16GB Motorola Moto X to cost $575 SIM-free

02 August, 2013
If you feel like getting the 32 GB version without a contract you will need $629.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • HK@
  • 02 Aug 2013

after so much hype such a disappointment moto.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • H5D
    • 02 Aug 2013

    AnonD-80553, 02 Aug 2013Why? They are quads, but have lower perfomance. Just che... moreGet a Nexus 4 instead then, same GPU performance with more CPU performance.

      • G
      • Gone addict
      • Bw1
      • 02 Aug 2013

      Motorola WTF!!!

        • &
        • ူliker
        • vL5
        • 02 Aug 2013

        16GB - $575 32GB or - $629 r u kidding me ? i will but HTC One or SONY xperia z in steal of this

          • p
          • panjgoori
          • KIw
          • 02 Aug 2013

          better buy a xperia sp. too high price for a dual core phone.

            • D
            • AnonD-80553
            • m}i
            • 02 Aug 2013

            AnonD-171691, 02 Aug 2013Too costly.I will go for a quad core phone like Galaxy S4 o... moreWhy? They are quads, but have lower perfomance.

            Just check the GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt and 2.7 T-rex. Same performance as the top ones at 1080p offscreen. ONly the competitors do run 1080p, this runs 720p so in real life performance this will run much better. And take better photos as well.

            Main problem with this phone is availability.

              • D
              • AnonD-171713
              • arb
              • 02 Aug 2013

              epic fail!

                • D
                • AnonD-68356
                • t}P
                • 02 Aug 2013

                AnonD-12453, 02 Aug 2013you were nitpicking. of course by made, they mean assembled... moreyes you are right but I don't think that the difference in cost of labour is about 300$ per single unit of a phone which has specifications of a high-mid range phone

                  • D
                  • AnonD-171694
                  • TS8
                  • 02 Aug 2013

                  Nowadays people are more patriotic towards their purses than their country. So if u think 'Made in USA' tag will make'em shell a couple of hundred bucks extra, u r kidding urself.

                    • D
                    • AnonD-12453
                    • 61P
                    • 02 Aug 2013

                    AnonD-68356, 02 Aug 2013pathetic pricing and now many peoples will say that its cos... moreyou were nitpicking. of course by made, they mean assembled. obviously motorola didn't made their own parts. still the same, labor in usa and in china have a different pay.

                      • D
                      • AnonD-171691
                      • vju
                      • 02 Aug 2013

                      Too costly.I will go for a quad core phone like Galaxy S4 or HTC one instead of Moto X.

                        • D
                        • AnonD-68356
                        • t}P
                        • 02 Aug 2013

                        AnonD-12453, 02 Aug 2013its made in usa. what a pity. but i wonder why no one has e... moreits just assembled in USA not made in USA -_-

                          • D
                          • AnonD-12453
                          • 61P
                          • 02 Aug 2013

                          Daniel, 02 Aug 2013Why so expensive? Before, new phones were cheaper. I rememb... moreits made in usa. what a pity. but i wonder why no one has ever spoken about its availability, is it mean that it will only available in us? does anyone know?

                            • D
                            • AnonD-68356
                            • t}P
                            • 02 Aug 2013

                            pathetic pricing and now many peoples will say that its costly coz its made in USA..
                            u r wrong guys.. this phone is just assembled in USA not made in USA...

                              • i
                              • indon
                              • tA$
                              • 02 Aug 2013

                              come to think of it, as price point perspective it is a little bit expensive for it, i'd say 400 to 450 should be reasonable for me (compared to iph*ne 5, it is as the same specs, dual core cpu and quad core gpu), but to see in other perspective, it is good news for android if Motorola as Google owned company can focus to make the user experience and maximize the software experience, so it's a good sign that Google might change their focus to maximizing the OS rather than just boost the hardware..

                                • P
                                • Paximos
                                • 0f9
                                • 02 Aug 2013

                                Way tooooooooooo expensive...

                                  • D
                                  • AnonD-160142
                                  • 3HU
                                  • 02 Aug 2013

                                  was gonna get this but no thanks not anymore

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • PTG
                                    • 02 Aug 2013

                                    Simply too expensive...

                                      • D
                                      • AnonD-53686
                                      • YW2
                                      • 02 Aug 2013

                                      Better get the Xperia SP.... was planning to get moto x....but why not get the Galaxy S4 or HTC One with that money. Feature n spec wise Moto X doesn't even come close to those. Motorola n Google just pulled off an Apple

                                        • D
                                        • AnonD-120979
                                        • vb8
                                        • 02 Aug 2013

                                        And we thought only HTC does that kind of shit