HTC Snap
MORE PICTURES

HTC Snap

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • M
  • Minh Nguyen
  • vNV
  • 02 Apr 2009

This is absolutely the phone that I've been waiting for from HTC. Gotta get it!

    • D
    • Deep
    • NH$
    • 02 Apr 2009

    Great looks....hope pricing is resonable.

      • H
      • Hello
      • 2CV
      • 02 Apr 2009

      suck, 02 Apr 2009lol still use 65k colour lol expensive os with cheap features lolYou mean expensive os that is limiting the screen to 65k colours.

        • s
        • suck
        • M@T
        • 02 Apr 2009

        lol still use 65k colour lol expensive os with cheap features lol

          • A
          • Affan
          • wuc
          • 02 Apr 2009

          This is a very nice phone. Looks awesome, way much beautiful than E71 or Blackberry Bold & 8900.
          Has and advantage over E71 in the sense that this beauty has a higher processor and higher ram.
          Blackberry sucks in the sense that u need to have a BIS account to access ur mail.
          WinMo doesnt have those limitations.
          spec wise it has all the stuff, that E71 or 8900 has.
          will. it packs both wifi and gps. and as far as camera is concerned, htc has fine camera quality.

            • s
            • simon
            • mx2
            • 02 Apr 2009

            average phone with average spec hope its got an average price tag....

              • F
              • FidoMan
              • kWx
              • 02 Apr 2009

              This looks just like a blackberry, and i truly cant blame HTC for going for a more BB look. The Bold and the 8900 have done great buisness!!! and if i was to assume anything is that they are throwing their hand into a open face full qwrty with a good email system. although i dont know if anyone will be able to do emails quite as good as blackberry, a very cool phone though

                • B
                • BJ
                • x2j
                • 01 Apr 2009

                People shouldn't stress the 2MP thing. Nokia's E71 has 3.2MP and its sucks. Iphone has 2MP ans is way better than the 3.2MP from the Nokia's E71

                  • G
                  • Gus
                  • Peq
                  • 01 Apr 2009

                  It's a WM Professional ?? I think it's a WM Standar.. anyway.. it's a WM.. nice!

                    • L
                    • Leo
                    • G2G
                    • 01 Apr 2009

                    Anonymous, 01 Apr 2009if this had been released a year ago i think it would have ... moreI don't think it's meant to compete directly with the Bold and the E71... This is more of an entry level device... Looks very nice and the specs sheet, although not impressive, seems to be sufficient for this type of device!

                      • Z
                      • Zobi
                      • k@U
                      • 01 Apr 2009

                      Not bad. I wonder why them not like it.

                        • A
                        • ACE
                        • khX
                        • 01 Apr 2009

                        Great Looking Phone...Itz gonna be hard to sell tho..lots of comp...but depending on the $tag and carrier it cud do well...Camera not up to par

                          • c
                          • comme d'habitude
                          • S7s
                          • 01 Apr 2009

                          Anonymous, 01 Apr 2009if this had been released a year ago i think it would have ... morei couldn't agree more. but i think this will sell based on looks more than its features. the phone is exceedingly beautiful!

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • myU
                            • 01 Apr 2009

                            if this had been released a year ago i think it would have sold well, but with the nokia e71, blackberry bold and 8900 around, it's already dated.