Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 LTE
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 LTE

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • D
  • AnonD-236232
  • IWb
  • 22 May 2014

Are this wrong information ??
Why orthers place is (Quad-Core 2.3)??

    • D
    • AnonD-236232
    • IWb
    • 22 May 2014

    Are this wrong information ??
    Why orthers place is (Quad-Core 2.3)??

      • D
      • AnonD-182470
      • MMZ
      • 21 May 2014

      Yes because the tab series is not ment to be powerfull. jeez

        • M
        • Michael
        • Nw8
        • 12 May 2014

        Do the Tab 4 come with a flash attached to the camera?

          • D
          • AnonD-90661
          • 2@k
          • 12 May 2014

          ipad ... iS more powerfull powerful

            • k
            • kaushal
            • utx
            • 08 May 2014

            according to specs not better than tab pro

              • D
              • AnonD-260503
              • w0Q
              • 04 May 2014

              You people can always upgrade to TabPro series if money is not a question.

                • D
                • AnonD-260165
                • KiX
                • 03 May 2014

                boring boring boring..
                there's no significant upgrade

                  • E
                  • Emmy
                  • N9@
                  • 20 Apr 2014

                  I would say there's no use producing a tab 4 when there's no significant upgrade, and what makes it obviously special.Samsung you people should add exciting features that makes users want to upgrade.

                    • D
                    • AnonD-43818
                    • tuf
                    • 05 Apr 2014

                    I think it's good that Samsung keeping the Tab series as a mid-range tablets, i mean if you want high-end tablets there's Tab Pro series... But i agree Quad Core 1.2 GHz chipset is way to old and slow, atleast Samsung should put Quad core 1.5 GHz or Octa core Quad core 1.2 GHz + Quad core 1.2 GHz... This better be cheap Samsung!

                      • b
                      • bluedude
                      • Nvm
                      • 04 Apr 2014

                      The Tab 4, seems rather crappy. I mean, 1.5GB Ram operating on Android 4 (I have the S4 with 2GB Ram and I constantly using 1.7GB Ram), and a 3.15MP camera, please, this isn't 2008. Quad-Core 1.2GHz CPU o_O. Really crappy CPU for a big ass device, that is expected to process way more than a phone, and the GPU? Unspecified, so it can't be so great either, and no s-voice,s-health, no s-NOTHING? X_x. Only 16GB ROM? Pffft, unless this tablet goes for REALLY cheap, it is not worth it!!!!!!!

                        • D
                        • AnonD-250375
                        • XrI
                        • 03 Apr 2014

                        The specs are not that great, 1.2ghz quad core is quite slow for todays standards and the crappy 3.15mp camera is still around...

                          • g
                          • gagan
                          • t}M
                          • 02 Apr 2014

                          AnonD-14560, 01 Apr 2014When will Samsung get rid of its physical button of the bot... moreI think physical button is good to have on devices

                            • D
                            • AnonD-14560
                            • GT7
                            • 01 Apr 2014

                            When will Samsung get rid of its physical button of the bottom of the scene? It doesn't relate to how the user hold the device at all with this size of tablet.

                              Small bezels, a quad core processor, 320g weight (probs the lightest 10 incher)... And hopefully an attractive price! Great!

                                • D
                                • AnonD-249649
                                • vX5
                                • 31 Mar 2014

                                How many galaxy series are...

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • KIe
                                  • 31 Mar 2014

                                  Yes it must be cheaper...I think not more than $350

                                    • r
                                    • raat
                                    • Trm
                                    • 31 Mar 2014

                                    product is ok but consider the price.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • 3c1
                                      • 31 Mar 2014

                                      The screen resolution should be at least 1920x1200

                                        • 0
                                        • 020114T03
                                        • K@2
                                        • 31 Mar 2014

                                        The price shouldn't be higher than US$270. Otherwise, fail.