samsung would have make a better design
- 2013-01-25 04:20
> In reply to A to Z @ 2013-01-25 03:17 from PS6Y - click to readdoes iOS 6 look any different on iphone 4, iphone 4s or on iphone 5????
- 2013-01-25 04:12
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-24 23:14 from v0Xt - click to readdvb-t is Digital Video Broadcasting - Terrestrial
used for broadcast Television
- 2013-01-25 03:46
well this is really not fair on samsung's part.. They have released a dual core processor galaxy grand phone in India & a quad core processor in korea. N now they call it as an affordable smart phone. Then what is micromax a116 doing here with such good specs & samsung calls galaxy grand an affordable one.. Ha ha.. Sic:-)
- 2013-01-25 03:22
- A to Z
so much of option of samsung but all same look .what designer sammy do? ha?
- 2013-01-25 03:17
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-24 23:14 from v0Xt - click to readDVB-T = online tv (it requires data connection).
the Dual-core Galaxy Grand is USD400,
this Quad-core must be more expensive than that.
might as well get the original Galaxy Note.
- 2013-01-25 02:54
- 2013-01-25 01:47
187 ppi WVGA Screen ? Zzzzzz......
- 2013-01-24 23:41
Wot is dvb-t?
- 2013-01-24 23:14
> In reply to Mik @ 2013-01-24 20:27 from RnDC - click to readdifferent because it's a grand.
- 2013-01-24 22:20
- Markus Leto
Another Samsung.. bleh..
- 2013-01-24 21:36
- - SiTdOwN -
what the he|| kind of ugly crap is this? Is this a joke? is that a phone or a cricket bat?
talk about completely sam-sucking the meaning out of the word "portability".....good job samsuck.....looks like you're out of ideas now.
- 2013-01-24 20:39
This is different from the other sea of galaxies how exactly?
- 2013-01-24 20:27
scamsung at it again, producing redundant phones.
- 2013-01-24 20:08
wanna know what's uglier? every nokias ever made!
- 2013-01-24 19:47
- 2013-01-24 18:55
The original Galaxy Grand has WVGA resolution, right? So, if you made this into quad-core, then this phone might become extremely fast because of the less power hungry screen. hmmm.... :\
- 2013-01-24 18:29
poor dpi. not worth the money. you better spend 3 bucks more and go for the sgs3.
- 2013-01-24 18:18
BORING! Same old stuff from Samsung!
Is it me or the quality of girls that Samsung are using for these product images, are dropping?
- 2013-01-24 18:01