Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 review: In shiny armor

In shiny armor

GSMArena team, 25 December, 2015.

Performance

Just like its predecessor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 powered by the MediaTek's MT6795 chipset, also known as Helio X10. Unlike what the name suggests, the processor is actually an octa-core 2GHz Cortex-A53, accompanied by a PowerVR G6200 (Rogue) GPU and 2GB of RAM.

If you'd prefer more RAM, you can opt for the 3GB RAM model, which also doubles the internal storage up to 32GB. Our review unit however is of the 16GB variety.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 review

GeekBench 3 gauges the multi-core performance of the processor and the Redmi Note 3, unsurprisingly, is outing the same score as its Note 2 sibling. It's a flagship-grade one, though somewhat lower than the Meizu's MX5 and m1 metal, which are also running on the same chips.

GeekBench 3

Higher is better

  • Meizu MX5
    5110
  • Meizu m1 metal
    4825
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    4589
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    4537
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    4067
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    3554
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    3321
  • Oppo R7s
    3206
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note
    2435
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    2336
  • OnePlus X
    2297

The compound AnTuTu 5 bench deems the Redmi Note 3 equal to the rest of the Helio X10 handsets - the MX5, m1 metal, and Redmi Note 2.

AnTuTu 5

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    50875
  • Meizu m1 metal
    49508
  • Meizu MX5
    48915
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    47816
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    46307
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    46283
  • OnePlus X
    39990
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    38786
  • Oppo R7s
    37857
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    34491
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note
    32487

Basemark OS II 2.0 calculates CPU, GPU, memory, OS and web performance and mashes it all up into a single score. The Redmi Note 3 is on par with the Redmi Note 2 and Meizu m1 metal. It manages to beats the Xperia M5, but falls behind the MX5.

Basemark OS 2.0

Higher is better

  • Meizu MX5
    1252
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    1233
  • OnePlus X
    1213
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    1063
  • Meizu m1 metal
    1039
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    1018
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    984
  • Oppo R7s
    930
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    860
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note
    479
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    296

Quite expectedly, a single Cortex-A53 processor core running at 2GHz is a real beast, while eight of those are indeed a blazing fast configuration.

Basemark OS 2.0 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    5739
  • OnePlus X
    5118
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    3434
  • Meizu MX5
    3262
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    3008
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    2990
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    2551
  • Meizu m1 metal
    2439
  • Oppo R7s
    2418
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note
    2388
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    2065

Basemark OS 2.0 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    24979
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    24538
  • Meizu MX5
    22976
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    21516
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note
    18490
  • Meizu m1 metal
    17481
  • OnePlus X
    16983
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    14276
  • Oppo R7s
    13882
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    13521
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    7891

PowerVR G6200 GPU is perfectly capable of handling 1080p displays. Its raw offscreen performance is better than the widespread Adreno 405 within the Snapdragon 615, so we guess the Helio X10 is the smarter choice for the 1080p upper mid-rangers. The only threat comes from the Snapdragon 808's Adreno 418 (Xiaomi Mi 4c), which seems to be the better performer. The aging Adreno 330, once a royalty, is also better. And we still can't explain the MX5's win, which has identical specs.

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    15
  • Meizu MX5
    10
  • OnePlus X
    9.9
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    8.5
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    8.5
  • Meizu m1 metal
    8.4
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    8.4
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    6.2
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    6.1
  • Oppo R7s
    5.9

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    10
  • Meizu MX5
    4.8
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    4.5
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    4
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    4
  • Meizu m1 metal
    4
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    2.9

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    15
  • OnePlus X
    10
  • Meizu MX5
    9.5
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    8.7
  • Meizu m1 metal
    8
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    7.9
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    7.9
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    6.2
  • Oppo R7s
    6.2
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    6.1

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    9.7
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    4.9
  • Meizu MX5
    4.7
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    3.9
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    3.9
  • Meizu m1 metal
    3.9
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    2.9

The GPU bench Basemark X confirms our findings.

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    12096
  • OnePlus X
    10572
  • Meizu MX5
    10403
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
    8540
  • Meizu m1 metal
    8526
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
    8518
  • Sony Xperia M5 Dual
    7780
  • Lenovo K3 Note
    5656
  • Oppo R7s
    5302
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i
    4875
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note
    2974

The Helio X10 inside the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 is a great performer for such an affordable device and a real powerhouse. There is nothing the Helio X10 can't handle on the Redmi Note 3's 1080p display and we are sure the Xiaomi fans will appreciate the choice of platform and all the software optimizations the company has done on the MIUI 7 launcher.

Reader comments

  • Ify
  • 04 Jun 2017
  • yZt

Redmi note 3 good phone but only 4 month use sometimes hanging no charging and automatic switch off😣😣

  • AnonD-657751
  • 31 Mar 2017
  • D01

I had note 2 so when note 3 released i purchased but within a month realise what mistake had done. It's no longer the same as it was. Continue hang, slow down, heated up. Same things happen with my friend's too. Xiaomi lost It's charm as it was. V...

  • Ramkesh Meena
  • 28 Mar 2017
  • gN$

Mi Redmi note 3 phone service is very bad every 5 minutes temperature very high cool down then after 5 minutes temperature is very high I advice for you not purchase mi product not successful mobile.