Samsung Galaxy A32 review

Competition

The Galaxy A32 in 4G spec is in a weird spot in the lineup. It obviously has no support for 5G connectivity but it has the 90Hz Super AMOLED and the 64MP camera as the key selling points, with the great battery life coming as a bonus. What else can you get at its price point of €280/£250/INR22000?

Turns out - a lot. Take, for example, the Xiaomi Redmi Note10 Pro (known as the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max in India). It one ups the Galaxy's display by offering a 120Hz refresh rate and does so with a minimal hit to battery endurance, not to mention it charges much faster. Much faster is the Redmi's chipset too, its camera is better (complete with 4K capture), and it has stereo speakers (loud ones too). The Indian version is cheaper than the Galaxy, but even if it were at a slight premium, we reckon it'll still be well worth it. Price and availability for the global model are still murky, but we can't imagine it going for over €300.

Moving on, the just-announced Realme 8 Pro starts at €280/£280/INR18000, and it's arguably a more compelling package than the Galaxy. You'd get a beefier chipset and nicer camera (4K recording, too), plus quicker charging. Here, the Galaxy wins for display, however, with its 90Hz OLED being superior than the Realme's conventional 60Hz one. Additionally, we can speculate with relative confidence that the Realme will be no match for the A32's battery life.

Another brand new release, the Poco X3 Pro, is also an alluring alternative. At €250 for a 6GB/128GB configuration, it's cheaper than the Galaxy, and comes with a flagship-grade Snapdragon 860 chipset that will run circles around the A32's lower-end Mediatek. A stereo speaker setup and a modest but appreciated IP53 rating are both in its favor too, while the 120Hz LCD vs. 90Hz OLED is an entirely personal preference. Hardly a photographer's dream, the Poco is about tied with the Galaxy for taking pictures (but does record 4K video).

If you're in India, you could also look at the very popular Vivo V20 for about the A32's asking price. The Galaxy has the better display (90Hz vs. 60Hz, brighter) and longer battery life, while the Vivo wins for charging speed and camera performance (image quality, 4K recording, AF on the ultrawide).

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro • Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max • Realme 8 Pro • Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro • vivo V20

Verdict

Despite the undeniably superb results in some areas, the Galaxy A32 has flaws that can be considered dealbreakers. The chipset is perhaps the worst offender, being too slow for the money. Likely related, the buggy Night mode can be really disappointing, and the phone underdelivers on the video recording front.

So what you're left then is great endurance, an awesome display, and the Samsung badge. Can these make a strong enough case for the Galaxy A32? Typically, they could, but at the price that Samsung charges for this one, you can get so much more phone by giving up on the Galaxy name that we feel it's not worth fixating on brand loyalty in this particular case.

Pros

• Wonderful 90Hz Super AMOLED display.
• Excellent battery life.
• Latest Android and OneUI, bright software future.

Cons

• Underpowered chipset.
• Slow fingerprint reader experience.
• Buggy Night mode on the main camera.
• No 4K video recording, poor stabilization on the ultrawide camera.