Samsung Galaxy A14 5G review
Android 13 and One UI 5.0 Core
The Galaxy A14 5G we have for review runs Android 13 with One UI Core 5.0 on top - so it's on the latest OS version and on the 'basic' branch of Samsung's in-house customized overlay, also in a current version. You'd be getting the same looks as higher-end Galaxy models, minus some of the more niche features.
The list of things that didn't make the cut includes Samsung Pay service (GPay is available), Easy Mode, the Bixby assistant, Secure Folder, Windows Link service, and the Good Lock app for advanced customizations.
The Android experience with One UI 5.0 Core is rather straightforward and familiar, though. The app drawer, notification shade, recent apps, lock screen and home screen, are all business as usual, as is the general Settings menu.
The accent color palette is automatically generated based on your wallpaper, but this time around, the system gives you a wider choice of color combinations and that palette can also be applied to app icons.
There's no Always-on display on the Galaxy A14 5G.
Widgets can now be stacked, and you can switch between stacked widgets with a simple swipe. Keep in mind that not all widgets support stacking, so app developers might have to get around that pretty soon.
Modes and routines, a feature similar to Apple's Focus, is present on the Galaxy A14 5G's Core build too. You can choose a mode based on what you are doing right now and execute certain actions, change sound profiles, display settings, notifications, etc. For instance, the driving Routines profile can be set up to turn on DnD mode and launch Spotify automatically, for example. You can even trigger certain Routines with actions of your choice, such as turning on the hotspot or airplane mode.
The side-mounted fingerprint reader will likely be the primary method of unlocking for most, but you can still use face unlock either instead of or alongside it. It can be more convenient in certain situations, but it generally is less secure since it's just using the selfie camera. The phone can be set to require a press on the button instead of the default touch-to-unlock operation. A swipe-down gesture can be enabled for pulling the notification shade from the fingerprint reader.
Security options • Biometrics • Fingerprint settings • Fingerprint enrollment • Swipe down gesture
Familiar proprietary Samsung features present in One UI 5.0, even in this Core variant, include the Edge panels - the panes that show up when you swipe in from the side and provide tools and shortcuts to apps and contacts. Game launcher, the hub for all your games, which also provides options for limiting distraction when gaming is here to stay as well.
Otherwise, the software package is similar to other Samsung phones, with an in-house Gallery app and a proprietary file manager, as well as Samsung's Internet web browser. Split-screen multi-tasking is also an option.
Edge panel • Game Launcher • Gallery • File manager • Split-screen
Performance and benchmarks
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G we have here runs on the Dimensity 700, a low-end 5G-capable platform that dates a while back. The Galaxy A22 5G used it, and that's a two-year-old handset, plus it was also on the Galaxy A13 5G from last year. So there's no change in the core of the A14 5G.
That said, just like last year there were multiple A13s, this year there's another version of the Galaxy A14 5G - it's packing the Exynos 1330, Samsung's own 5G chipset for more affordable devices. That one has a slightly beefier CPU - the two powerful cores are the newer Cortex-A78 ones and are clocked higher at 2.4GHz (2x Cortex-A76 at 2.2GHz in the Dimensity). There's also the matter of the GPU, which is a Mali-G68 MC4 on the Exynos and Mali-G57 MC2 on the Dimensity, and that reads like a thorough improvement. Overall, you can expect higher performance out of the Exynos-equipped Galaxy A14 5G.
Unfortunately, we haven't tested an Exynos 1330 handset to include here for comparison, so we'll do the next best thing. We'll throw in a Galaxy M53 - its Dimensity 900 has the same CPU and GPU configuration as the Exynos 1330 so numbers should be fairly similar.
The Exynos version is the one sold in India, while the US gets the Dimensity. For other regions, you'd best check with your retailer, carrier, or local Samsung website. While Samsung doesn't normally list specific chipsets, they do usually quote the clock rates, and the 2.4GHz vs. 2.2GHz difference should be a dead giveaway.
With that preamble behind us, let's look at some benchmark numbers from the US-bound Dimensity 700-equipped Galaxy A14 5G.
GeekBench 5 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
730 -
Realme 10 Pro
698 -
Galaxy A23 5G
676 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
676 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
597 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
597 -
Realme 10
567 -
Galaxy A22 5G
560 -
Moto G62
543 -
Galaxy A14
530 -
Redmi Note 11 Pro
511 -
Redmi Note 11
376 -
Galaxy A13
153
GeekBench 5 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
2037 -
Realme 10 Pro
2021 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
1945 -
Galaxy A23 5G
1940 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
1797 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
1797 -
Realme 10
1762 -
Redmi Note 11 Pro
1729 -
Galaxy A14
1727 -
Galaxy A22 5G
1719 -
Moto G62
1697 -
Redmi Note 11
1662 -
Galaxy A13
588
AnTuTu 9
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
436197 -
Realme 10 Pro
401860 -
Realme 10
385829 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
380672 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
353663 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
353663 -
Redmi Note 11 Pro
319093 -
Galaxy A23 5G
318821 -
Galaxy A14
307886 -
Moto G62
303072 -
Redmi Note 11
244526 -
Galaxy A22 5G
223188 -
Galaxy A13
136286
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
16 -
Galaxy A23 5G
12 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
12 -
Realme 10 Pro
11 -
Realme 10
10 -
Moto G62
9.7 -
Galaxy A22 5G
8.4 -
Galaxy A14
8.3 -
Redmi Note 11
4.6 -
Galaxy A13
3.3
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
10 -
Realme 10 Pro
7.8 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
7.8 -
Galaxy A23 5G
7.6 -
Realme 10
6.5 -
Moto G62
6.5 -
Galaxy A14
5.5 -
Galaxy A22 5G
5.5 -
Redmi Note 11
3.1 -
Galaxy A13
2.2
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
15 -
Galaxy A23 5G
12 -
Realme 10 Pro
12 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
12 -
Moto G62
10 -
Realme 10
9.3 -
Galaxy A14
7.9 -
Galaxy A22 5G
7.8 -
Redmi Note 11
4.8 -
Galaxy A13
3.4
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
9.8 -
Realme 10 Pro
8.3 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
8.2 -
Galaxy A23 5G
8 -
Moto G62
6.7 -
Realme 10
6.1 -
Galaxy A14
5.3 -
Galaxy A22 5G
5.1 -
Redmi Note 11
3.1 -
Galaxy A13
2.3
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
21 -
Realme 10
17 -
Galaxy A23 5G
16 -
Realme 10 Pro
16 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
16 -
Moto G62
14 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
13 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
13 -
Galaxy A14
12 -
Galaxy A22 5G
12 -
Redmi Note 11 Pro
12 -
Redmi Note 11
6.8 -
Galaxy A13
5.2
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
26 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
20 -
Galaxy A23 5G
19 -
Realme 10 Pro
19 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
16 -
Moto G62
16 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
16 -
Galaxy A14
15 -
Galaxy A22 5G
14 -
Realme 10
14 -
Redmi Note 11 Pro
14 -
Redmi Note 11
8 -
Galaxy A13
6.2
GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
38 -
Galaxy A23 5G
29 -
Realme 10 Pro
29 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
29 -
Realme 10
28 -
Moto G62
26 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
23 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
23 -
Redmi Note 11 Pro
22 -
Galaxy A14
21 -
Galaxy A22 5G
21 -
Redmi Note 11
12 -
Galaxy A13
8.3
GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
-
Galaxy M53
42 -
Realme 10 Pro
35 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
35 -
Galaxy A23 5G
33 -
Moto G62
28 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
26 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
26 -
Galaxy A14
25 -
Realme 10
25 -
Galaxy A22 5G
24 -
Redmi Note 11 Pro
24 -
Redmi Note 11
15 -
Galaxy A13
9.4
3DMark SSE ES 3.1 (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Realme 10 Pro
2940 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
2917 -
Moto G62
2457 -
Galaxy A14
2452 -
Galaxy A22 5G
2391 -
Redmi Note 11
1316 -
Galaxy A13
886
3DMark SSE Vulkan 1.0 (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Realme 10 Pro
2775 -
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
2744 -
Galaxy A14
2416 -
Moto G62
2287 -
Galaxy A22 5G
2257 -
Redmi Note 11
1267 -
Galaxy A13
931
You'll note from the above numbers that the Galaxy's implementation of the Dimensity 700 is on par with other handsets with the same chipset and delivers about average performance for the class. That applies to the US version, however, while the one for India should deliver scores in line with the Galaxy M53's above and that one is more of front-runner. So, the Indian version is looking a lot more appealing from a performance standpoint.
What's good about chipsets of the Dimensity 700 caliber is that they can maintain their initial level of performance under prolonged load. That's what we observed on the Galaxy A14 too, for the most part - other than a small dip in CPU results almost an hour into the test. The GPU stress test scores were solid, though.
Reader comments
- Zmantt
- 04 Nov 2024
- K3q
The phone was decent at the beginning but around 8 months in its very laggy even on the home screen with no apps in the background even simply opening an app is laggy like audiomack well take a try at using audiomack and whatsapp at the Sametime your...
- dextr
- 21 Sep 2024
- IKw
There is a lot of complaining on this phone. But honestly you get what you pay for. I paid 50 for mine, and I'm not complaining. It works good for music, phone calls and texts. As far as games or video conferencing it is a bit lacking. I have no...
- Unkonwn1
- 26 Aug 2024
- th7
Weird thing, the Dimensity 700 version of The A14 5G in pro mode has full features, you can change the shutter speed up to 30 seconds, even more than my A34 Pro mode that only has 10 seconds shutter speed