vivo X200 review

GSMArena Team, 24 January 2025.

Reasonably capable 6.67-inch OLED display

The vivo X200 has a nice-looking OLED display that's got a few omissions but nothing that's necessarily going to be a dealbreaker. It lacks Dolby Vision, and it's not an LTPO panel, so it's only modestly adaptive in its refresh rate adjustments.

vivo X200 review

The 6.67-inch diagonal is a hair smaller than that of the X200 Pro (6.78") and the OnePlus 13 (6.82"), but just a touch larger than the Find X8's 6.59" screen. The 1,260x2,800px resolution works out to a 460ppi pixel density, and the aspect ratio is 20:9. The refresh rate maxes out at 120Hz which is more important than the fact that the panel can't go below 60Hz. There's also 2160Hz PWM dimming for a flicker-free experience at lower brightnesses.

We measured a maximum brightness of 1,563nits in adaptive brightness mode with the phone placed under bright light which is a great result in the X200's context - the OnePlus 13 and the Find X8 are lower on this chart and even the Galaxy S24+ isn't quite as bright. In manual operation, we got just under 600nits, which, while perfectly okay, is a bit conservative - we'd expect something in the 700-800nits range these days.

Max display brightness test

White test pattern, 75% fill (nits)

  • Manual mode
  • Auto mode
Pixel 9 Pro Pixel 9 Pro
1298
6.3" LTPO OLED 1280 x 2856 px
Realme GT 7 Pro Realme GT 7 Pro
1095
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1264 x 2780 px
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
900
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
Oppo Find X8 Oppo Find X8
878
6.59" AMOLED 1256 x 2760 px
OnePlus 13 OnePlus 13
809
6.82" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3168 px
Galaxy S24+ Galaxy S24+
781
6.7" Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 1440 x 3120 px
Honor Magic7 Pro Honor Magic7 Pro
750
6.8" LTPO AMOLED 1280 x 2800 px
vivo X200 Pro vivo X200 Pro
619
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1260 x 2800 px
nubia Z70 Ultra nubia Z70 Ultra
618
6.85" LTPO AMOLED 1216 x 2688 px
vivo X200 vivo X200
593
6.67" AMOLED 1260 x 2800 px
iQOO 13 iQOO 13
515
6.82" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3168 px
Realme GT 7 Pro Realme GT 7 Pro
2336
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1264 x 2780 px
Pixel 9 Pro Pixel 9 Pro
2331
6.3" LTPO OLED 1280 x 2856 px
vivo X200 Pro vivo X200 Pro
1881
6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1260 x 2800 px
iQOO 13 iQOO 13
1804
6.82" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3168 px
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
1764
6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 1206 x 2622 px
vivo X200 vivo X200
1563
6.67" AMOLED 1260 x 2800 px
Honor Magic7 Pro Honor Magic7 Pro
1521
6.8" LTPO AMOLED 1280 x 2800 px
Galaxy S24+ Galaxy S24+
1452
6.7" Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 1440 x 3120 px
nubia Z70 Ultra nubia Z70 Ultra
1382
6.85" LTPO AMOLED 1216 x 2688 px
Oppo Find X8 Oppo Find X8
1364
6.59" AMOLED 1256 x 2760 px
OnePlus 13 OnePlus 13
1204
6.82" LTPO AMOLED 1440 x 3168 px

Refresh rate

The X200 doesn't advertise the same 0.1Hz refresh rate minimum that the Pro is supposedly capable of. In fact, since it's not an LTPO panel, it's not capable of doing on-the-fly refresh rate adjustments and only appears to support fixed values of 60Hz, 90Hz and 120Hz. If you're in High or Smart Switch mode, it will dial down to 60Hz when idling, of course, and quickly shoot up to 120Hz when you touch it, but that's about it.

vivo X200 review

When it comes to games, for some titles we were able to force the 120Hz display mode, though not necessarily get the game to go above 60fps. There were other games that we tested that support a high frame rate, but the phone refused to give them the 120Hz mode.

Streaming and HDR

With the X200, you'll get support for HDR10 and HDR10+, but not Dolby Vision - the X200 Pro does have that checkmark and so too do the Find X8 and the OnePlus 13.

In the absence of Dolby Vision, Netflix only supports HDR10 on the X200, but it's still something, and you'll be getting FullHD streams too, thanks to the Widevine L1 compliance. YouTube was also happy to serve HDR content in its full glory (or at least HDR10 glory).

vivo X200 review

The phone also supports the Android Ultra HDR photo standard for displaying HDR photos with a brightness boost for highlights. We're still having the occasional run-in with a handset that's not fully compliant, so it's good that the X200 doesn't go on that list. Here, it works in the in-house gallery, but also in Google Photos, and in Chrome - for images from other phones, too.

vivo X200 battery life

The X200 draws power from a 5,800mAh battery with a silicon carbon (Si/C) anode - so it's a pretty large capacity and the latest chemistry too. The OnePlus 13 has a bit more juice (6,000mAh), while the Oppo Find X8 has slightly less (5,630mAh).

Mind you, for one reason or another, the version of the X200 sold in Austria has a smaller 5,220mAh battery. It's an oddly specific regional differentiation, and it will inevitably affect the phone's longevity.

In our testing of the 5,800mAh version, the X200 placed right inbetween the above two competitors in web browsing and video playback, while outlasting them both in our gaming test. On the flipside, the call time turned out on the lower end of the spectrum.

All in all, with an Active Use Score of 14:51h in our standard usage split, the X200 is a dependable package that shouldn't be causing you any battery life anxiety.

Our new Active Use Score is an estimate of how long the battery will last if you use the device with a mix of all four test activities. You can adjust the calculation based on your usage pattern using the sliders below. You can read about our current battery life testing procedure here. For a comprehensive list of all tested devices so far, head this way.

Charging speed

When it does run out of power, the X200 charges pretty fast too. Depending on where you are in the world, it may come bundled with a 90W adaptor, which is what the phone is expected to receive at most, though we all know these numbers aren't an exact science.

vivo X200 review

In our testing, using the 90W charger that came in the box, we clocked an empty-to-full time of 39 minutes, with the battery indicator showing 78% at the half-hour mark. We got a 73W peak value on our power meter at the early stages of the charging process, with the usual quick drop after the first few percent.

There are competitors that charge faster, but not by a lot - we haven't been getting crazy fast charging these past few months.

Charging speed

  • in 15 min
  • in 30 min
  • Time to full charge (from 0%)
iQOO 13 iQOO 13
58%
6000 mAh 120W
Realme GT 7 Pro Realme GT 7 Pro
58%
6500 mAh 120W
OnePlus 13 OnePlus 13
55%
6000 mAh 100W
Honor Magic7 Pro Honor Magic7 Pro
51%
5270 mAh 100W
nubia Z70 Ultra nubia Z70 Ultra
47%
6150 mAh 80W
vivo X200 vivo X200
43%
5800 mAh 90W
Galaxy S24+ Galaxy S24+
41%
4900 mAh 45W
Oppo Find X8 Oppo Find X8
40%
5630 mAh 80W
vivo X200 Pro vivo X200 Pro
37%
6000 mAh 90W
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
33%
3582 mAh
Pixel 9 Pro Pixel 9 Pro
30%
4700 mAh 45W PD
OnePlus 13 OnePlus 13
95%
6000 mAh 100W
Realme GT 7 Pro Realme GT 7 Pro
94%
6500 mAh 120W
iQOO 13 iQOO 13
91%
6000 mAh 120W
Honor Magic7 Pro Honor Magic7 Pro
90%
5270 mAh 100W
nubia Z70 Ultra nubia Z70 Ultra
84%
6150 mAh 80W
vivo X200 vivo X200
78%
5800 mAh 90W
Galaxy S24+ Galaxy S24+
74%
4900 mAh 45W
Oppo Find X8 Oppo Find X8
70%
5630 mAh 80W
vivo X200 Pro vivo X200 Pro
68%
6000 mAh 90W
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
58%
3582 mAh
Pixel 9 Pro Pixel 9 Pro
56%
4700 mAh 45W PD
iQOO 13 iQOO 13
0:32h
6000 mAh 120W
OnePlus 13 OnePlus 13
0:35h
6000 mAh 100W
Realme GT 7 Pro Realme GT 7 Pro
0:35h
6500 mAh 120W
Honor Magic7 Pro Honor Magic7 Pro
0:36h
5270 mAh 100W
vivo X200 vivo X200
0:39h
5800 mAh 90W
nubia Z70 Ultra nubia Z70 Ultra
0:42h
6150 mAh 80W
vivo X200 Pro vivo X200 Pro
0:49h
6000 mAh 90W
Oppo Find X8 Oppo Find X8
0:52h
5630 mAh 80W
Galaxy S24+ Galaxy S24+
0:58h
4900 mAh 45W
Pixel 9 Pro Pixel 9 Pro
1:24h
4700 mAh 45W PD
iPhone 16 Pro iPhone 16 Pro
1:38h
3582 mAh

One sort of major omission from the X200's specsheet is wireless charging - you'll need to go Pro to get that. That's not the case with some rivals - both the Oppo X8 and the OnePlus 13 can do wireless charging, and so too can the Galaxies, whether last year's models or the brand new S25s.

You do get a host of options to extend the life of your battery in the long run. You can keep the fast charging off and only tap on the prompt to engage it on a case by case basis. There's also the usual 'Optimized battery charging' option that will learn your charging habits and do the final top-off just before the time you typically pick up your phone from the charger. There's no option to limit charging to a certain level (90% or 80%, for example).

Speaker test

You get a standard hybrid speaker arrangement on the X200 with the earpiece and a dedicated bottom-firing speaker working in tandem to form a stereo pair. The top speaker gets the left channel in portrait orientation, and the speakers switch channels depending on the landscape orientation.

Bottom speaker - vivo X200 review Top speaker - vivo X200 review Earpiece - vivo X200 review
Bottom speaker • Top speaker • Earpiece

The X200 earned a 'Good' rating for loudness in our testing, a notch below immediate rivals' predominantly 'Very Good' results. In terms of quality, it's actually not half bad, delivering clear vocals without being mid-forward. It also has a superior low-end thump compared to the X200 Pro. The Find X8 does probably have the upper hand though.

Use the Playback controls to listen to the phone sample recordings (best use headphones). We measure the average loudness of the speakers in LUFS. A lower absolute value means a louder sound. A look at the frequency response chart will tell you how far off the ideal "0db" flat line is the reproduction of the bass, treble, and mid frequencies. You can add more phones to compare how they differ. The scores and ratings are not comparable with our older loudspeaker test. Learn more about how we test here.

Reader comments

The review have been corrected, at first it mentionned a 60hr and non lpto display, the 60hz mention is gone. Glad to have 120hz as 60 for this price would have been problematic. I'm eager to see more of this but cheaper. 999 for FunTouch OS, ...

Last year they were OK. At least a bit cheaper than the Xiaomi 14 for example but the same as the Oppo Find x7 which was better. This year though it's basically taking the Samsung route and rehashing the same phone. No camera upgrades really. Th...

You' ve got that wrong, it is NOT a 60Hz display 😅 Try and read again.