10 above A02s money in 4GB/64GB trim, and, for all its flaws, it's the better phone. You'd be getting an ultra-wide cam, better low-light performance from the main cam, and a marginally quicker chipset. It's not quite so in the UK or India, for example, where the A12 is appreciably more expensive than its lesser stablemate (£170/INR13,000), and the A02s/M02s does make a case for itself by offering savings.

The Redmi 9 is among the go-to options in the segment, and it's either selling for A02s money or it's cheaper (or, you know, not officially available). You get more, too - an ultra-wide camera, a better close-up shooter, much more powerful chipset, and a 1080p display. Sounds like a better deal altogether, but a Redmi is no Galaxy.

Neither is a Realme, but the company does have a few compelling offers in the price range. The Narzo 20A is one of the most affordable Realmes in India, at A02s' price, and it beats the Galaxy with a beefier chipset and 4K video recording capability. Meanwhile, in Europe, you can get your hands on a Realme 7i for a small premium over a Galaxy A02s. That is also a thoroughly more capable package with a superior camera system and chipset.

A Moto G9 Play is a viable alternative to the Galaxy A02s too. The Moto's chipset is, once again, more powerful than the Galaxy's, and the camera experience is better on the G9 Play. Mind you, the Moto G9 Play goes by Moto G9 in India, and it's tangibly more expensive than the competing Galaxy M02s there.

Samsung Galaxy A12 • Xiaomi Redmi 9 • Realme Narzo 20A • Realme 7i (Global) • Motorola Moto G9 Play

Verdict

The Galaxy A02s is one of the least expensive Samsung phones you can buy, and as such, it offers good value to those looking for a budget entry into the brand. It's not a bad choice for a less demanding user either, and those will appreciate the long battery life, decent picture quality and overall look and feel.

A more discerning buyer will likely be put off mostly by the dated, low-performance chipset and lack of a fingerprint reader. The relatively low brightness display and missing camera features don't help either.

Ultimately, if you're on a tight budget and looking to get the most out of it, perhaps brand loyalty shouldn't be on top of your priorities list, and you should look at competing offers from classic value-oriented makers. If you insist on a Galaxy, certain concessions are inevitable.

Pros

• Very good screen contrast ratio due to deep blacks.
• Nice build, appealing looks.
• Excellent battery life.

Cons

• No fingerprint sensor.
• Underpowered chipset.
• No night mode, no video stabilization.
• Charging is not fast.