Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • d
  • drey
  • t7x
  • 03 Jan 2012

wth. screen resolution is still the same and yet screen size increased. low pixel density. this should be a decent upgrade if screen resolution was also increased.

    • j
    • joychan
    • U@U
    • 03 Jan 2012

    It's looking great, i like it but what's about price?

      • S
      • Smong
      • fvd
      • 03 Jan 2012

      so dissappointing !!! No real improvement :( and i don't think it will get ICS upgrade

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • 7j{
        • 03 Jan 2012

        good look&size useful for midrange users

          • I
          • Imtiaz Ali
          • vGF
          • 03 Jan 2012

          Well...!!

          I Hav Mixed Feelings about this...

          I Will never Understand y they have to Use such a LOW Battery...

          They better Keep the Price to very low or Increace 2 things 1) Battery Performance and 2) ICS on Launch...

          Rest is ok I feel....

          All Specs are not Updated I guess...

            AnonD-1846, 03 Jan 2012My Galaxy S is better than this rubbishHey, this is a mid-range smart phone, not a high-end one!!

              Samsung, you're a great company!! You already announced a smart phone! :> It's only problem is that it lacks a Gorilla Glass screen.

                • D
                • AnonD-1846
                • fjg
                • 03 Jan 2012

                My Galaxy S is better than this rubbish

                  • D
                  • DaniBoiGwapo
                  • wYA
                  • 03 Jan 2012

                  and...no gorilla glass..T_T

                    • D
                    • DaniBoiGwapo
                    • wYA
                    • 03 Jan 2012

                    looks good,but still,no flash support...T_T

                      • K
                      • Kati
                      • Xu9
                      • 03 Jan 2012

                      Are there more details on cpu & gpu?? ARMv7??
                      Qualcomm??? Hummingbird???

                        • D
                        • AnonD-36614
                        • tA$
                        • 03 Jan 2012

                        Well equipped to fill the gap between it's broter and uncle Galaxy W. But two problems :

                        - higher spec with smaller battery means worse endurance than the not so good endurance from old galaxy ace

                        - less sharp display

                          • s
                          • skh
                          • iwp
                          • 03 Jan 2012

                          why they changed the design. The old galaxy ace looks perfect like a iphone. This one got the camera in middle. May b samsung hav to change only the performence of the phone.not the fancy look. Making phones bigger gives no more user friendly for people. Bt the Performence is good... The gingerbread 2.3 is not the ideal for this. Must come with the 4.0 ice cream sandwich... And why they dont put a secondary camera.. They must reduce the size of the phone to the old size and must upgrade the performence and camera. Frm tht the price range should also ll get not more than we expect. Galaxy ace rocks

                            • K
                            • Khan
                            • vLy
                            • 03 Jan 2012

                            Really look odd.I am using Ace which is far better than this . No difference except CPU an Internal memory . Don't go for it .

                              • V
                              • Vivek S
                              • v$B
                              • 03 Jan 2012

                              missed secondary camera big draw backs

                                • D
                                • AnonD-15330
                                • LaB
                                • 03 Jan 2012

                                Now that pixel density sucks.