Sony Ericsson W900
MORE PICTURES

Sony Ericsson W900

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • I
  • Invincible
  • ms6
  • 19 Nov 2005

why do u think samsung are scared to release their 5 or 7 megapixel camera phone here in europe, its cause they know nokia can make a phone which will make their phone look old and rubbish, thats why samsung only release those kind of phones in their own country, if they try and sell it in europe watch what nokia will do, samsung are scared of nokia, no other phone company including samsung have Wlan, UPnP, TV and M-Peg 4 video recording in their phones and nokia are always the first phone company in europe to add more features to a phone then the rest of them copy nokia to make competition

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • Sky
    • 19 Nov 2005

    hw much enternal memory does da nokia n80 have, i fink 1 of da main factor of y SE W900I is better is because they have a higher internal memory which is big tick 4 me as i want a fone wid a high internal memory, blueooth, usb conn, infrared, very, very loud speakers, radio and all dat

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • 2Zu
      • 19 Nov 2005

      ken 2,5

      i used to be a nokia user.. i am bored with nokia now. My brother used 6600, the keypad is pretty comfortable although they are cramped, similar to my K750.

      the reason why i dun talk about 9500's keypad because i dun really care about such brick--- i only care with small phones (in my own standard, although i found that W900 is a bit overgrown). I'd rather to talk about samsung D500's that i found rather difficult since they are small. RAZR i dun like the keypad design.. looks daggy, although if you use to talk with the phone, it looks very high tech.

      If you are telling me that i am stuck with one company then you are welcome, but it doesn't mean that i have no idea about how the other company's going.

      Also if you asking me to talk about LG's 8120, 8180 keypad, i will just simply say that their keypad is ok and quite comfortable although they got software problems (apparently fixed in newer version, 8380)

        • k
        • ken2.5
        • Nxs
        • 19 Nov 2005

        invincible-did we not finish this arguement already. oh wait unless i am forgetting something, didnt we all gang up on you and show you your way out.

        anyway

        n80 phone of the year 2006-wait unless i am agian forgetting something.w900 december/anuary2006 release.n80 june 2006 which makes it phone of Jun,aug,sep,nov,dec:while w900 will be out for 6 whole months already.
        n80 phone of 2006-very unlikely

        Wlan, UPnP- will be old and very common in any phones before n80 release.

        stereo speakers- how many phones do you know of that are going to be released that do not have stereo speakers(was not refering to w900)

        3mp camera-sony developing it already will be released same time as n80 release. oh and another thing samsung have 5mp camera already.

        ALSO:
        sony is not going bankrupt.
        sony does have better camera(look at
        comparison of equal mp camera, like on
        this website)
        carl zeiss lens will break if you drop your
        phone(+remember no vibrate)
        sony may use cheap plastic but their cameras
        with cheap lens's still beat nokia's
        expensive lens's.

        AND who cares how much the lens really cost

        if nokia is the future of mobile phones, that is nice. but they sure aint now.an camera? ii dont think samsung will agree at all.

          • I
          • Invincible
          • ms6
          • 19 Nov 2005

          all you dudes need to calm down, N80 is the phone of the year 2006, it has Wlan, UPnP, stereo speakers and has a 3 megapixel camera. Sony ericsson will soon be going bankrupt, the phones which they make now have all got old technology and i jus wanted to say nokia's cameras are much better than SE's cameras. Nokia have carl zeiss glass lenses in the n90 and will have it in all of their future phones while sony ericsson's lenses are made from mouldy, bacteria eaten found in the dump cheap plastic lenses. SE then recycle this plastic 10 times until it looks new and then insert it into their phones. The nokia phones which do not have carl zeiss have high quality brand new expensive plastic lenses. Nokia are the future of mobile phones and cameras

            • m
            • mimi
            • M{3
            • 19 Nov 2005

            Its a nice phone but my bro says that k-jam is better but i compared and this one turned out way better!

              • k
              • ken2.5
              • NaD
              • 19 Nov 2005

              viperkid- ui know it wasn't my point. i was merely pointing out the basis of the others statements.(oh and most people never knew about it in the paanasonic, until we egan the discussion on who brought what first)

              BIG- firstly it is bigger. it has a better camera(slightly). it has better UI. it has bigger screen.swivel opening. and other things that you can compare for yourself on this website.

              rizal- if you mean audio out in terms of being aable to connect it to your tv,car,radio or system it has. because like the w800 it has a fast port and supports backwards. so to answer your question it has audio output

              2Zue- i hope you are not a SE fanatic or else we will be at this all day.(i am not stuck to one brand myself)
              also if you are going to talk about keypads then why dont you talk about the 9300,9500,6680,razr,w900

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • 2Zu
                • 19 Nov 2005

                the SE design is a crash, whenever you touch the case there is a lot o noise as if it is on the point to break itself. I don't want this in my phone
                Mvue

                To be honest to tell u.. i can guarantee 100% that sony ericsson's design is more solid than nokias (i know u cannot exchange the original one, too bad if u drop it). take a look at the nokia 6230i, i found that the keypad are extremely cramped and you hardly able to press every single button precisely, especially the four directional button, which is a bit too small yet when you press to one direction it tends to move to the other directions.

                comparing it to K750, with more standard keypad and use of joystick, it is a lot easier and more precise at the same time. If you take alook at t610 (i think that model has the best keypad) it is very solid and you can be assured that you won't press 2 buttons at the same time.

                the same keypad i found in N70 (it looks big but i found that it is smaller than it looks, therefore the keypad is also smaller and yet it is CRAMPED!!) i cannot imagine how i gonna press the buttons, perhaps i will be annoyed because i keep pressing other buttons. 6822, 6680, 7610, also has the similar problems with 6230.

                K700 is ok.. somehow i dun really like it. S700 is easy keypad and it has quite a distance between keypads. i also found that W800's keypad is the most solid among them, when i played around with this fone, it doesn't give u any single creak at all.

                hmm.. thats all that i want to say ^_^

                whoops btw... sometimes brick is better, because it is simple. at least its not like N-gage or E61 or 6280 or 6380? they are not brick, but they are completely ugly.

                  • v
                  • viperkid
                  • TSF
                  • 19 Nov 2005

                  Mvue (no name)
                  i totally agree with you. but i saw somewhere that this W900 has a remote control kinda cool but let's not forget the most important thing about cellphones is its phone features like being to save multiple entries in a field in phonebook, etc. and not its multimedia ones like cameras with auto-focus, flash, et al..

                    • r
                    • rizal
                    • REy
                    • 19 Nov 2005

                    When i look into it's specification, there is no audio out function like w800i.
                    Am i misunderstood ??

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • Mvu
                      • 19 Nov 2005

                      let us be real boys and girls, cause there is no comparison between SE phones and Nokias. the SE design is a crash, whenever you touch the case there is a lot o noise as if it is on the point to break itself. I don't want this in my phone. by comparison to this, nokias are a lot firmer, you don't her a single noise in the case. of course, there are son exceptions in the old nokia but who buys? another important thing is the exchangeable covers that you can put in - the original - and you have another phone for different situations. SE has the best camera indeed but when you buy a phone you don't put on the first place a camera, you want a phone. that's why they are not called cameras with an option like phone calls but phones with an option like cameras. don't you agree? and this one looks completly like a brick.

                        • v
                        • viperkid
                        • TSF
                        • 19 Nov 2005

                        AMH:
                        it was not my intention to disrespect Striker, u see, its just that every1 deserves a true/believable information such as who had the first auto-focus function on a mobile phone. and what i just posted there is not to disrespect striker but to tell him and others like u that what he said is not true regarding that matter. Panasonic may not be the first to have auto-focus on mobile industry (as what Panasonic is claiming on their website) but still its clear that Panasonic was earlier to have auto-focus on cellphones than Sony Ericsson or "Ericsson" as what striker eloquently been saying..

                        Striker:
                        if in any situation, u felt that i've disrespected u, that's not what i meant (as u can see above) but in case... accept my "sorry" if i did disrespect u. but as u can see facts are facts no one can change it, like of what u said who invented bluetooth - Ericsson, a fact that cannot be changed forever. :)

                        ken2.5:
                        locally and/or internationally recognized/popular or not, as long as it is a mobile phone it doesn't change the fact that Panasonic was earlier in releasing mobile phones with auto-focus function than Sony Ericsson. nice to see/hear from u again (too)..

                          • B
                          • BIG
                          • m9N
                          • 19 Nov 2005

                          please someone tell me the difference between w900 and the w800i and the point

                            • B
                            • BIG
                            • m9N
                            • 19 Nov 2005

                            i seriously don't know whats da difference between this and the ever more brilliant w800i but i think its ridicolus that thay keep on releasing phones dat are plain similar to each other

                              • c
                              • chill
                              • iwq
                              • 18 Nov 2005

                              y u all guys r worried dat n80 doesnt have autofocus...well it does hav close-up mode(form 17.5 cm to 23.4 cm) & a normal mode(from 68 cm to infinity) see it here


                              http://www.nokia.com/nseries/index.html?lang=en&country=R1#product,n80

                              n i dont think dat its dat bad...but not as good as autofocus though....but it will still focus close objects n give us sharp focussed pictures....so i dont thing it is much of a problem...as long as we r getting sharp closeup pics...


                              correct me if im wrong..bout this thing....as i've not used digital cameras much...so i dont know much bout autofocus(but kno dat much dat it focuses automatically...duh)....n guys...give me mature replies...coz i dont want ur opinions if those a biased towards ne company...thanx

                                • k
                                • ken2.5
                                • NaD
                                • 18 Nov 2005

                                viperkid nice to see you again. i guess this is round 2 of our ongoing battle. do we really have to start about all these details. i personally do not care whether SE or Samsung gave us the first autofocus camera in a phone. all i know is that it was more internationally recognized in the SE that was what AMH or striker was referring to.

                                also to point out that if you looked at my reviews that were posted and deleted, they are very good. you also had this experience so stop. please. for all.... of us.

                                anyway. it is a shame that the n80 does not have autofocu., but with that lens and picture quality it will be very hard to notice.

                                  • v
                                  • viperkid
                                  • TSF
                                  • 18 Nov 2005

                                  AMH:
                                  again we're talking about phones not digital cameras! ok, i'll be over u, phone with 3mpx cam with reasonable price vs phone with 2mpx cam but more expensive of that 3mpx, which of 'em gives you more? now let's see who's illogical. get a grip!

                                    • A
                                    • AMH
                                    • mSB
                                    • 18 Nov 2005

                                    Viperkid, be real man, cameras are a part of mobile phones whether you like it or not! and you out of all people would choose a phone with a better camera quality on a phone with poor camera with the same other functions.
                                    And dont talk about old ericsson phones with 1 character. That´s so, i dont know what to call it.
                                    Anyways be logical man.

                                      • A
                                      • AMH
                                      • mSB
                                      • 18 Nov 2005

                                      Viperkid, close this subject about comparision, i didn´t compare the w900i, i said it´s a shame such phone with such feature to lack Autofocus.
                                      And do apologize to striker even if he didn´t supply the links, because you should know that what you said disrespected the man.

                                        • v
                                        • viperkid
                                        • TSF
                                        • 18 Nov 2005

                                        AMH:
                                        no in (old SE phones), u can't save other phone nos. in other pages inside each contact, cuz those pages i believe is for postal address, etc.. well its definitely not a big mistake for a phone (like N80) to have 3mpx cam w/out autofocus its more likely a big mistake for a phone to only save 1 entry of each field (i.e. 1 office #, 1 cell #, home #, etc under 1 name) in a phonebook! and AMH don't forget we're talking about phones here not digital cameras! is that clear?!?! we're not in a digital camera forum we're on a mobile phone forum! oops i forgot older phonebooks in SE phones can only accept 1 character when searching names which is very ineffective especially when u have 20 entries under a letter, annoying!