Samsung S5550 Shark 2
MORE PICTURES

Samsung S5550 Shark 2

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • C
  • CAPI
  • Mfy
  • 05 Jan 2010

looks like samsung m620

    • D
    • DanTheMan
    • 45W
    • 05 Jan 2010

    this phone's design is very sweet and reminds me alot of the d900 i had... this phone need a bit bigger screen (no black edges around) with a slimmer body (9.9mm) and it would be a killer!!!

      • F
      • Fubar
      • iIS
      • 05 Jan 2010

      Well i dont think this fone is aimed at the highest level. This must be for the mid-range level, which in that case is good enough. How could you possibly tell that the specs are all wrong, even gsmarena team clearly expressed that the specs are unofficial. Unless you're working for samsung as a design engineer, there's no way for you to be so smart enough to tell you're 100% sure gsmarena is wrong with their info.. Sheeshh

        • S
        • Shinigami
        • 3Vm
        • 05 Jan 2010

        Copy the picture with the phone to any image editor, increase vertical size to 150% while keeping horizontal size at 100% (they're locked by default, so unlock them).

        This is what the phone should look like with posted specs. IMO its height is around 96-99mm.

        Budget-minded phone with small AMOLED screen. Nothing interesting.

          • V
          • Vic
          • vxt
          • 05 Jan 2010

          Vic, 04 Jan 2010Guys, I'm 100% sure that the mentioned specs are all wrong.... moreyour condescending man,

            • b
            • boom.dah
            • 390
            • 04 Jan 2010

            Nothing especc, Samsung can do it better...When I saw that new phone is comming I thought it was new suprise from Samsung...Design and specs are low for todays phone standards!

              • V
              • Vic
              • nq4
              • 04 Jan 2010

              Guys, I'm 100% sure that the mentioned specs are all wrong. It just cant be 137 mm high and 15,5 mm thickness with 2.2' screen. Besides that, there is no WLAN, just 960 mAh battery, 5 Mp camera. It looks like a basic phone with limited functionality and there is no reason to put on AMOLED display. In fact specs are very similar with ones for Nokia 6600i Slide, but Nokia is much more compact device. Just compare: http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone2=2805&idPhone1=3074

                • N
                • Nokiaz
                • wHr
                • 04 Jan 2010

                N95 is much better than this junk

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • pux
                  • 04 Jan 2010

                  ugly and low on specs

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • nv6
                    • 04 Jan 2010

                    2,2 screen is too smal, minimum 2,4 on a slide phone!

                      • b
                      • b
                      • 3Jb
                      • 04 Jan 2010

                      Its fat, just like the D600 style.
                      The D900 was ultra thin series.

                        • S
                        • Samsung,Nokia and S
                        • mVi
                        • 04 Jan 2010

                        Anonymous, 29 Dec 2009looks like an upgrade of D900i.. similiar spec with samsung... moreTo me looks like the D520 but whit upgrade and diffrent keyboard.

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • wra
                          • 29 Dec 2009

                          looks like an upgrade of D900i.. similiar spec with samsung soul tough..