New Galaxy S8 and S8 Plus schematics come with precise dimensions
- ?
- Anonymous
- rHQ
- 08 Mar 2017
Anonymous, 08 Feb 2017S8's vertical dimension is not correctly written in the pic... more18.5:9 with a 144mm hypotenuse would actually be a 124mm height.
- ?
- Anonymous
- T4}
- 08 Feb 2017
S8's vertical dimension is not correctly written in the picture.both screen and the outer dimension is written as 131mm.screen is probably 131mm and phone itself should be around 140mm.source picture may have the mistake but,editor shouldn't have missed this in the article.
- A
- Alexandru
- mK9
- 03 Feb 2017
Looks like HTC! LG G6 looks better.
- ?
- Anonymous
- S3C
- 03 Feb 2017
get ready to waste money!
- g
- gigi
- 0NX
- 02 Feb 2017
s7 edge-150,9x72,6 -5,7 inch
s8 plus- 159,53x73,37-6,1 inch -slightly taller and wider than the current S7 edge,is this a joke?
s8-131,58x68,5
I think the author of the article must read before posting.
- D
- AnonD-633729
- 6p$
- 02 Feb 2017
Artist, 01 Feb 2017Fingerprint sensor position seems awkward and no home butto... more"front Samsung logo makes this just like another brandless Chinese phones"
It makes no sense at all. Lol. Are you that stup!d?
- ?
- Anonymous
- Nv$
- 02 Feb 2017
That will sound marvelous if that S8 mobile will really hold 6GB with 64 ROM. I'll take whatever is possible to get, i missed S7 edge and why should i wait? i wont!
- ?
- Anonymous
- HjB
- 02 Feb 2017
Ham, 02 Feb 2017I've bought every Samsung flagship phone since the galaxy s... moreThe heart rate monitor always been on the side of camera. No one ever complain about its position. Samsung put the fingerprint sensor on the side of camera and all of a sudden everyone get a panic attack! Weird.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mNI
- 02 Feb 2017
The smaller S8 screen and body height is described as the same. LOL this is total bullshit.
- D
- AnonD-523334
- 7kh
- 02 Feb 2017
Anonymous, 02 Feb 2017another iPhone copy ! :xIt must be a sarcasm.
- c
- consumersmartphone
- K5u
- 02 Feb 2017
front is good and fit to many people but back ........ no comment. Sammy fanboy will defend this phone whatever it take or way. BTW where are they now? they should be here by now lol
- D
- Dakarr
- pDk
- 02 Feb 2017
131,58mm screen in 131,58mm body, isn't there an error ?...
- ?
- Anonymous
- tUc
- 02 Feb 2017
another iPhone copy ! :x
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8qA
- 02 Feb 2017
Lol look at its design !! just sony know what is good design ! just sony
- D
- AnonD-523334
- 7kh
- 02 Feb 2017
Anonymous, 01 Feb 2017Check your eyes and the check those corners. The SCREEN is ... moreIt seems possible when we remember rounded screen smart watches. It is not impossible. they may indeed be rounded.
- D
- AnonD-523334
- 7kh
- 02 Feb 2017
Anonymous, 01 Feb 2017Check your eyes and the check those corners. The SCREEN is ... moreLol but without checking your eyes u must know what a big difference was there between mi mix renders and Mi mix original.
- H
- Ham
- 9Ac
- 02 Feb 2017
I've bought every Samsung flagship phone since the galaxy s1 but if the finger print reader is stuck to the side of the camera lens then this is the first year I'll be sticking with the previous model. I really like the s7 edge anyway so Samsung's loss for a rediculous idea. Do these things not get tested on humans before final design.. i see this model failing on scales to match the last note.
- A
- Artist
- U@a
- 02 Feb 2017
Tom, 02 Feb 2017There are one or two brands that don't look bad in the fron... moreYou've to understand. Apple is Apple and Samsung is Samsung. I don't know what you think of that bitten apple logo on the back of iPhones, it's gorgeous in my opinion and instantly recognizable. Most of the Chinese phones come with no brand name on the front. Whatever Samsung phone I used, had a Samsung logo stamped on the front. Obviously Samsung has much more brand value compared to all the Chinese companies and I can't imagine a Samsung flagship without the front Samsung logo..
- ?
- Anonymous
- iLn
- 02 Feb 2017
Looks like LG G6
- b
- bwinzey
- b2X
- 02 Feb 2017
Precise, yet impossible. The screen size would be c^2 = a^2 + b^2, and performing those calculations with the dimensions given gives different diagonals than the ones given. So either Pythagoras is wrong or... you get the point.