Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo new photos, benchmark score arrive

11 January, 2014
The Antutu score clearly proves the CPU can enable all 6 cores simultaneously.

Sort by:

  • x
  • xperiafan324
  • Kgf
  • 11 Jan 2014

Thabris, 11 Jan 2014Terrible resolution for a 5.5"...What are you talking about? This is a mid-tier device, great resolution for a mid-ranger. Not everyone is a pixel-peeper, 267 ppi is sharp enough for the target audience of this device.

    • D
    • AnonD-151727
    • pE4
    • 11 Jan 2014

    That's right!

      • L
      • Lolhaha
      • t7X
      • 11 Jan 2014

      This kinds of specs now a days are useless. My sgs3 is still fast enough, heck even my iphone 3gs still do the job without a hiccup. So yeah.

        Thabris, 11 Jan 2014Terrible resolution for a 5.5"...it's a lie, because a lot of phones uses that resolution (includes the note 2) and works and seems excellent... you overreacted! and... so what you need more resolution? if the human eye don´t regonize more than 300 dpi in a screen... #lol

          • H
          • Haplok
          • 3AZ
          • 11 Jan 2014

          Thabris, 11 Jan 2014Terrible resolution for a 5.5"...Actually 720p is fine for 5,5". The screen on Note 2 is beautiful and sufficiently sharp.

            • D
            • AnonD-44928
            • 4AN
            • 11 Jan 2014

            You guys don't seem to be realizing that this phone is not being aimed as a premium, high-end device. It's specs, resolution, size, etc. are all clearly not flagship-grade, so don't expect them to be.

            This is Samsung's attempt at bringing the power and pen of a Note phablet to the midrange market.

            If you want to see a new design and flagship specs, wait until the Galaxy S5's announcement in march.

              • D
              • AnonD-177454
              • rtM
              • 11 Jan 2014

              this company makes a new phone every 5 min. i bet their chef manager knows the phone names his company make !

                • J
                • Jon
                • py7
                • 11 Jan 2014

                Nice phone, it is only the successor of Note 2.

                Note 2 will be phased out when this one will come in march. It will probably be a litle less expensive than Note 2 so i guess about 450 $...

                But why no FM radio ???

                  • D
                  • AnonD-77892
                  • v0q
                  • 11 Jan 2014

                  Thabris, 11 Jan 2014Terrible resolution for a 5.5"...Samsung is trolling the world dude!

                    • P
                    • Protocol
                    • t1$
                    • 11 Jan 2014

                    Even with a Hexa Core, TouchWiz UI can't run smooth without lagging. It's a flaw in the UI. Design of this phone looks cheap as all the Galaxy phones out there. Nothing new.

                      • C
                      • CHIPSETRACE
                      • Bh}
                      • 11 Jan 2014

                      true hexacore? better compared to true octacore?

                        • T
                        • Thabris
                        • n04
                        • 11 Jan 2014

                        Terrible resolution for a 5.5"...

                          • S
                          • Sachin
                          • XNi
                          • 11 Jan 2014

                          The way the camera and flash is placed seems that it is a note 2 variant with name of Note 3,,, nothing new... If it continues this way.. Then Samsung will get doomed...

                            • D
                            • AnonD-134497
                            • sSP
                            • 11 Jan 2014

                            Anonymous, 11 Jan 2014Why was this article delted, then reposted loIt was bugged with another article.

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • mJr
                              • 11 Jan 2014

                              Why was this article delted, then reposted lo