Samsung Galaxy Y Plus S5303
- A
- Abc
- uZa
- 18 Mar 2013
It's should be "samsung galaxy y minus"
- A
- Andriod
- uZa
- 18 Mar 2013
Hahaha 2.8 "...!!! And i tought my xperia u is small, samsung should be ashamed of such phones.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 9CB
- 18 Mar 2013
malay, 16 Mar 2013why y? againafter Y Z
- a
- ayon
- uvh
- 17 Mar 2013
Whats the introductory price of this phone?Plz let me know
- D
- AnonD-125226
- KI6
- 16 Mar 2013
me, 15 Mar 2013its galaxy pocket duos plus... I agree with you but seems like this is cheaper and lighter than Galaxy Pocket Duos S5302 and carry Android OS, v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
- D
- AnonD-125226
- KI6
- 16 Mar 2013
baneh, 16 Mar 2013This should be called GALAXY Pocket plus.not Y PLUS!I agree with you but seems like this is cheaper and lighter than Galaxy Pocket Duos S5302 and carry Android OS, v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
- b
- baneh
- B}d
- 16 Mar 2013
This should be called GALAXY Pocket plus.not Y PLUS!
- m
- malay
- 7wC
- 16 Mar 2013
why y? again
- Y
- Y plus
- uv8
- 16 Mar 2013
Too waste. Just 2.8 inch screen.with ics,512mb ram and price 8000.why rex 90 with 3.5inch screen.newt time sam will launch a 2.4inch jellybean device i think with 10000 price
- m
- me
- uZa
- 15 Mar 2013
its galaxy pocket duos plus...
- m
- murtaza121
- 6P{
- 15 Mar 2013
Another bloody Galaxy Y. The first one was bad enough to begin with (not bashing samsung, just two specific phones, I love Samsung).
I doubt this'll even be able to run ICS with that pathetic 850MHz CPU. Screen is even worse than the original Galaxy Y (S5360). Samsung should make Sony type phones. Budget friendly ones with 1GHz CPU's. Below 1GHz just doesn't cut it anymore for these phones that cost almost $200. Xperia U costs $175 and it's a 1GHz Dual-Core with 512MB RAM.
This is just sad.
- D
- AnonD-93470
- JFA
- 14 Mar 2013
i guess the device is pocket plus
- D
- AnonD-117307
- t5{
- 14 Mar 2013
These days Samsung find all means to PULL the hard earned money of people by launching poor and no value for their hard earned money products.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Xje
- 14 Mar 2013
not so interesting
- D
- AnonD-104567
- pF4
- 14 Mar 2013
another galaxy Y...Y??????