Asus Zenfone Selfie review: Vanity light
Vanity light
Synthetic benchmarks
Befitting its midrange aspirations, the Asus Zenfone Selfie comes with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 under the hood. In this particular case the clock speed caps are set at 1.5GHz for the pseudo-big quad-core cluster of Cortex-A53's, and 1.11GHz for the other four cores.
Our review unit has 3GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage. There is a lower-specced version with 2GB of RAM and half the storage. It's natural that the 2GB of RAM may adversely affect some (but not all) of the tests, so have that in mind when sifting through the numbers below.
Sticking to our usual drill, we kick off with the GeekBench 3.0 benchmark. The Zenfone Selfie scores a lot like you'd expect from a Snapdragon 615 device. It's on par with the similarly equipped Moto X Play and marginally ahead of the Zenfone 2 with the lesser of the Atoms, the Z3560. The Exynos 7580 in the Samsung Galaxy J7 is ahead in raw CPU power, as are the Xperias C4 and C5 Ultra.
GeekBench 3
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
4589 -
OnePlus 2
4429 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
4242 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
4226 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
3619 -
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
2922 -
HTC Desire Eye
2911 -
Meizu m2 note
2649 -
Motorola Moto X Play
2608 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
2582 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
2451 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
2423
In Antutu the Zenfone Selfie posts good numbers, among the top Snapdragon 615's we've seen. It more than likely thanks to the 3GB of RAM, which can show its benefits in this compound benchmark. The more powerful CPU helps the Galaxy J7 inch ahead, despite it only has half the Selfie's RAM. The Xperias are towards the top of the crop, where you can find the top-specced Zenfone 2 with the Aton Z3580 and 4GB of RAM.
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
48361 -
OnePlus 2
47207 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
46502 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
46307 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
46307 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
42301 -
HTC Desire Eye
40296 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
38263 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
37130 -
Motorola Moto X Play
37020 -
Meizu m2 note
32054 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
29907
The overall score in Basemark II 2.0 isn't impressive on its own, but it's still higher than the Moto X Play. The Zenfone Selfie is also comfortably ahead of the Galaxy J7, though it still can't match the Xperias. If you want to beat them with an Asus smartphone in this benchmark, you'd have to go with a Zenfone 2 ZE551ML, and even the Z3560/2GB model will suffice.
Single-core performance of the Selfie is quite good, almost matching the Xperia C4 and C5 Ultra and again beating the Galaxy J7. The powerful Mediatek's in Sony's models show their strength in the multi-core results easily beating the Zenfone Selfie. The Galaxy J7 is only slightly ahead of the Selfie, and the Intel-inside Zenfone 2 isn't quite up to the same standard in the CPU parts of the benchmark.
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
1622 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
1090 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
1063 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
939 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
931 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
883 -
Motorola Moto X Play
809 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
709 -
Meizu m2 note
673
Basemark OS 2.0 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
5301 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
3434 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
2900 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
2872 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
2777 -
Motorola Moto X Play
2687 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
2436 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
2203 -
Meizu m2 note
1709
Basemark OS 2.0 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
24035 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
21809 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
21516 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
19629 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
18615 -
Motorola Moto X Play
17226 -
OnePlus 2
16798 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
8565 -
Meizu m2 note
8105
Moving on to graphics performance, the Zenfone Selfie shows some weaknesses. Never doing too well with FullHD screens the Adreno 405 posts lower numbers in GFXBench, even for its standards. A couple of fps behind the Moto X Play in the lighter T-Rex test and a few tenths of a frame in the more demanding Manhattan test aren't deal-breakers, but ruin the overall impression of a well-optimized Snapdragon 615 device.
The charts clearly show that either of the Zenfone 2's with their PowerVR G6430 are a much better option for intense 3D rendering. The Galaxy J7 does beat the Selfie in onscreen tests, but it's the lower 720p resolution that helps its cause.
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
48 -
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
30 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
27 -
HTC Desire Eye
23.4 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
23 -
Huawei Honor 7
17 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
16 -
Motorola Moto X Play
15 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
15 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
14.2 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
13 -
Meizu m2 note
12 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
12
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
46.7 -
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
30 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
27 -
HTC Desire Eye
24.6 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
23 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
20 -
Huawei Honor 7
19 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
16 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
15.1 -
Motorola Moto X Play
15 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
15 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
13 -
Meizu m2 note
12
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
22 -
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
13 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
13 -
HTC Desire Eye
10.3 -
Huawei Honor 7
9.2 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
8.5 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
6 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
6 -
Motorola Moto X Play
5.8 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
5.7 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
5.3 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
4.1 -
Meizu m2 note
2.3
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
22 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
13 -
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
12 -
HTC Desire Eye
10.9 -
Huawei Honor 7
9.3 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
8.3 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
7.9 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
6.4 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
6.4 -
Motorola Moto X Play
6.1 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
6 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
5.3 -
Meizu m2 note
2.3
In Basemark X the Zenfone Selfie sticks closer to its S615 brethren, comfortably ahead of the Galaxy J7, but still no match for the assorted Zenfone 2's.
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
21937 -
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
13414 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
12565 -
HTC Desire Eye
10249 -
Huawei Honor 7
9377 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
8518 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
5695 -
Motorola Moto X Play
5032 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
4953 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
4915 -
Meizu m2 note
3946 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
3922
JavaScript isn't the Selfie's cup of tea, scoring rather poorly in Kraken 1.1. That said, the Xperia C5 Ultra is the same ballpark and the Idol 3 (5.5) is even less inspiring and the. The Moto X Play shows that the Snapdragon 615 can do better and is well ahead, tied with the Galaxy J7. Again, the Zenfone 2's lead the pack.
General web browsing performance, tested by BrowserMark 2.1, doesn't look too good either. Ahead of the Xperia C5 Ultra, the Selfie is nowhere near the Moto X Play, which is also beaten by the Galaxy J7.
Kraken 1.1
Lower is better
-
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
5057 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
6360 -
OnePlus 2
6808 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
9504 -
HTC Desire Eye
11093 -
Huawei Honor 7
11493 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
12038 -
Motorola Moto X Play
12236 -
Meizu m2 note
14462 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
15815 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
17075 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
17157 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
18124
BrowserMark 2.1
Higher is better
-
OnePlus 2
2055 -
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML (Z3580) retail
1853 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
1508 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
1505 -
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML review
1486 -
Motorola Moto X Play
1483 -
Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5)
1343 -
HTC Desire Eye
1009 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie ZD551KL
918 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
860 -
Huawei Honor 7
825 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
793 -
Meizu m2 note
656
To sum it all up, the Zenfone Selfie's benchmark run is a mixed bag. Starting well in the CPU tests and going strong in compound benchmarks, it's trailing in graphics performance and scores below average numbers in browser tests.
Reader comments
- Anonymous
- 01 Jun 2018
- 2SD
no infrared
- nithin
- 01 Jun 2018
- 2SD
Good phone with very bad battery life. 1 star rating is also too much for its battery. 99% Asus phones fails to make battery life atleast average. Gaming also too bad.
- Anonymous
- 18 May 2018
- Dkc
this is the worst phone i have ever seen with cost of 14000 Rs. (at launched time) except camera department all other is dump.....it does not mean that camera is very good at all, picture quality is fab..but processing time is very poor...and custome...