samsung design always same and ugly
- 2013-04-30 18:41
> In reply to devilsdad @ 2013-04-18 12:10 from nx65 - click to readactually the iphone still sells pretty well due to the brand name. If this phone had proper flagship specs it would have eaten the iphone alive.
- 2013-04-20 22:09
> In reply to xIntenso @ 2013-04-18 12:35 from mSk9 - click to readyeah i agree samsung are going overboard with their one design fits-all strategy. The biggest loser will be the bragging factor of holding an S4, since it will look similar to all other samsung phones. The screen should also be HD at the very least.This, coupled with a quad core, would make a huge seller . It seems that samsung want to leave a sizeable gap once again between the S and the S mini.
- 2013-04-20 22:08
> In reply to Rodrigo Freijanes @ 2013-04-19 04:36 from LjYH - click to readHopefully you're wrong. Hopefully it's dual core A15.
- 2013-04-19 21:50
- Rodrigo Freijanes
Could be 1.2ghz quad core and 1.5gb ram.
- 2013-04-19 04:36
- Rodrigo Freijanes
- 2013-04-19 04:35
> In reply to Weapons Grade88 @ 2013-04-18 15:59 from 3GFs - click to readI did indeed realise, but that's why I don't like iPhones either :)
But then again, you do have a point. The only thing that you didn't account for, however, is that apple doesn't release about 10 phones with the same design in a single year.
- 2013-04-18 22:48
If this sell for $300-$350, it will be a hit. Galaxy S3 mini got very good review from actual users in Amazon market. You can get it now for $270.
- 2013-04-18 20:41
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-04-18 16:32 from v0qJ - click to readNo offence but iPhones are shit and there so expensive for a crappy phone
- 2013-04-18 18:56
the only way this phone will crush the market is by having killer specs. Samsung cannot make another mistake like the Galaxy3 mini. Its a great idea. Not everybody likes huge phones, but if you are going to give us a "Galaxy 4" in a smaller size, please make it as powerful as the regular Galaxy 4.
- 2013-04-18 18:01
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-04-18 13:30 from m77L - click to readThere are plenty of YouTube video that showed windows phone lag too.
- 2013-04-18 16:32
- samsung rules
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-04-18 13:45 from thHS - click to readWho cares? Millions of people from all over the world so be careful on your statement
- 2013-04-18 16:31
- who cares
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-04-18 13:58 from mSk9 - click to readProject butter,Project oil slick,Project KY jelly whatever you want to call it both my Galaxy Nexus and Nexus4 running 4.2.2 with over clocked kernels still have some lag issues..IT has been improved alot with 4.2.2 but you still see/feel lag between certain screen transitions..
- 2013-04-18 16:02
- Weapons Grade88
> In reply to xIntenso @ 2013-04-18 12:35 from mSk9 - click to readYou do realise, Apple have used the same design ethos with their iPhone's right? There was only one change and that was the design profile from the iPhone 3/3gs and the 4. The 4, 4s and the 5 all look very very similar, albeit the 5 is slightly longer. Compared with Samsung's design properties, I see very little difference. It's worked so far for both Apple and Samsung, hence very little change. Simple maths and logistics. Yes, it won't be everyone's cup of tea but that's the way it is. Also, to those harking on about Samsung's use of plastic, well again, not everyone's cup of tea, but Samsung has won phone of the year awards for some reason.
- 2013-04-18 15:59
m very upset form the Samsung due to his ugly designs......Sony and htc are better than Samsung in designs
- 2013-04-18 15:58
> In reply to SamBr @ 2013-04-18 13:24 from 8QFk - click to readThe profile confirms the qHD (540 x 960 pixels) resolution of the screen, which is 4.3" in diagonal ...did you get it?haha..
- 2013-04-18 14:01
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-04-18 13:30 from m77L - click to readThe redesign of Android's smoothness already exists and it's called Project Butter, which is included in every Anroid version since 4.1
So until you've tried Android 4.1, I suggest you stop making such stupid remarks,
- 2013-04-18 13:58
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-04-18 13:45 from thHS - click to readwho?you cares...coz u keep on talkin' non-sense :)
- 2013-04-18 13:57
> In reply to SamBr @ 2013-04-18 13:24 from 8QFk - click to read4.3" is the diagonal screen size, not the aspect ratio, which is 16:9 instead of 4:3.
- 2013-04-18 13:57
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-04-18 13:30 from m77L - click to readand ur iphone has an outdated os... :)
- 2013-04-18 13:55