Sony Xperia T2 Ultra review: The bigger, the better

The bigger, the better

GSMArena team, 09 May 2014.

Synthetic benchmarks

Sony Xperia T2 Ultra is running on the Snapdragon 400 mid-range chipset. It offers four Cortex-A7 CPU cores, Adreno 305 graphics and 1GB of RAM. We've already seen the S400 in action on the Motorola Moto G and it delivered a snappy performance. Hopefully, the light Sony UI and the Android 4.3 Jelly Bean can provide for a great performance on the T2 Ultra as well.

Starting off with the CPU benchmarks, the Xperia T2 Ultra posted some mid-range numbers, quite expected for this processor. The single-core performance is slightly better when compared to other Cortex-A7-powered devices such as the Moto G and Xperia C.

Benchmark Pi

Lower is better

  • LG G Flex
    99
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    99
  • LG G2
    99
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
    104
  • Sony Xperia Z1
    115
  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    115
  • HTC One (M8)
    121
  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    128
  • HTC One Max
    131
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    132
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    132
  • LG G Pro 2
    141
  • LG Nexus 5
    146
  • HTC One
    151
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    166
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    183
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    211
  • Huawei Ascend P7
    271
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II
    305
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    306
  • Alcatel One Touch Hero
    308
  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    347
  • Huawei Ascend P6
    348
  • LG Optimus G
    353
  • Sony Xperia C
    374
  • Motorola Moto G
    392
  • Sony Xperia M
    400
  • LG Nexus 4
    431
  • Samsung Galaxy Core LTE
    466
  • Nokia X
    676

The T2 Ultra posted good results on the multi-core GeekBench 3 cross-platform benchmark. While the score pales in comparison to the latest Krait processors, the T2 Ultra does better than the Moto G and Xperia C and better than the first-gen Krait and Cortex-A9 devices.

Geekbench 3

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    3011
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
    2968
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    2937
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    2842
  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    2670
  • Sony Xperia Z1
    2638
  • LG G Pro 2
    2585
  • Apple iPhone 5s
    2561
  • LG Nexus 5
    2453
  • HTC One (M8)
    2367
  • LG G Flex
    2254
  • LG G2
    2243
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    2172
  • HTC One
    1972
  • Huawei Ascend P7
    1895
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    1869
  • LG Optimus G
    1465
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    1359
  • Alcatel One Touch Hero
    1321
  • Huawei Ascend P6
    1315
  • LG Nexus 4
    1288
  • Motorola Moto G
    1120
  • Sony Xperia C
    1079
  • Oppo R819
    1047
  • HTC One mini
    887
  • Samsung Galaxy Core LTE
    647
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
    564
  • Nokia X
    421

Quadrant and AnTuTu are compound benchmarks, which also take into account RAM and GPU performance. Quadrant's score is rather unimpressive, while AnTuTu's numbers are quite good, once again slightly better than the quad-core Cortex-A7-powered Moto G and Xperia C.

Quadrant

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    25044
  • HTC One (M8)
    25035
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
    21618
  • LG G Flex
    20521
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    20420
  • Sony Xperia Z1
    20388
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    20052
  • LG G Pro 2
    20010
  • LG G2
    19815
  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    18177
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    12446
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    12376
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    12105
  • HTC One
    11746
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    11404
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    9453
  • LG Nexus 5
    8844
  • Huawei Ascend P7
    7781
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    7153
  • HTC One mini
    6048
  • Sony Xperia V
    5816
  • HTC Desire 600 dual sim
    5053
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    4998
  • Sony Xperia C
    4941
  • Sony Xperia L
    4279
  • Sony Xperia M
    4147
  • Samsung Galaxy Core
    3240
  • Nokia X
    2880

AnTuTu 4

Higher is better

  • HTC One (M8)
    37009
  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    36018
  • LG G Flex
    35831
  • LG G2
    35444
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
    34527
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    32162
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    31717
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    31109
  • Sony Xperia Z1
    30850
  • LG G Pro 2
    29603
  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    29185
  • Samsung Galaxy S4
    27613
  • HTC One
    26389
  • Huawei Ascend P7
    25812
  • LG Nexus 5
    25097
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    19896
  • Motorola Moto G
    17214
  • LG Optimus G
    16943
  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    15714
  • Alcatel One Touch Hero
    15667
  • Oppo Find 5
    15167
  • Sony Xperia C
    13948
  • Samsung Galaxy Core LTE
    13109
  • Sony Xperia M
    9902
  • Nokia X
    7514

The graphics benchmark results didn't come out that hot though. The GFXBench tests - both off-screen and on-screen variants - reflected some very poor performance.

GFX Benchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One (M8)
    28.4
  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    27.8
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    26.3
  • LG Nexus 5
    23
  • Sony Xperia Z1
    23
  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    23
  • Apple iPhone 5s
    23
  • LG G Pro 2
    22.9
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
    22
  • LG G Flex
    22
  • LG G2
    22
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    17.1
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    17.1
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    15
  • Huawei Ascend P7
    12.3
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    10.9
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    6.4
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    5.8
  • Sony Xperia C
    2.8

GFX Benchmark 2.7 T-Rex (on-screen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 5s
    37
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
    34
  • LG G Flex
    33
  • HTC One (M8)
    30.1
  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    28.1
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    26.7
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    25
  • LG G Pro 2
    24.1
  • LG Nexus 5
    24
  • LG G2
    23.1
  • Huawei Ascend P7
    12.4
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    10.9
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    10.6
  • Sony Xperia C
    7.3

GFX Benchmark 3.0 Manhattan (on-screen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One (M8)
    11.9
  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    11.7
  • Oppo Find 7a
    11.4
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    10
  • LG G Pro 2
    9.2
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4
    5
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    4.7
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    4.1
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand 2
    4.0

Web browsing shows the Sony Xperia T2 Ultra does OK on the JavaScript SunSpider test.

SunSpider

Lower is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S5
    379
  • Apple iPhone 5s
    403
  • LG G Pro 2
    536
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
    568
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    587
  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    750
  • HTC One (M8)
    780
  • LG Nexus 5
    827
  • Sony Xperia Z1
    845
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
    855
  • LG G2
    908
  • Alcatel Idol X+
    931
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    1046
  • HTC One
    1174
  • Huawei Ascend P7
    1307
  • Motorola Moto G
    1308
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    1325
  • Sony Xperia Z
    1336
  • Oppo R819
    1423
  • HTC Butterfly
    1433
  • Alcatel One Touch Hero
    1646
  • Samsung Galaxy Core LTE
    1680
  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    1741
  • Sony Xperia M
    1867
  • Nokia X
    2363
  • Huawei Ascend P6
    3858

So, the Snapdragon 400 chipset turned out the mid-range performer we expected it to be – nothing more and nothing less. It doesn’t really stand out from the other mid-rangers but it’s as good as most of its competitors.

While the T2 Ultra benchmark scores are nothing spectacular, it does great when it comes to playing games, web browsing, 1080p video playback or even multi-tasking. The UI experience is buttery smooth too and we can't complain of lag, stutter, annoying loadings or crashes.

Reader comments

  • AnonD-622558
  • 19 Dec 2016
  • ubI

Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Duel a very nice phone call. I've been using for the past two years. But suddenly the phone for three months is a problem. The problem is, Loud speaker phone does not work, but..when I installed sound About application, then th...

  • cestasol12
  • 26 Aug 2016
  • v{Z

very nice mobile

  • Bijit
  • 14 May 2016
  • wiS

Secondary camera is too poor. So, I sold my XPERIA T2 ULTRA.