Apple iPhone 3GS
- ?
- Anonymous
- q{S
- 09 Dec 2009
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2009Side by side the HD2 is blown away.
821 vs 406 fps
ht... morehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmrXrQUZgwE
HTC higher screen res and faster processor.Better camera on hd2.
- G
- Garfield
- uBS
- 09 Dec 2009
Coffo, 08 Dec 2009Just wanted to say Ive been using my new I phone 3gs for 1 ... moreGood to hear that! ^_^
- ?
- Anonymous
- P%n
- 09 Dec 2009
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2009Ha,well your sharp had only 120x160 pixels.No wonder 65k co... moreSpoken like a sore loser with a 65k screen.
65k does not allow range of contrast available with 16 million colours which is what produces it's vibrancy.
Side by side 65k looks washed out and dull compared to 16 million colours.
There's a reason computer screens go above 16bit in settings.
- ?
- Anonymous
- q{S
- 09 Dec 2009
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2009320 x 480 doesn't cut what?
Most phones are still under ... moreHa,well your sharp had only 120x160 pixels.No wonder 65k colours didnt look good cause your pixel count was to low there.
Not good for you to compare that phone saying 65k doesnt cut it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- P%n
- 08 Dec 2009
nick, 08 Dec 2009using the 65k argument is a weak one.
side by side, you'... moreSide by side the HD2 is blown away.
821 vs 406 fps
http://www.glbenchmark.com/result.jsp?orderby=dvsg_best&brand=all&submit=OK&benchmark=glpro11
It looks like HTC has done their usual woeful job with graphics drivers.
- ?
- Anonymous
- P%n
- 08 Dec 2009
nick, 08 Dec 2009using the 65k argument is a weak one.
side by side, you'... more320 x 480 doesn't cut what?
Most phones are still under this resolution.
It makes it easier to use with fingers as text and links are still large enough to see clearly.
My Sharp GX10 in 2002 had a 65k screen, 65k just hasn't cut it since 2004 and 264k screens came out or 2005 when 16 million colour screens were introduced.
65k colour is ok for people who buy their art at Walmart.
- n
- nick
- nxw
- 08 Dec 2009
Chris_Skylock, 08 Dec 2009ORLY? then explain the SUPER expensive iPhone in the curren... moreusing the 65k argument is a weak one.
side by side, you'd take HTC's 800x480 capacitive touch screens anyday
320x480 doesn't cut it anymore
- ?
- Anonymous
- P%n
- 08 Dec 2009
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2009A feature list that contains all the faults of the iPhone t... moreWell I was reading the latest issue of Business Smartphone Kickstand Review and there were quite a few comments on the N900 kickstand, that this essential piece of smartphone equipment seemed rather flimsy and poorly implemented.
It is believed that, due to this kickstand, the world is headed for another recession as business people will have to make do with an inferior kickstand.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pvZ
- 08 Dec 2009
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2009The iphone is still the phone to beat. Action speaks louder... moreA feature list that contains all the faults of the iPhone that's repeatedly posted with the same link, looks more like the work of a single individual that got fed up with you guys trolling on various forums.
Yeah, if you never had a smartphone, it may look hard to imagine... if you come from a smartphone TO iPhone you're more like "WTF? was I not supposed to get this for 1000$???"
So no, I post that list just for fun's sake and to see how a brighter one - barely met one here - tries to disprove something... anything.
So in the end seeing you soldier boys defending a dead phone and a dead brand - because only a dead brand advertises it's sales - gives me almost daly a good laugh.
So please, go on...
- ?
- Anonymous
- FJT
- 08 Dec 2009
The iphone is still the phone to beat. Action speaks louder than words. If the iphone is truly inferior as haters deem it to be, they wouldn't be wasting their time in here trying so hard to enumerate every single feature they can think of that the iphone does not have as if all the other phones out there have every single feature possible.
The iphone is still the king of touchscreen phones, and it will stay that way for many more years to come, considering how advanced the iphone is when it comes to touchscreen UI. It will take some time for others to catch up. The iphone's OS is already 3 yrs old and is keeps on improving. Others are just starting with their new touch OS platforms. The most aggressive rival that I see is Android. Their advantage is, they have multiple devices using their OS, which can also be their disadvantage when it comes to quality control and dissimination of services and products. Example would be their eclair version. Some would ask, "why only the droid?", "how come the SE x10 does not have it?". It might share the same fate as symbian. While with the iphone, all iphones get all the updates as soon as it's available. That's the iphone's main advantage, and of course, its App Store.
- C
- Chris_Skylock
- t7I
- 08 Dec 2009
Let's avoid the flames and have our own opinions about cellphones to ourselves.
I apologize if we fight but I was stating what I analyzed and IS STILL continue to research as we speak.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pvZ
- 08 Dec 2009
Chris_Skylock, 08 Dec 2009ORLY? then explain the SUPER expensive iPhone in the curren... moreORLY you should check the actual production costs.
Paying more just because it's "apple" has no value for most people... certainly does explain the recent loss in sales, I mean not even reaching 200K in ASIA? I mean under 200.000 in a continent that actually represents half of the world...
- C
- Chris_Skylock
- t7I
- 08 Dec 2009
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2009I thin you're a fanboy since you guys are the only ones to ... moreORLY? then explain the SUPER expensive iPhone in the current situation?
Apple's iPhone are expensive due to: A) capacitive B)Apple license.
All Apple products are expensive despite you can get cheaper product on other manufacturer.
Why Nokia took this far to release a 3.2 Capacitive touchscreen phone?
I said "As I analyzed" and im not siding with anyone. Learn to read and understand. All I said was analyzed and I didnt say it's confirmed.
I noticed that capacitive touchscreen phones are expensive. Look at HTC, they're capacitive but has 65k of screens.
Im still waiting for a better product to much with the iPhone but I already found a handful of them. Nokia is not yet ready to face the iPhone with its 3.5 screen. The Nokia X6 is just the beginning. Same goes to other phone manufacturers
- C
- Coffo
- PvW
- 08 Dec 2009
Just wanted to say Ive been using my new I phone 3gs for 1 month now and it is truly fantastic. Super fast, excellent connection via wifi or 3gs. Gaming is far superior than any phone out there. Great battery life and remote app to operate your lap top via i tunes. So quick and so easy even a 3 year old can use it with out problems. Bravo Apple for another job well done
- ?
- Anonymous
- pvZ
- 08 Dec 2009
Chris_Skylock, 08 Dec 2009The true iPhone Killers (as I analyze)
Samsung i8910 Omn... moreI thin you're a fanboy since you guys are the only ones to use the term "iphone killer".
The capacitative argument is irrelevant since capacitative is oversensitive, imprecise and can only be used with the finger but at least it's somewhat more resistant. It's also an industry standard as you can find info panels in every city, metro, mall out there, which makes it incredibly cheap.
Also the screen size be it 3.2 or 3.8 makes no sense either since a 320 x 480 resolution is a handicap for any touch screen phone.
And no, no real journalist uses the term of iPhone killer, in my opinion you should go analyze F.C.ies
- T
- Tansen
- xnY
- 08 Dec 2009
fan, 08 Dec 2009what do you all think? iphone 3gs ornokia 5800 navi or 580... more5800 is nice, but my personal preference is for the Iphone 3GS. It has a much faster, cleaner interface and at times seems more intuitive. You'd be better off trying them both for yourself though
- C
- Chris_Skylock
- t7I
- 08 Dec 2009
The true iPhone Killers (as I analyze)
Samsung i8910 Omnia HD
Motorola MILESTONE
LG BL40 New Chocolate
Samsung Vodafone 360 H1
Vodafone 360 H1
These are the only current iPhone Killers as their features are superior to the iPhone 3Gs and they are all Capacitive touchscreen and in 3.5" screen size
- C
- Chris_Skylock
- t7I
- 08 Dec 2009
AS a product analyst, I can say is that the iPhone is in the middle of the metagame. There are a few 3.5" capacitive touchscreen phones and Nokia has not made a 3.5" capacitive phone except for the Nokia X6. A lot of other phone manufactures made capacitive touchscreens but few of them have 16M display.
With the prices of the Capacitive phone in the iPhone's standard, I can say it's quite expensive to have a Capacitive touchscreen phone.
Looking at the HTC's and the Nokia X6 are sure not cheap so I can say that Apple has the right price for its iPhone.
I think that a few phone with capacitive touchscreen has more features than the iPhone and I'll look at theother phones with such feature.
Well done, Apple, well done
- ?
- Anonymous
- kx%
- 08 Dec 2009
subi subi, 08 Dec 2009come on, let's face it. i have been an ardent fan of nokia ... moreI must agree, it is fun to use, but really, when it misses so many features how in the world could it not be smooth?
Actually, forget what I said, for how feature-less it is, IT'S SLOW!
- ?
- Anonymous
- kx%
- 08 Dec 2009
Anonymous, 08 Dec 2009Nokia's marketshare...
... How many of those phones have... moreYeah many don't care about the camera or about the other 70 features it misses in comparison with any other phone: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85idbPSp14A
Thank god it moves smooth, that's the least it can do!