Sony Ericsson W900
MORE PICTURES

Sony Ericsson W900

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • b
  • blank
  • EqW
  • 28 Oct 2005

does da camera lens have protect cover????

    • C
    • Coyote
    • mGI
    • 28 Oct 2005

    In the last 5 years i changed at least 10 different phones(Nokia,Siemens,Samsung...)and before 6 months I both first time in my life a SE (k750i).That's just a great phone in everuday use(calls,photos,radio,bluetooth)for the customers that don't expect fast PC from their mobiel phone and a lots of stuff that you almost don't use in everyday life.
    Nokia phones are too expensive for ordinary people,with not so god camera and desing is poor in last couple of years.
    Next year I probably buy SE with new contract
    and Moto V3x or Samsung D600 for my girlfrend
    because their desing is something special.
    People can also seen on the European streets
    this year a quite more SE than in the last few years in comparation with Nokia.That fact speaks for itself.
    Sorry for bad English.

      • b
      • beatrice asamah
      • mcu
      • 28 Oct 2005

      se is best of this year i want to no that is uses remoe connection and also can u tell me the price of it am glad to uses for this year x-mas,is something great in the system nown whenmy friends see it

        • D
        • Dirk Pitt
        • PSd
        • 28 Oct 2005

        The phone is just amazing, and i just find it hilarious when people consider the Nokia N70 and N90 better than this phone especially in terms of cam performance, well the Nokia phones may have Carl Zeis lens but thats just the name, even if u read the comparitive reviews of Nokia phones with Sony Ericsson K750i/W800 the Sony Ericsson outclasses them, just read the review currently on homepage of the website for reference. Sony Ericsson rules, the only thing now Sony Ericsson should do is move to the 16 million or higher screen colors, I had an S700i and that was outstanding, true to every word of the review a real champion, and W900 is a good upgrade on it, looking forward to it,

          • N
          • NIKUNJ MEWADA
          • PS@
          • 27 Oct 2005

          sony is sony (world best phone)

            • G
            • Giannis
            • Sjm
            • 27 Oct 2005

            ERIC

            Dataspeed 32-48 when UMTS is NOT availiable and GPRS is in use.
            But when UMTS is there the speed is 384 kbps.
            I'm sure about this coz if the speed was only 32-48 with UMTS ,then videocall would't be possible(videocall needs highspeed network) ;)

              • e
              • eric
              • PSM
              • 27 Oct 2005

              as far as my opinion goes i think its an awesome phone the camera will be CLEARLY much better than the nokia n series coz any1 whos used dat phone will realise dat ...a thing dat worries me might b the price tag if its as competitive as the w800 then its like mobile heaven.well i just was wondering dat for a 3g capable umts phone its data speed is kinda slow ?is the figure correct/ i mean 32-48 kbps is slow for a 3g umts phone and as for its size itll be part of its appeal though i wouldnt recommend it to a corporate guy .its best for a real carefree funlovin type like me :)

                • I
                • Invincible
                • ms6
                • 27 Oct 2005

                Nokia N90 is much better than this phone

                N90 has carl zeiss optics while the W900 has a cheap plastic lens
                N90 is a symbian phone and the W900 isn't
                N90 has EDGE and W900 has GPRS
                N90 has 20 x zoom and W900 has only 4 x zoom
                N90 video (352 x 288 pixels) W900 (176 x 144 pixels)
                N90 can twist and turn, W900 looks like a brick

                N90 is the phone of the year 2005

                  • A
                  • Aparadectos
                  • MMt
                  • 27 Oct 2005

                  Its a same to compare those phones since they arent in the same class,
                  3g vs edge everybody has his opinion,u sould chooce by ur self on that,
                  the display SE has is always a little bit better than Nokia's
                  W900 carries one of the best screens SE made so far(resolution)
                  it will be much better what a medium to good Nokia may offer(3250),
                  on memory if the 1 vs 2 and (eventually 4gb) doesnt make the dif 4 u then think about the 479MB of internal memory W900 has,
                  that means u wont have to invest any money from the beginning and may wait till the mem crds become even cheaper,
                  on camera W900 is going to be even better than W800(one of the best cams in the market)and the W800 cam is better than 3250's,
                  the feature battle is somewhat balanced W900 wins again,
                  on the battery sector u sould already know SE has no opponents,
                  this is not an exception to the rule,
                  the design and style is smth v.personal u sould decide,
                  i like both of them
                  and finally about music W900 wins hand down as its his speciality,
                  no other phone can be compared in this sector,if music is the thing that matters more for u than u dont have much to think about...

                    • m
                    • michael
                    • Pc6
                    • 27 Oct 2005

                    y prefer de w900 de mem is up tu 2GB de nokia is up tu 1GB
                    de cam. are de same.. but de w900 1632x1224 and de nokia es 1600x1200...
                    also.. de w900 has infraport..
                    I prefer de sony ericsson.. FOR ME HAS A BETTER DESING..

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • nDb
                      • 27 Oct 2005

                      yse is da best

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • nDb
                        • 27 Oct 2005

                        yo people, can somebody help me out, i don't know which phone i should buy, the nokia 3250 or this the SE W900I, they're both great phones which r yet t o be relesed but i can't make my mind up, can someone list the pros and cons of each phone AND BE FAIR, don't give too many pros to se w900i and cons to nokia 3250 vice versa, so i hope many of u out their will help me into making my decision
                        thxs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                          • m
                          • michael
                          • PwP
                          • 26 Oct 2005

                          is really a very brilliant cel.
                          but.. I just want tu know if somebdy knows when this phone will be aveilable tu buyt it?? thanks

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • nDb
                            • 26 Oct 2005

                            does this phone cum with rippind software like the se w800i which will make this the best fone of it time

                              • G
                              • Giannis
                              • Sjm
                              • 26 Oct 2005

                              Striker

                              I'm happy that the mechanism of s700 is good.The same for the mechanism of v800.I did't say(for v800) that there is a problem,I just said that it is very fragile.Till now(I have the phone for 6 months)is as it was the first day.BUT from the first day the mechanism was fragile.This just has broken the feeling of reliability.Nothing more.
                              The last Nokia I had bought was 6210(5 years ago)I will never buy a Nokia again.

                                • I
                                • Io
                                • nye
                                • 26 Oct 2005

                                SE menus rule.first class phone right here.Only REAL issue would be it's weight but if you see yourself with a 2MP WALKMAN cardslot bluetooth 3G phone that's something you can easily overlook.So what,it's a bit bulky,but YOU and EVERYONE ELSE will love it :)

                                  • D
                                  • Deano
                                  • mf}
                                  • 26 Oct 2005

                                  I dont know why anyone would have a bad opion of this handset. It has everything you need ie. Massive internal memory (NOT TO MENTION EXPANDABLE) brilliant picture quality and loads more to offer. The only small downside I could possibly think of would be the ease of navigating the menu facilities. However-not really a major concern.

                                    • s
                                    • sam
                                    • RK4
                                    • 26 Oct 2005

                                    ^^^^^hats off^^^^!!!

                                      • S
                                      • Sno
                                      • TS%
                                      • 26 Oct 2005

                                      just read the n70 review. well all in all im definitely gonna hv w900 for xmas (if its available). SE rules!

                                        • y
                                        • yw
                                        • iJf
                                        • 26 Oct 2005

                                        i'm disagree with rune
                                        yea, maybe 5 years ago nokia still can own handphone market but now
                                        SE is getting better and better, and soon samsung is coming up too
                                        so if i get W900i or Z800i, i wont regret with it but if u ask me to get N-series i will !! :D