Samsung Serenata
- ?
- Anonymous
- iny
- 04 Oct 2007
Go David Lewis from Zone Communications, best phone ever!
- ?
- Anonymous
- mCP
- 04 Oct 2007
I have this phone at the moment. It's actually really intuitive to use after you're familiar with the scroll wheel. It looks good, feels good in the hand and the sound quality is amazing from the speaker. Price is a little high, but come on, isn't everything expensive in Bang and Olufsen's world?
- a
- abby
- vGC
- 04 Oct 2007
This is a joke! lol.. ive used the previous B&O serene , that was really bad , this one is probably better ...but overall bad
- ?
- Anonymous
- YYP
- 04 Oct 2007
it looks like a cross between a wannabe-ipod and a projector remote control.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4I8
- 04 Oct 2007
US$2,000 and only 4GB Memory? No camera. No WiFi. Is Bang & Olufson insane? The iPhone has 8GB of memory. The iPod Touch has 16GB of memory.
- s
- sednin
- w0Q
- 04 Oct 2007
maybe the better sound quality on this phone is only on headset..when it said music phone, it must be best on headset and loudspeaker..it must have a bass
- e
- eddy
- 07T
- 04 Oct 2007
what I hate about this site is that people always vote on the phones although they don't have it. how the hell can you vote on this phone if you've never eve used it?
- k
- kush
- PP$
- 04 Oct 2007
wtf is that? man, it's the ugliest thing i've ever seen... is that a phone?
- ?
- Anonymous
- wgM
- 04 Oct 2007
ugly
- ?
- Anonymous
- kat
- 04 Oct 2007
Ugly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- c
- copperduckie
- q}q
- 04 Oct 2007
another ipod kinda phone again but most likely better sound quility
- F
- Frank
- q{I
- 03 Oct 2007
Nice phone, but why is there no camera.
- ?
- Anonymous
- iie
- 03 Oct 2007
Yes, although overpriced and they get a large profit margin, thats the purpose, to sell a little for high profits. Still normal phones would earn more money by selling more products. theres a target market for each phone. If the serenata is priced at 700, same as n95, it will sell 0 units as people will choose the n95!! Therefore makin the price so high is to attract certain unique rich buyers to get a different market segment
- N
- Nirodha
- i2G
- 03 Oct 2007
The more I think about this B&O Serenata the more I see it is a perfect example of 'luxury branding'; used to sell an overpriced object to those who consider themselves 'classy, elegant and worthy of exclusive products'.
The phone will probably be constructed with about $150 worth of components, and labour, by some overworked and underpaid person in China. And, yet I'm sure Samsung and B&O will mark it up at least 10 times and sell it for $1500+.
All luxury brand manufacturers do the same thing now. For example, most Louis Vuitton bags are made for about $100 in Chinese factories. (Yeah, I know it says made in Paris on them, but they only finish them up there - my wife works in the fashion industry. Therefore, I know the facts about these products.) And, yet LV will charge $1500+ for them, making an enormous profit.
These luxury brand makers are just playing with people's ego for financial gain.
- P
- PlayJaxx
- iBt
- 03 Oct 2007
I don't know why you need a good sound quality for .ogg files, for ex., if you can buy an Iphone or an iPod for less than u$s 2000 (?????!!!!). Sincerelly, I the design looks good, but I don't need it.
- m
- manugsuya
- wYA
- 03 Oct 2007
what a deformed disfigured design
is that suppose to be a phone?
- R
- Ray
- wg@
- 03 Oct 2007
this is hideous... like seriously. really bad.
- H
- HAELLE
- PDP
- 03 Oct 2007
another evidence of samsungs stup.idity.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PDP
- 03 Oct 2007
this fone is nice.nice to throw
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4I8
- 03 Oct 2007
Yes, the official pricing was confirmed: US$2,000 (or 1,400 Euros). Wow! No camera, and the weight is heavy, and they want US$2,000? That is too much. I doubt they will sell a lot. Look at iPhone. iPhone came out at US$600 and then Apple dropped the price after 2 months to US$400. Bang & Olufson should sell this phone at no more than US$1,000. And even at that price, many people would still skip this phone as it would be too expensive. How can B&O justify a whopping US$2,000 for a cell phone with no camera???