Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro preview: A closer look
A closer look
Performance
With the drop in hardware specifications, one would assume that the C7 Pro has taken a hit in performance. However, outside of a couple of games, we really didn't see any difference in performance between this phone and the C9 Pro.
What this means is that the C7 Pro is still a perfectly good device that will get you through your everyday tasks with ease. The UI is mostly fluid and the apps open quickly. The 4GB RAM is plenty, but Samsung still uses fairly aggressive memory management to close apps in the background. This happens even if you aren't running close to the limit of system memory, causing some apps to close if you don't open them for a while.
One of the advantages of the processor downgrades is that the C7 Pro does not get as hot as the C9 Pro, staying cool during normal usage. It will still get incredibly hot while charging, though.
The C7 Pro has the same stereo speaker arrangement as the C9 Pro. The bottom-firing main loudspeaker is assisted by the earpiece, which provides the high-end. This has the same basic shortcomings as the speakers on the C9 Pro. The sound at times is unbalanced due to the different nature of the two speakers, with the bottom one being more dominant. It's not always noticeable, and definitely beats having just one speaker, but as far as having stereo speakers is concerned this isn't the best implementation. Additionally, the speakers don't even flip channels when you rotate the phone, so if you hold the phone the other way then you will have sound coming out in reverse.
We were impressed by the fingerprint sensor on the C7 Pro. While we had issues on the C9 Pro, the C7 Pro sensor was consistently reliable and quick, making it one of the better systems we have tested. It's likely that Samsung tweaked the software to improve accuracy. Unfortunately, you are still limited to just three prints.
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
2678 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
2434 -
Oppo F3 Plus
1890 -
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
1770 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
1417 -
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
1228 -
vivo V5 Plus
1107 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
1050 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
1031 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
497
AnTuTu 6
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
165097 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
155185 -
Oppo F3 Plus
91458 -
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
85181 -
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
67540 -
vivo V5 Plus
63812 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
63358 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
62217 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
61616 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
61020 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
60767
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
49 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
44 -
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
17 -
Oppo F3 Plus
17 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
15 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
14 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 -
vivo V5 Plus
9.9 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
9.9 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
9.8 -
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
9.8
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
48 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
47 -
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
17 -
Oppo F3 Plus
17 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
15 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
15 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
10 -
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
9.8 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 -
vivo V5 Plus
9.7 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
9.7
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
33 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
30 -
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
11 -
Oppo F3 Plus
10 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
9.1 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
9.1 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
6.2 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 -
vivo V5 Plus
6.2 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
6.2 -
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
6.1
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
33 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
32 -
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
11 -
Oppo F3 Plus
11 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
9 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
9 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
6.7 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
6.2 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 -
vivo V5 Plus
6.1 -
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
6.1
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 3T
641 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
538 -
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
261 -
Oppo F3 Plus
261 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
259 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
229 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
138 -
vivo V5 Plus
138 -
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro
137
Reader comments
- Madhawa
- 06 Dec 2020
- f}I
Worst camera ever
- Anonymous
- 11 Nov 2020
- 5@n
I need
- Anonymous
- 16 Aug 2019
- PUM
Good but not upgrable to Android 9 pie