Samsung J800 Luxe
- G
- Gigione
- pXm
- 01 Jul 2008
Regarding this phone: why "Luxe""?
- r
- ram
- mnE
- 30 Jun 2008
whre samsung 2mp tv out like d600
- r
- ram
- mnE
- 29 Jun 2008
samsung like j700 ok like j700 beautiful
- M
- Mobile Guru
- mpb
- 26 Jun 2008
Looks a little like a cross between a G600 & G800 in black... what u lot think...
- ?
- Anonymous
- iGf
- 26 Jun 2008
Anonymous, 25 Jun 200818 MB shared memory, 2mp NO AF, a 2.2 inches with 176 x 220... moreBut I will !
- ?
- Anonymous
- iGf
- 26 Jun 2008
discovery, 26 Jun 2008hahaha... 176x220 for this screen? disasterThere is so many other Samsung phones with 320*240 , even 240 x 440. They are all highpriced. What`s wrong with you people. There is entry class and midle class of phones to, you now, with prices from 50e-150e. !
- d
- discovery
- ph$
- 26 Jun 2008
hahaha... 176x220 for this screen? disaster
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2At
- 26 Jun 2008
* Good looks
* A 2.2", 176x220 screen seems a bit odd to me but Samsung followed the same principle when it started producing 2", 128x160 screens.
* I don't think that the Luxe moniker fits this phone. The L870 is a more deserving unit, but then how will this phone sell if it ain't got something that gives a bit of excitement. Yeah, 'J800 Luxe' would probably help sell more of it than by just being 'J800'.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4Hf
- 25 Jun 2008
it's okay.
- ?
- Anonymous
- P43
- 25 Jun 2008
18 MB shared memory, 2mp NO AF, a 2.2 inches with 176 x 220 pixels? its like my 2 years old nokia with 3G. never would buy it
- J
- Jake!
- Pxx
- 25 Jun 2008
nice specs! cool phone for samsung! 3rd to comment!
- j
- jonathan
- iBt
- 25 Jun 2008
whats about the name?!!
LUXE??!!
this is a joke??!!
samsung is goin to the back place in the list of manufacturers, and the worst thing, with this is positioned under SE, and thats is horrible.-
- r
- riltz
- Lx1
- 25 Jun 2008
1st!! :D :D :D
kind bad the screen resolution for the size (like a a moto v3 -.-"), but its middle range so non-exigent people actually dont care :P