Cat S52
MORE PICTURES

Cat S52

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • H
  • Human
  • Ski
  • 30 Oct 2019

Nice design, but sadly not so rugged as S41/S61. Battery is also too weak.
Good: it has all GSM and 3G frequencies. Bad: it has small amount 4G frequencies.

    500 euros really? are they out of their mind?

      • R
      • Ron
      • pJw
      • 29 Oct 2019

      Looks great for a rugged device, love the sleek design

        • R
        • Ron
        • pJw
        • 29 Oct 2019

        Looks great for a rugged device, love the sleek design

          • A
          • Andrei
          • 3RS
          • 29 Oct 2019

          At 500 euro Cat should have put a full hd screen on this phone in 2019

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • 8x$
            • 29 Oct 2019

            if these specs are official, this phone does not look very resistant as previous Cat phones, if you are paying $600 for a phone with very low specs but it is water/dust/drop resistant, it should be very resistant.
            But ok, i know Cat phones are not intended for every user

              • D
              • AnonD-731363
              • SH3
              • 29 Oct 2019

              Well for 150 eur less the Doogee S90 or S95 which cost between 350 up to 399 euros have a lot better specs and are IP69k phones.
              Because its Cat cost 300 extra bucks from what this phone really should cost.
              Times when a brand name was like a status symbol are long time gone.
              Now to be honest i rather would stick with more specced and ruged phone for much less money.